Honda is?PlatinumZealot wrote:Mclaren are thinking of their long time identity. Mercedes just was not in line with Rod Dennis' vision for Mclaren.
Honda is?PlatinumZealot wrote:Mclaren are thinking of their long time identity. Mercedes just was not in line with Rod Dennis' vision for Mclaren.
If you look at the top insert, the wing paint is shiny on the entire wing. On the bottom one the edges is not painted.Thunders:They removed a Part of the Cascade Wing.
Purely just different lightingmclaren111 wrote:If you look at the top insert, the wing paint is shiny on the entire wing. On the bottom one the edges is not painted.Thunders:They removed a Part of the Cascade Wing.
Would this make a difference to the airflow ??
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wbV5MJbVH0s/V ... 26fe41.png
Maybe finally we will see some progress [-o<jericho wrote:According to AMUS, the MP4-30 Honda sounds a lot better then it dit before!
i guess they have brought the latest spec engine , engine they intend to race with some reliability patches applied , if they discover more issues in these three daysjericho wrote:According to AMUS, the MP4-30 Honda sounds a lot better then it dit before!
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
Anthony Rowlinson @Rowlinson_F1 10m10 minutes agojericho wrote:According to AMUS, the MP4-30 Honda sounds a lot better then it dit before!
According to AMuS JB did his 7 Lap stint on Mediums. But i think that is better discussed in the testing Thread.max_speed wrote:can anyone please confirm ? on which tyres mclaren is running today , autosport says medium while another site says Development. why will mclaren prefer to run development tyres , if they are already into final test , wouldn't it be useful to run actual race tyres to gather as much data in parallel to collecting data fr engine.
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!