Wonder if the nose stud of Hamilton has been surgically removed before the start of this weekend.
Or whether FIA going to give another grace
Were the cars running a legal temperature when they left the pitlane?Just_a_fan wrote: ↑30 Jun 2022, 11:17So the Red Bull / Max Mates have all forgotten Barcelona and the fact the Red Bull and AT almost failed to get out of the garages in time because their fuel was illegally cold.
Yeah, thought so.
I think what others have an issue with is that from this rule change you have zeroed in on Red Bull gaining an advantage. I will explain:Just_a_fan wrote: ↑30 Jun 2022, 11:17So the Red Bull / Max Mates have all forgotten Barcelona and the fact the Red Bull and AT almost failed to get out of the garages in time because their fuel was illegally cold.
Yeah, thought so.
Clutching on to straws.chrisc90 wrote: ↑30 Jun 2022, 11:34Were the cars running a legal temperature when they left the pitlane?Just_a_fan wrote: ↑30 Jun 2022, 11:17So the Red Bull / Max Mates have all forgotten Barcelona and the fact the Red Bull and AT almost failed to get out of the garages in time because their fuel was illegally cold.
Yeah, thought so.
If they were, you can’t complain can you.
You don’t realise how stupid it sounds when you mention it’s only benefitting one team, look how many people have called you out on it.
Bahrain of corse. Merc and RBR both had to do stuff around radiators thermal isolation, or fuel cooling, to make sure that fuel wouldn’t get too hot and cause issues in the fuel lines. Ferrari knew that was a challenge for them and rejected the change.
Let's assume for a second that, it was a reason for engine failures, how many failures did Redbull suffer since then due to fuel pump issue? None. So how is this new regulatory change going to help RBR when they didn't have that problem for 8 races?dialtone wrote: ↑30 Jun 2022, 16:10Bahrain of corse. Merc and RBR both had to do stuff around radiators thermal isolation, or fuel cooling, to make sure that fuel wouldn’t get too hot and cause issues in the fuel lines. Ferrari knew that was a challenge for them and rejected the change.
Now Ferrari probably liked to work on reliability and everyone got what they wanted.
JordanMugen wrote: ↑30 Jun 2022, 14:28All very nice, but I'm anxious to see this new Williams package!
No photos of the upgraded FW44 yet?
You should ask them, they were the ones asking for that rule change after Barcelona.Ryar wrote:Let's assume for a second that, it was a reason for engine failures, how many failures did Redbull suffer since then due to fuel pump issue? None. So how is this new regulatory change going to help RBR when they didn't have that problem for 8 races?dialtone wrote: ↑30 Jun 2022, 16:10Bahrain of corse. Merc and RBR both had to do stuff around radiators thermal isolation, or fuel cooling, to make sure that fuel wouldn’t get too hot and cause issues in the fuel lines. Ferrari knew that was a challenge for them and rejected the change.Juzh wrote: which one was that?
Now Ferrari probably liked to work on reliability and everyone got what they wanted.