If this is an excuse, you have to think I write "in spanish". You wouldn't believe how hard I try NOT to use latin words nor spanish grammar ("preocupation" for "worry", "explained" for "told", "I have had" for "I had", not so many "that"s, etc.)
In spanish, most english sounds very simple. It sounds like "barking" or that's what Caesar said, long time ago. It forces you to miss the fine points. I'm sure latin speakers get what I try to say. How you tell the difference between "ser" and "estar"?
Sorry, anyway. Point taken. There is people here translating from English to their own languages. Many things must be lost during that.
English native speakers must think I do it on purpose. It's not what I intend. I use bold type to mark the phrases that sum up the post. Modbaraban has complained already. I think he has not used them to skip through the post.
I won't deprive myself of writing more stuff like this,
but I swear I will study rules for "Simple English Wikipedia". Next time I will erase everything except words in bold. No more thre sy-lla-bles words. No more phrases over six words. Thanks again, here you have a new version:
- Bernie pushed Max as president to get money. Lots of money.
- Max is penyless and depends on Ecclestone
- Max has some independence now
- Bernie must have another person as candidate
- Bernie has already be a traitor to other president
- Bernie must know Max little secrets
- Bernie is the one that can deal with others in case Max is fired
- A "short election" only benefits Bernie
The ACC does not need my input. They know what to do: they'll bend over, like I do sometimes. They don't cringe any more because there aren't thinner carpets (as we say in spanish). They'll play Bernie's game. I think we do the same in this very thread.
WhiteBlue can be right, anyway. Perhaps there is a "Third Man". It will dawn and we will see (another spanish phrase).
