No, manifolds themselves would be heavier, turbine housing would also be heavier*
*engineering get-out clause… utilising basic hand-calcs!
No, manifolds themselves would be heavier, turbine housing would also be heavier*
Not much heavier?
Replacing two big couplings with six small ones. Yeah a bit more weight.
More places to leak.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑25 Mar 2022, 16:06Replacing two big couplings with six small ones. Yeah a bit more weight.
But remember the power units have a minimum weight. If what we hear is true most teams already add ballast. So a couple hundred grams might not even register.
Is it about creating an aero benefit, though? Apparently, FX Demaison suggested to F1's Sam Collins it was more about cooling, which sounds believable.
Looking at pictures of before and after the "upgrade" I couldn't tell a difference.(via motorsport-total.com)
- Front wing: Modified, enlarged Gurney flap for better balance (use optional, in response to the also modified beam wing).
- Front axle: Modified air deflectors on the brake ducts for better airflow to the entire car behind them.
- Underbody: Modified support strut between gearbox and underbody, now made of different material, as a direct result of damage to both cars at the race in Saudi Arabia
- Beam wing: Slightly enlarged elements with realigned angles of attack for more downforce, also in combination with the rear wing.