Don't forget an advantage is relative to the other PU. The Ferrari and Renault are completely different from say the 2018/2019 PU. So maybe the Honda is still just as good as it was as high altitude, but it could be no longer an advantage due to the other PU being just as good (at high altitude).Wouter wrote: ↑09 Jul 2022, 12:13.Wazari wrote: ↑09 Jul 2022, 01:53I don't know what you are asking, "still is true?" If Honda has made a special turbo for higher altitudes, the answer is no. I have mentioned before that turbo design is critical. Not only size but the vanes of the turbine are IMO extremely important to drive the compressor and H unit. I campaigned very hard to get the Honda/GE jet engine division involved in the turbine design and that is "special". I do believe Honda has a very well designed turbocharger.
Hi @Wazari,
A few years ago, RBR always had an advantage when they had to ride on higher circuits (like Mexico) and it was said that it was because of the Honda Turbo.
In the meantime, another version of the Honda Turbo has been released and my question was therefore whether this Turbo also (still) has an advantage on higher circuits.
I personally don't think high altitude effective PU ever was a thing. If you look at the races at high altitude, it often was also just a race where aero was important. Take Mexico.. long straights so people think it's about the PU. But it really isn't.