Maybe. It would also be flat and feature lots of right angles...but what does Houston have to do with this?xpensive wrote:Street-circuits typically cost a fraction of what building a road course from scratch out on an open field.
A Houston street-circuit would perhaps economically feasible and logistically plausible?
In fact, a couple IndyCar races were held on Houston streets. Seemed to go quite well.xpensive wrote:Street-circuits typically cost a fraction of what building a road course from scratch out on an open field.
A Houston street-circuit would perhaps economically feasible and logistically plausible?
The original deal, as Hellmund constructed it, was economically feasible. Very. Is it feasible now? Not so sure. Running out of money wouldn't surprise me in the least. They've already done so before.xpensive wrote:Just that I believe that a Texas race would have been economically feasible, had they not gone the whole nine yards, completely overshoot and decided to build an entirely new track, my prediction is that they will run out of money before summer.
He could not put a pass destroying kink before the corner...or add elevation changes. That's part of what's exciting about Austin..seems to be the first track he has designed with any features or passing places,,,but there is still time for him to ruin it.few things that the designer can do to make a track more or less exciting,
Tilke didn't design the layout of COTA, and he wasn't given latitude to ruin it, not that I think he would necessarily have done so...and really, no, there isn't time.strad wrote:He could not put a pass destroying kink before the corner...or add elevation changes. That's part of what's exciting about Austin..seems to be the first track he has designed with any features or passing places,,,but there is still time for him to ruin it.few things that the designer can do to make a track more or less exciting,
Uhh, yes he did, he's been lead designer on it since day 1.Tilke didn't design the layout of COTA
...and he was hired by whom?beelsebob wrote:Uhh, yes he did, he's been lead designer on it since day 1.Tilke didn't design the layout of COTA
Put up or shut up, as they say. You'd be on long odds of course, given that the financing is already in place and Bernie already paid.xpensive wrote:my prediction is that they will run out of money before summer.
Well, that's admittedly less trölltastic - but as predictions go, it does have the distinct advantage of actual possibility. But I'm interfering with your fun.nxpensive wrote:With the amount of money they're putting into the project, I don't see how COTA will be able to service their debt, much less show a profit in the years to come. I fear that they're grossly overestimating the longer-term public interest in the sport and underestimating the impact that the Jersey Shore GP will have on ticket sales. The safer bet surely would have been to measure the potential for the event by running a street race for several years before investing so much in such a grand facility.
No offense, but I think all we really know for sure is that Bernie has been paid....for one year. COTA is the only one saying the financing is in place. I've heard differently, esp in regard to enough financing to finish the entire project.Pup wrote:Put up or shut up, as they say. You'd be on long odds of course, given that the financing is already in place and Bernie already paid.xpensive wrote:my prediction is that they will run out of money before summer.
Bernie, for one, and all he's said in that regard is that they don't have the money...but even disregarding that, you're ready to just take COTA at their word after all that's gone down?Pup wrote:Who, other than COTA, would say?