read somewhere
John Elkan looking for someone to replace Binotto, because a lot of LEC's fans don't agree that Ferrari's interest should go before driver's
They made sure to give SAI an identical strategy to LEC this time though. Dutifully pitted SAI a lap later each time, with no counter strategy such as SAI not making a second stop and trying to hold on (I'm surprised SAI didn't ask to try go the end on the radio TBH).
Why wouldn’t they?JordanMugen wrote: ↑10 Jul 2022, 16:54They made sure to give SAI an identical to LEC this time though. Dutifully pitted SAI a lap later each time, with no counter strategy such as SAI not making a second stop and trying to hold on (I'm surprised SAI didn't ask to try go the end on the radio TBH).
Great drive from LEC! The reliability has started to even out SAI having the troubles this time.
Because of Sainz playing games, calling to gamble on a contrary strategy on the radio etc? But great to see Ferrari with simple and well executed strategy this time.JPower wrote: ↑10 Jul 2022, 16:55Why wouldn’t they?JordanMugen wrote: ↑10 Jul 2022, 16:54They made sure to give SAI an identical to LEC this time though.
Sainz playing games? What are you talking about?JordanMugen wrote: ↑10 Jul 2022, 16:57Because of Sainz playing games? But great to see Ferrari with simple and well executed strategy this time.JPower wrote: ↑10 Jul 2022, 16:55Why wouldn’t they?JordanMugen wrote: ↑10 Jul 2022, 16:54They made sure to give SAI an identical to LEC this time though.
This isn't really an engine power track, barely make 300kph in the straights. Ferrari was ahead because of better balance and better front tire wear. The engine blow up is likely the same thing that blew up in Spain for Charles.