basti313 wrote:
I still don't buy this. For Ferrari we can argue with the shape of the nose, ok...but for Merc there is no reasonable explanation for anything like guiding the air. And if the camera would be in an upgoing stream it would not be in a "streamline" shape and produce drag and lift.
Different aero philosophies from Mercedes, Ferrari and Red Bull makes it difficult to compare them at this stage. As far as Merc goes, the camera mounts must have an effect otherwise why bother ? Same for Red Bull placing the front camera into the nose section, rather than on the outside.
For me the air running through the suspension is more or less useless for "designing" downforce. It has an effect, but it is very hard to work with it. So Merc has put the camera as high a possible by the rules, right in front of the front suspension, in order not to produce even more "dirty" air and to keep it as far away as possible from the front wing upwash.
Well it's how it all works together as a package, you can't isolate one bit from another and call it useless. Unless you know what is going on precisely with the airflow over the car.
So for me the mandatory cameras are just a problem, not a help. RedBull has completely solved this problem with their solution.
That depends if they are deemed legal, as the other teams will likely protest it, while trying to copy it for later in the season just in case the FIA deem it legal. I think it's classic Newey, pushing the rules to breaking point. We shall just have to wait and see if the other teams protest after qualifying or the race.