I'm going with the engine manufacturers first:
1. Mercedes
2. Ferrari/Red Bull
4. Alpine
I think all 4 teams have the facility/staff advantage over the rest.
I wish to see a 6 way battle for WDC and a new champion! George or Leclerc or Lando or Ricciardo. We need more champions on the grid. If heavens have repeat plan, may that be Alonso.
I definitely agree maps should be frozen along with engines, otherwise it's not really a "freeze".Csmith1980 wrote: ↑26 Dec 2021, 18:38Perhaps you would prefer the term workaround?Ryar wrote: ↑26 Dec 2021, 18:25The definitions are quite messy here to call something as "trick". If a manufacturer is introducing a part, other than the original one, it's a performance update, if it is allowed. In a year where there was allowance of one upgrade of different parts, different manufacturers chose different intervals to do upgrades. If a "reliability" upgrade enables unlocking further aggressive engine modes, which they were unable to run, that's not "trick". Reliability upgrades goes through the process of scrutineering and if it is given a go ahead, it's really insane to call it, "trick", regardless if Mercedes does it or Red Bull. This is going to continue happening in 2022, where manufacturers would push certain fragile parts, if they are highly performant as they know, they can roll out reliability upgrades. Good luck calling it, "trick", because Mercedes made some noise mid season this year to rally their fans.Csmith1980 wrote: ↑26 Dec 2021, 15:09
Honda’s 2nd PU introduced at Paul Ricard was all of a sudden honda are class of the field. Honda somewhat denied any upgrade but the data didn’t lie.
Redbull fans defended that apparent performance increase by claiming it was there in the first race at Bahrain but reliability issues meant the PU couldn’t be run in that mode for a prolonged period.
That was Hondas “trick”
It would appear Mercedes had performance in reserve but couldn’t reliably run those modes until they themselves made a “reliability” upgrade around monza I believe. This updated PU was something like 600g heavier.
If you employ aggressive engine modes with the knowledge it is unsustainable without damaging your PU, then later deploy a reliability upgrade which fixes the reason why you couldn’t run that mode consistently, then I would call that a “workaround” and it would appear both Honda and Mercedes used it this season.
But I fear we are getting off topic and I can sense more downvotes coming my way.
I suspect it can be stopped by freezing engine maps. Manufacturers can still have one or more aggressive maps which are unreliable and push it as part of freeze, but use a different, less aggressive maps in races before reliability upgrades. Once the reliability upgrades are bolted, use the most aggressive one, whichever that can be run due to the upgrades. More upgrades, move up to more aggressive maps.
It would probably mean tanking 2022 if you got locked into a very aggressive map, by race 10 the team would probably be in the penalties at the rate Mercedes was going through engines in the home stretch of 21, might be worth it for future proofing.Ryar wrote: ↑29 Dec 2021, 03:45I suspect it can be stopped by freezing engine maps. Manufacturers can still have one or more aggressive maps which are unreliable and push it as part of freeze, but use a different, less aggressive maps in races before reliability upgrades. Once the reliability upgrades are bolted, use the most aggressive one, whichever that can be run due to the upgrades. More upgrades, move up to more aggressive maps.