McLaren MCL36

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Emag
Emag
84
Joined: 11 Feb 2019, 14:56

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

CjC wrote:
25 Mar 2022, 23:12
SmallSoldier wrote:
24 Mar 2022, 23:40
CjC wrote:
24 Mar 2022, 23:17


Yea I can see that. I just feel they are asking too much of the air to be effective with this solution. Maybe the other teams think the same as well considering they are using that area for the throat
Well, other teams are using that area for other purposes, for example Red Bull / Ferrari have a wider T-Tray area to house electronics and t-tray dampener in there… the effective area of the Tunnel entrance should be the same or fairly similar.
I see. So is the there a maximum size for the throat of the the floor?
Yes, I think it's limited. I suspect the reason why the openings and the "bargeboards" look bigger at the likes of RedBull is because they might have pushed the entrance backwards a bit, sacrificing some tunnel length to give them more real estate with the bodywork near the entrance to the tunnels.

Whereas teams like McLaren and Ferrari have gone for maximum tunnel length with much less to play with in terms of bodywork at that area.

Motörhead
Motörhead
3
Joined: 24 Feb 2017, 20:15

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
24 Mar 2022, 11:57
If Norris comments about 100 pts of downforce are correct, that's a lot. And surely comes mostly from the floor, since wings can only do so much on their own. Their floor sealing looked to be decent, but that doesn't tell us anything about the actual geometry underneath...

Sidepods can only do so much, once everything else is as it should be, so they can't be the reason, not even close. Also, having that big of a deficit is surely related to actual downforce requirements set for the launch spec. You can't go high enough if you don't aim high enough...
Roughly speaking, 100pts equate to over three seconds, so one has to assume that Lando is being slightly sarcastic. Can’t blame him to be honest. But it’s a slight over reaction

Motörhead
Motörhead
3
Joined: 24 Feb 2017, 20:15

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

PhillipM wrote:
25 Mar 2022, 13:49
vorticism wrote:
25 Mar 2022, 03:52
That pushrod is interdimensional.
Mclaren got their time-space suspension theory wrong and their pushrods don't connect in the middle. That's why they're so slow. You heard it here first.
Yes, PhillipM is completely having a laugh.
There’s nothing wrong with the suspension. It’s lack of CLT. Simple as that.

User avatar
Vanja #66
1572
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Motörhead wrote:
25 Mar 2022, 23:29
Roughly speaking, 100pts equate to over three seconds, so one has to assume that Lando is being slightly sarcastic. Can’t blame him to be honest. But it’s a slight over reaction
3s is a bit too much, its closer to 1-1.5s as far as I know.
AeroGimli.x

And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

User avatar
Stu
Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2019, 10:05
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Big Tea wrote:
25 Mar 2022, 14:48
PhillipM wrote:
25 Mar 2022, 14:36
DiogoBrand wrote:
25 Mar 2022, 14:21
At least this probably means soon enough they'll be able to go back in time and fix it.
(Bet you didn't think people would take your comment seriously :lol: )
They're gonna call a Doctor.
No, no, I did not...

Look at the picture, people, look at the picture :lol:
No excuse for tardisness
👏👏👏👏👏 bravo!!!
Perspective - Understanding that sometimes the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.

User avatar
Stu
Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2019, 10:05
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

CjC wrote:
25 Mar 2022, 23:12
SmallSoldier wrote:
24 Mar 2022, 23:40
CjC wrote:
24 Mar 2022, 23:17


Yea I can see that. I just feel they are asking too much of the air to be effective with this solution. Maybe the other teams think the same as well considering they are using that area for the throat
Well, other teams are using that area for other purposes, for example Red Bull / Ferrari have a wider T-Tray area to house electronics and t-tray dampener in there… the effective area of the Tunnel entrance should be the same or fairly similar.
I see. So is the there a maximum size for the throat of the the floor?
Yes, but what McLaren seem to be doing is taking the keel to a minimum (physically) but using the legality box for the keel to create a channel/duct to move air from the tea tray to the top surface of the floor. This also gives them, in effect, another underfloor strake for free!!
Perspective - Understanding that sometimes the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.

Motörhead
Motörhead
3
Joined: 24 Feb 2017, 20:15

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
26 Mar 2022, 07:12
Motörhead wrote:
25 Mar 2022, 23:29
Roughly speaking, 100pts equate to over three seconds, so one has to assume that Lando is being slightly sarcastic. Can’t blame him to be honest. But it’s a slight over reaction
3s is a bit too much, its closer to 1-1.5s as far as I know.
Take it from me, it’s roughly 30 pts CLT per second.

CIZUK
CIZUK
0
Joined: 12 Jan 2022, 12:55

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Motörhead wrote:
26 Mar 2022, 12:21
Vanja #66 wrote:
26 Mar 2022, 07:12
Motörhead wrote:
25 Mar 2022, 23:29
Roughly speaking, 100pts equate to over three seconds, so one has to assume that Lando is being slightly sarcastic. Can’t blame him to be honest. But it’s a slight over reaction
3s is a bit too much, its closer to 1-1.5s as far as I know.
Take it from me, it’s roughly 30 pts CLT per second.
What is a 'point'? Percent?

Ground Effect
Ground Effect
14
Joined: 02 Mar 2018, 12:39

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Brake duct fixes have slowed down development of the MCL36

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/mcla ... r/9336137/
Q: (Stefano Mancini – La Stampa) Kimi, will you help Vettel to win his championship this year?
Kimi Raikkonen: I can only drive one car, obviously. 
@2018 Singapore Grand Prix drivers press conference.

kfrantzios
kfrantzios
46
Joined: 11 Mar 2017, 15:19
Location: Greece

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

CIZUK wrote:
26 Mar 2022, 12:38
Motörhead wrote:
26 Mar 2022, 12:21
Vanja #66 wrote:
26 Mar 2022, 07:12


3s is a bit too much, its closer to 1-1.5s as far as I know.
Take it from me, it’s roughly 30 pts CLT per second.
What is a 'point'? Percent?
regarding "what is a point
viewtopic.php?t=8250&start=30

User avatar
charliesmithhd
67
Joined: 10 Jul 2018, 17:53

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Just seen the mechanics taping up cracks on the upper venturi inlet on daniels car. possibly caused by curb

SmallSoldier
SmallSoldier
479
Joined: 10 Mar 2019, 03:54

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

First Front Wing (used in Bahrain and FP1 in Jeddah) vs Higher Downforce front wing:

Image

SmallSoldier
SmallSoldier
479
Joined: 10 Mar 2019, 03:54

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

I know there is a lot of questions in regards to the choice of sidepod concept from McLaren, but from this view I really like how it looks… Hope they get the concept to work

Image

Vía XPB NextGen-Auto

User avatar
diffuser
236
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

SmallSoldier wrote:
28 Mar 2022, 07:30
I know there is a lot of questions in regards to the choice of sidepod concept from McLaren, but from this view I really like how it looks… Hope they get the concept to work

https://i.imgur.com/61U5Ybd.jpg

Vía XPB NextGen-Auto

You mean like from a fashion point of view?

SmallSoldier
SmallSoldier
479
Joined: 10 Mar 2019, 03:54

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

diffuser wrote:
29 Mar 2022, 00:58
SmallSoldier wrote:
28 Mar 2022, 07:30
I know there is a lot of questions in regards to the choice of sidepod concept from McLaren, but from this view I really like how it looks… Hope they get the concept to work

https://i.imgur.com/61U5Ybd.jpg

Vía XPB NextGen-Auto

You mean like from a fashion point of view?
From a completely aesthetic stand point (not talking about the livery)… If only looks would win races!

Just an opinion though.