genarro wrote: ↑11 Apr 2022, 12:49
Ground Effect wrote: ↑11 Apr 2022, 11:59
bauc wrote: ↑11 Apr 2022, 10:44
This is very reasonable and expected.
If the updates do not give the required effect team will switch its focus on next year's car (meaning they have learned were they made a mistake or simply missed the DF targets)
Agreed, I just hope they'll be able to gauge end of 2022 downforce levels and set an adequate 2023 target.
The article states that Seidl said that the concept of the car isnt flawed, so updates are probably in the pipeline. We just have to be patient because R&D takes time.
That's good to hear, but I do recall at least one article where Andreas used the term fundamental problem. He was asked about the seemingly lower performance level of the Mercedes engine compared to the likes of Ferrari and RBPT. He said something along the lines that the fundamental problems of the car doesn't include the engine. Entirely possible it's misrepresentation or even a wrong choice of word by him, or simply a statement lost in translation.
But it's clear there's a much better understanding of the car, as they came out of the blocks quickly on Friday.
Q: (Stefano Mancini – La Stampa) Kimi, will you help Vettel to win his championship this year?
Kimi Raikkonen: I can only drive one car, obviously.
@2018 Singapore Grand Prix drivers press conference.