As I remember, Haas was one of the earliest, if not the earliest to fully focus on the 2022 car.
And you know that how? Do you have the engineering degree focused on aerospace technology or you are just blowing empty air?1m0bius1 wrote: ↑04 Apr 2022, 08:55Except its downright embarrassing that a team with the budget, team and facilities of mclaren couldn't manage to conjure up something decent. Merc rbr and ferrari all have something decent. Merc less so but that they have alot of performance to unlock. Whereas we just made a --- car with zero potential outside standard upgrades.Ground Effect wrote: ↑04 Apr 2022, 08:37As I remember, Haas was one of the earliest, if not the earliest to fully focus on the 2022 car.
A freak result here and there will be the best it could happen. Something like AM last year minus the podium.mclaren111 wrote: ↑04 Apr 2022, 09:48
Don't think that's gonna happen... Too little too late...
Sadly, Front of Midfield will be a challenge...
I don't think people are angry Haas is doing well. People are angry that McLaren didn't do better with more resources available.CjC wrote: ↑04 Apr 2022, 11:13What I’m struggling to get my head round is why don’t fans/ members of this forum/ team personnel show the competition some respect. It’s like Haas aren’t allowed to be successful??
Yes Mclaren producing a slowish car realitive to the competition because they didn’t set themselves a high enough target is frustrating but to slag off Haas because their intelligent employees have formed their own sound solution of their own without copying anyone is ludicrous.
If they need to find a couple seconds, 6 months doesn’t sound like enough timemclaren111 wrote: ↑03 Apr 2022, 13:26https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/ricc ... m/9537420/
Ricciardo:
“Obviously a week ago, it was a bit of a, let’s call it, crisis mode. I think we've quickly got ourselves out of that.
“But it's true we've got to turn the ship around and I think he's at least one of the best guys to do it (Seidl).
So ask me in six months' time and maybe I won't be surprised with where we are.”
Six months is a long time...
Very sensible comment.CjC wrote: ↑04 Apr 2022, 11:13What I’m struggling to get my head round is why don’t fans/ members of this forum/ team personnel show the competition some respect. It’s like Haas aren’t allowed to be successful??
Yes Mclaren producing a slowish car realitive to the competition because they didn’t set themselves a high enough target is frustrating but to slag off Haas because their intelligent employees have formed their own sound solution of their own without copying anyone is ludicrous.
Does McLaren really have more resources available? According to Steiner himself, the difference in budgets between team is around 10-20 million, which isn’t the deficit that we have been used to in F1… Not only that, Haas has benefit from a 100% focus on the 2022 car, practically bolting a cut floor in the 2021 car and hoping for the best situation last season… While at the same time have had the second highest Wind Tunnel and CFD allocation of any team, which arguably has a larger impact on the car’s performance than the 10-20 million budget difference.Emag wrote: ↑04 Apr 2022, 13:09I don't think people are angry Haas is doing well. People are angry that McLaren didn't do better with more resources available.CjC wrote: ↑04 Apr 2022, 11:13What I’m struggling to get my head round is why don’t fans/ members of this forum/ team personnel show the competition some respect. It’s like Haas aren’t allowed to be successful??
Yes Mclaren producing a slowish car realitive to the competition because they didn’t set themselves a high enough target is frustrating but to slag off Haas because their intelligent employees have formed their own sound solution of their own without copying anyone is ludicrous.
It's also chasing a moving target. Say RB/Ferrari gain 0.5 sec and Merc/Renault 0.7 - they're still good part of a second behind depending on the track layout.mclaren111 wrote: ↑04 Apr 2022, 09:48
Don't think that's gonna happen... Too little too late...
Sadly, Front of Midfield will be a challenge...
If you invest on a very expensive team principal and technical director, translated into resources, that means McLaren had more available than Haas.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑04 Apr 2022, 15:02Does McLaren really have more resources available? According to Steiner himself, the difference in budgets between team is around 10-20 million, which isn’t the deficit that we have been used to in F1… Not only that, Haas has benefit from a 100% focus on the 2022 car, practically bolting a cut floor in the 2021 car and hoping for the best situation last season… While at the same time have had the second highest Wind Tunnel and CFD allocation of any team, which arguably has a larger impact on the car’s performance than the 10-20 million budget difference.Emag wrote: ↑04 Apr 2022, 13:09I don't think people are angry Haas is doing well. People are angry that McLaren didn't do better with more resources available.CjC wrote: ↑04 Apr 2022, 11:13What I’m struggling to get my head round is why don’t fans/ members of this forum/ team personnel show the competition some respect. It’s like Haas aren’t allowed to be successful??
Yes Mclaren producing a slowish car realitive to the competition because they didn’t set themselves a high enough target is frustrating but to slag off Haas because their intelligent employees have formed their own sound solution of their own without copying anyone is ludicrous.
Dallara (who builds the chassis for Haas) isn’t a backyard garage outfit, they have been manufacturing Indycar chasis since 1997 and are the sole manufacturer of the current series, they’ve designed and build the current spec WEC cars… They have a bit of experience… If you add the fact that Haas buys some parts from Ferrari and therefore doesn’t have the cost of development and resources necessary for those parts, it is not entirely surprising to see them doing well.