COTA Austin - construction and infrastructure

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.

What do you think of the prospect of a USGP 2012 at Austin Texas

Good thinking. Place has good infra structure and nice climate in winter.
126
47%
Not good as it has no motor sport tradition in the US.
23
9%
I will wait to see how it will shape up.
97
36%
I don't care.
23
9%
 
Total votes: 269

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: 2012 US GP to be held in Austin

Post

I never said anything negative of Tilke, it's just that the modern-day F1 tracks are xtremely costly, with wide run-off areas and state of the art facilities in each and every respect. I'm afraid the organisers thinks it's about an IRL or Nascar race.

I might be a rude awakening when the bills for this and that, on what is demanded of a modern F1 track start coming in.
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

User avatar
Jeffsvilleusa
0
Joined: 15 Apr 2011, 00:14
Location: San Francisco

Re: 2012 US GP to be held in Austin

Post

Singapore is the model for a successful purpose-built track, isn't it? Albeit it's a street circuit. According to wikipedia, the design was a combination of Tilke's design with KBR (houston-based construction outfit) who completed it. Another case of design by committee?

Anyway, any business man worth his salt would know xcactly ;) what they are getting into, wouldn't they?
Box! Box!

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: 2012 US GP to be held in Austin

Post

Street-circuits typically cost a fraction of what building a road course from scratch out on an open field.

A Houston street-circuit would perhaps economically feasible and logistically plausible?
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

hairy_scotsman
hairy_scotsman
15
Joined: 13 Nov 2010, 22:47

Re: 2012 US GP to be held in Austin

Post

xpensive wrote:Street-circuits typically cost a fraction of what building a road course from scratch out on an open field.

A Houston street-circuit would perhaps economically feasible and logistically plausible?
Maybe. It would also be flat and feature lots of right angles...but what does Houston have to do with this?
Follow me on twitter @Austin_F1 ...

donskar
donskar
2
Joined: 03 Feb 2007, 16:41
Location: Cardboard box, end of Boulevard of Broken Dreams

Re: 2012 US GP to be held in Austin

Post

xpensive wrote:Street-circuits typically cost a fraction of what building a road course from scratch out on an open field.

A Houston street-circuit would perhaps economically feasible and logistically plausible?
In fact, a couple IndyCar races were held on Houston streets. Seemed to go quite well.
Enzo Ferrari was a great man. But he was not a good man. -- Phil Hill

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: 2012 US GP to be held in Austin

Post

Just that I believe that a Texas race would have been economically feasible, had they not gone the whole nine yards, completely overshoot and decided to build an entirely new track, my prediction is that they will run out of money before summer.
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

hairy_scotsman
hairy_scotsman
15
Joined: 13 Nov 2010, 22:47

Re: 2012 US GP to be held in Austin

Post

xpensive wrote:Just that I believe that a Texas race would have been economically feasible, had they not gone the whole nine yards, completely overshoot and decided to build an entirely new track, my prediction is that they will run out of money before summer.
The original deal, as Hellmund constructed it, was economically feasible. Very. Is it feasible now? Not so sure. Running out of money wouldn't surprise me in the least. They've already done so before.

The investors who kicked Hellmund out of the deal inspire no confidence whatever, imho.
Follow me on twitter @Austin_F1 ...

User avatar
strad
117
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 01:57

Re: 2012 US GP to be held in Austin

Post

few things that the designer can do to make a track more or less exciting,
He could not put a pass destroying kink before the corner...or add elevation changes. That's part of what's exciting about Austin..seems to be the first track he has designed with any features or passing places,,,but there is still time for him to ruin it.
To achieve anything, you must be prepared to dabble on the boundary of disaster.”
Sir Stirling Moss

hairy_scotsman
hairy_scotsman
15
Joined: 13 Nov 2010, 22:47

Re: 2012 US GP to be held in Austin

Post

strad wrote:
few things that the designer can do to make a track more or less exciting,
He could not put a pass destroying kink before the corner...or add elevation changes. That's part of what's exciting about Austin..seems to be the first track he has designed with any features or passing places,,,but there is still time for him to ruin it.
Tilke didn't design the layout of COTA, and he wasn't given latitude to ruin it, not that I think he would necessarily have done so...and really, no, there isn't time.
Follow me on twitter @Austin_F1 ...

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: 2012 US GP to be held in Austin

Post

Tilke didn't design the layout of COTA
Uhh, yes he did, he's been lead designer on it since day 1.

hairy_scotsman
hairy_scotsman
15
Joined: 13 Nov 2010, 22:47

Re: 2012 US GP to be held in Austin

Post

beelsebob wrote:
Tilke didn't design the layout of COTA
Uhh, yes he did, he's been lead designer on it since day 1.
...and he was hired by whom?

Hellmund & Schwantz designed the layout. Tilke was retained to do the rest (and there's a lot of that).
Follow me on twitter @Austin_F1 ...

Pup
Pup
50
Joined: 08 May 2008, 17:45

Re: 2012 US GP to be held in Austin

Post

xpensive wrote:my prediction is that they will run out of money before summer.
Put up or shut up, as they say. You'd be on long odds of course, given that the financing is already in place and Bernie already paid.

So perhaps a better tack for you would be this:
nxpensive wrote:With the amount of money they're putting into the project, I don't see how COTA will be able to service their debt, much less show a profit in the years to come. I fear that they're grossly overestimating the longer-term public interest in the sport and underestimating the impact that the Jersey Shore GP will have on ticket sales. The safer bet surely would have been to measure the potential for the event by running a street race for several years before investing so much in such a grand facility.
Well, that's admittedly less trölltastic - but as predictions go, it does have the distinct advantage of actual possibility. But I'm interfering with your fun.

hairy_scotsman
hairy_scotsman
15
Joined: 13 Nov 2010, 22:47

Re: 2012 US GP to be held in Austin

Post

Pup wrote:
xpensive wrote:my prediction is that they will run out of money before summer.
Put up or shut up, as they say. You'd be on long odds of course, given that the financing is already in place and Bernie already paid.
No offense, but I think all we really know for sure is that Bernie has been paid....for one year. COTA is the only one saying the financing is in place. I've heard differently, esp in regard to enough financing to finish the entire project.
Follow me on twitter @Austin_F1 ...

Pup
Pup
50
Joined: 08 May 2008, 17:45

Re: 2012 US GP to be held in Austin

Post

Who, other than COTA, would say?

hairy_scotsman
hairy_scotsman
15
Joined: 13 Nov 2010, 22:47

Re: 2012 US GP to be held in Austin

Post

Pup wrote:Who, other than COTA, would say?
Bernie, for one, and all he's said in that regard is that they don't have the money...but even disregarding that, you're ready to just take COTA at their word after all that's gone down?
Follow me on twitter @Austin_F1 ...