Callum wrote:In Mark Hughes' autosport columb he says a rival engineer says this about the McLaren..
"There are a couple of cars, and mclaren is one of them, that in their treatment of one fundimental part if the airflow regime show that their aerodynamisits have come to the fore during the era thats just finished, where gains were made in incrimental changes. If they had experiance of the previous generation of cars they would have known immediately how to treat treat one particular area that is probably even more important than the diffuser under these regs"
What could this area be?? the first thing i thought of was nose/front wing...but Mclaren and Brawn have quite a sumilar nose design.
I would imagine its the front of the floor or front wing endplates - possibly also in sealing the floor along the two sides of the sidepods to improve efficiency.
IMO its all about the floor and how much you can get out of it. I think that is always the area that makes or breaks an F1 car. Its free downforce (by free I mean relatively drag free). So the front wing endplates, bargeboards, splitter... all that - crucial to using the floor right.
But then - its not as if I've worked on the previous generation so I really cannot say definitively whether that is the case or not.