Ferrari F14T

[Crabbia]

Nice new Front Wing.

Also, the new nose looks to have a concave shape (it sinks downwards) if you look at Kimi's 7.

Previously it seemed to be convex.

I Could be wrong: Maybe its just an angle we havent seen before, maybe its reflections. hard to tell.

[zonk]

[Avocado]

Nice new Front Wing.

Also, the new nose looks to have a concave shape (it sinks inwards) if you look at Kimi's 7.

Previously it seemed to be convex.

I Could be wrong: Maybe its just an angle we havent seen before, maybe its reflections. hard to tell.

No, it's the same nose.

Also, it still looks less advanced than front wings on other cars, especially Mercedes and McLaren. Nothing special.

[.poz]

No stay on the t-tray in the upper photo (new front wing)

[Blackout]

Looks familiar... Not completely new.

[miguelalvesreis]

Nice new Front Wing.

Also, the new nose looks to have a concave shape (it sinks downwards) if you look at Kimi's 7.

Previously it seemed to be convex.

I Could be wrong: Maybe its just an angle we havent seen before, maybe its reflections. hard to tell.

Seemed different to me as well. But need better photos. The black painting seems different

[Kiril Varbanov]

SkyF1 compares further:

[Thunder]

Nose looks the same.

[el-Magico]

Also, it still looks less advanced than front wings on other cars, especially Mercedes and McLaren. Nothing special.

Please explain what makes you think that this Mclaren wing is more advanced?
To me it looks the other way around.. Ferrari's wing looks way more advanced..

[zonk]

[Crabbia]

Nose looks the same.

http://img3.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Kim ... 758169.jpg

Yep you're right.

[Bomber_Pilot]

I like this car more and more. Looking at the pictures that thunders and zonk posted I think i preffer it to the 138.

[xDama]

Raikkonen is using a Bell helmet again? I remember somewhere last year that he said he wanted to keep using his Bell-helmet at Ferrari.

[turbof1]

Still not as advanced as the mercedes wing (which was right there from the beginning). Mercedes did more with the cascades and the turning vane/flap/wing angle adjuster on top of the wing.

That being said, it is a good upgrade.

[beelsebob]

Still not as advanced as the mercedes wing (which was right there from the beginning). Mercedes did more with the cascades and the turning vane/flap/wing angle adjuster on top of the wing.

That being said, it is a good upgrade.

What do you mean "not as advanced". Have you actually done CFD/wind tunnel testing on these and discovered which sends air to the necessary places better?

What you really mean is "visually, this has fewer twiddly bits", which is far from "advanced".