Brilliant find...if only i could read spanishbar555 wrote:Here is a very good link explaining in graphics how Brawn's diffuser works
http://www.marca.com/2009/04/15/motor/f ... 25973.html
here are some images taken
Brilliant find...if only i could read spanishbar555 wrote:Here is a very good link explaining in graphics how Brawn's diffuser works
http://www.marca.com/2009/04/15/motor/f ... 25973.html
here are some images taken
hopefully we get to see the update on this matter. i'm very interested how they will resolve the issue.Ross Brawn interview on www.jamesallonf1.com wrote:What happened to your pace in the second part of qualifying?
“We had a bit of a problem with some settings on the car, it’s not quite right in some parts of the track. We have a problem with the suspension topping out and as the grip has improved it’s been getting worse because we haven’t got enough rear suspension travel. It’s a legacy of fitting the Mercedes Benz engine because we had to lift the gearbox up to fit the engine and it’s causing a few problems.
Ross Brawn did a tremendous job with the car, but all other cars looking like "toy" cars ... not exactly. Toyota's TF109 also has vertically stacked winglets between the rear wing and rear wheels to generate additional downforce. Toyota's diffuser is arguably more complex than the Brawn. Red Bull's RB5 has a quite complex front wing as well as front nose. The RB5 rear packaging is also quite complex.wesley123 wrote:The brawn cars have a genial view on teh rules, those flaps on the wheel and diffuser are a small part of it, i am getting more and more the felling that they far from showed all the potential in the car. Every car looks like a toy car when you compare it to this car.
Well the pics are wrong and show that the drawer has no idea of how the diffuser works. the holes should draw air from below the car not allow outside air into the diffuser.xpensive wrote:Great images Callum, to the best of my understanding, I think they give a reaonable explanation of what the argument is all about. Although it is dificult to know precisely how those openings to the secondary central-diffuser are arranged.
And hey, about those masters just shooting your pics down without having a shred of their own to contribute, think nothing of it, this forum is rather densly populated by engineering-wannabees.
Cosidering diffuser is a secondary device in ground effect aero to enhance the function of the floor's interaction with the groundplane, without making use of the airflow through the underside the diffuser does nothing. I'd think introducing "top side" flow into the diffuser would actually hurt the function of the diffuser...xpensive wrote:Great images Callum, to the best of my understanding, I think they give a reaonable explanation of what the argument is all about. Although it is dificult to know precisely how those openings to the secondary central-diffuser are arranged.
And hey, about those masters just shooting your pics down without having a shred of their own to contribute, think nothing of it, this forum is rather densly populated by engineering-wannabees.
It's how you define them...it's all semantics!jason.parker.86 wrote:OK. So I am even more confused now after seeing above. On the Macca illustration their are holes in that diffuser which I thought wasnt allowed under the rules / regs?