You really need to temper your expectations, what are you expecting? Being top 3?, that’s a bit of a Stretch,Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑21 May 2022, 14:03Ok that is a little more interesting. The Bone I was saying. Let's hope for the whole Steak in Qualifying.
If FP3 order is representative (and it probably isn't), then it's actually closer than 6 tenths off P1 on a cleaner lap. At least for Lando.Swed3120 wrote: ↑21 May 2022, 14:05You really need to temper your expectations, what are you expecting? Being top 3?, that’s a bit of a Stretch,Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑21 May 2022, 14:03Ok that is a little more interesting. The Bone I was saying. Let's hope for the whole Steak in Qualifying.
We’ve gone from being close to a second of P1 to being 6 tenths of P1, 0.4sec improvement is nothing to scof at
Can’t see anything from the FIA about it. And hasn’t been mentioned on teamstream so presumably they haven’t.
Shame to see us remaining slow in sector 3_cerber1 wrote: ↑21 May 2022, 14:183 sector down
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FTR-9SDXEAA ... =4096x4096
Need to get this sorted._cerber1 wrote: ↑21 May 2022, 14:183 sector down
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FTR-9SDXEAA ... =4096x4096
On a somewhat unrelated note, with Copy Point (Aston) running with a replica of RedBull's sidepods here sort of proves how little the sidepod shape has to do with the ultimate pace of the car if the base platform is weak mechanically._cerber1 wrote: ↑21 May 2022, 14:183 sector down
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FTR-9SDXEAA ... =4096x4096
Oh absolutely. The DF contribution dominantly is by the underbody of the car. If anything the front wing is to balance that CofP + the aero flow further down wing is to condition and reduce wake messing with the clean flow. If the underbody suffers from stagnation/choke/turbulent flow, you lose far more time then you do by tinkering with side pods.Emag wrote: ↑21 May 2022, 14:52On a somewhat unrelated note, with Copy Point (Aston) running with a replica of RedBull's sidepods here sort of proves how little the sidepod shape has to do with the ultimate pace of the car if the base platform is weak mechanically._cerber1 wrote: ↑21 May 2022, 14:183 sector down
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FTR-9SDXEAA ... =4096x4096
Of course, the little details is what gets you the last half a second or so you need to challenge for the title. But when your car is super slow, a better sidepod configuration isn't going to magically pull you to the front. I say this because a lot of people here on the forums were heavily blaming McLaren's sidepod design after Bahrain thinking (wrongly) that their lack of pace was hugely caused because they hadn't gone for a wide sidepod configuration like RedBull and Ferrari.
Aston is living proof that unless your car has a strong foundation, no matter how good the bodywork aero is, it will not make you a front-runner.
Emag wrote: ↑21 May 2022, 14:52On a somewhat unrelated note, with Copy Point (Aston) running with a replica of RedBull's sidepods here sort of proves how little the sidepod shape has to do with the ultimate pace of the car if the base platform is weak mechanically._cerber1 wrote: ↑21 May 2022, 14:183 sector down
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FTR-9SDXEAA ... =4096x4096
Of course, the little details is what gets you the last half a second or so you need to challenge for the title. But when your car is super slow, a better sidepod configuration isn't going to magically pull you to the front. I say this because a lot of people here on the forums were heavily blaming McLaren's sidepod design after Bahrain thinking (wrongly) that their lack of pace was hugely caused because they hadn't gone for a wide sidepod configuration like RedBull and Ferrari.
Aston is living proof that unless your car has a strong foundation, no matter how good the bodywork aero is, it will not make you a front-runner.
exactly what I was thinking, three practice sessions (Lando lost time yesterday as well) isn't enough to optimize a car with major fundamental changes