Any strategist should be able to assume their drive can execute a stop without issue. And 99.9% of the time, Leclerc is able to do that.
He didn't, for a fault that was is own.
Any strategist should be able to assume their drive can execute a stop without issue. And 99.9% of the time, Leclerc is able to do that.
The race to get back to 5th was high risk. Calling him in a for a pitstop?JordanMugen wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 17:02It's low risk with a 30 second gap, but Charles actually lost the place to Fernando, no, and had to race hard to get it back? Seems like a risky rather than low risk call, especially when the driver himself was not keen to pit for FL attempt.
i get that but ...Juzh wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 17:10There was debris in silverstone that took him out of contention. Otherwise when you start last just about any unusual thing will benefit you in most cases, especially safety cars.Shal_Leg16 wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 17:02like till lap 3 ...Leclerc was right behind Max ...but as always some sh*t has to happen something wrong with breaks and he had to pit. This rarely happens with Max . let him start from 20th or 1st any sh*t ever happend that always helps him. i rarely remember any incident that not helping him or not destroying his opponent.
not getting you are critical of team or drivers.selvam_e2002 wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 17:31Ferrari need to forgot wcc wdc. Now I understand how Alonso bring close fight to rb in 2010 2012 with worst car. They need some one like Alonso to challenge Rb.
I don't even think they will win in 2023 and beyond
To be honest - i don't know if its really hillarious. Maybe its the right thing to do. Ferrari has zero chance now to win any title and it does not matter if Ferrari will be 2nd or 3rd in the WCC. Concentratinh the efforts on 2023 probably is smarter than trying to win something you do not have any chance for. Of course this would be controversial and disappointing for the fans, but it would also be a reasonable move i think.Xyz22 wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 17:41Binotto already talking about 2023.
Hilarious
Leclerc's main pit limiter sensor was busted.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/ferra ... /10359739/
This team will never win. There is just too much incompetence.Andi76 wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 19:47To be honest - i don't know if its really hillarious. Maybe its the right thing to do. Ferrari has zero chance now to win any title and it does not matter if Ferrari will be 2nd or 3rd in the WCC. Concentratinh the efforts on 2023 probably is smarter than trying to win something you do not have any chance for. Of course this would be controversial and disappointing for the fans, but it would also be a reasonable move i think.Xyz22 wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 17:41Binotto already talking about 2023.
Hilarious
Leclerc's main pit limiter sensor was busted.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/ferra ... /10359739/
I agree that its the new TD that heavily impacts Ferrari if they will be behind by a significant margin. But at the moment, i hardly doubt it. Ferrari was far behind RB in qualifying, but still as far ahead of the others teams as usual. So it was not like Ferrari suddenly was slower. RB suddenly was much faster. The temperatures were also low, something Ferrari had always problem with in 2022. But we will see what theory is right in Zandvort.Xyz22 wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 19:53This team will never win. There is just too much incompetence.Andi76 wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 19:47To be honest - i don't know if its really hillarious. Maybe its the right thing to do. Ferrari has zero chance now to win any title and it does not matter if Ferrari will be 2nd or 3rd in the WCC. Concentratinh the efforts on 2023 probably is smarter than trying to win something you do not have any chance for. Of course this would be controversial and disappointing for the fans, but it would also be a reasonable move i think.Xyz22 wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 17:41Binotto already talking about 2023.
Hilarious
Leclerc's main pit limiter sensor was busted.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/ferra ... /10359739/
Also if Ferraril will be behind by a significative margin in the next race it means they were heavily impacted by the new TD, highlighting 0 political power and being incapable of reacting with upgrades just like 2017, 2018 and 2019.
Wow, a genuine rational assessment. A breath of fresh air.Andi76 wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 20:18
I agree that its the new TD that heavily impacts Ferrari if they will be behind by a significant margin. But at the moment, i hardly doubt it. Ferrari was far behind RB in qualifying, but still as far ahead of the others teams as usual. So it was not like Ferrari suddenly was slower. RB suddenly was much faster. The temperatures were also low, something Ferrari had always problem with in 2022. But we will see what theory is right in Zandvort.
I completely disagree with your first statement. 2 years ago Ferrari was a midfield-team. Within 2 years they had the fastest car. One cannot deny they made a huge step forward, numbers don't lie. Of course they need to improve in many areas, like strategy and organisation of race weekends. But bringing a team to the highest standards in F1 takes time. Mercedes needed 4 years. Red Bull 5 years, Renault 4 years and McLaren in the early 90's even 6 years. Even Jean Todt/Ross Brawn/Rory Byrne/Michael Schumacher were not able to do this overnight. At the end of the day Ferrari made a big step forward in the last two years and technically they are already at the top, together with Red Bull. They cannot be incompetent obviously. Imcompetence isn't something that makes this possible. And two years are not enough to bring a midfieldteam to the top. No one ever did this in F1. But the next step has to be done. Strengthening the Strategy Departement and Organisation at race weekends is needed. Procedures and disciplines have to be introduced. But this needs some time. Time will tell if Ferrari is able to do that. But two things are for sure - they are not incompetent. Incompetence does not build a car as fast as the F1-75. And they improved and made a big step forward - numbers clearly prove that. Everything else is the last, infamous "10 percent" that a championship-winning team needs.
Finally i need to add that Ferraris situation reminds me of 1996, even if Ferrari today is even more sucessfull. Everyone called for changes and people to get fired. They wanted Jean Todts head on a plate...what would have happened if Todt wouldn't have been given the time necessary to properly rebuild Ferrari? Todays situation is very similar. And as in 1996 - Ferrari just needs time. Like every other team in F1 history did. No has ever been able to rebuild a team technically, organisationally and mentally(what also is a huge part of sucess) in 2 years only.
I disagree with such a statement