What you don't seem to understand is the fact that bias is a matter of perspective. Let's say I were to hold the opinion that the only reasonable punishment for the Red Bulls cost cap was to force them to use 2015 Honda engines, have Horners dogs shot, and Verstappen banned from ever racing anything with an engine. Then those arguing to have RB disqualified from the championship would, in my twisted mind, be biased towards Red Bull. I would however, be a crackpot with zero contribution to the forum.yamahasho wrote: ↑22 Nov 2022, 15:54Turning to name calling by the mods clearly shows the mods need to reevaluate how they govern the threads. Oh wait you said “being” so again not a direct statement. Does it matter? Get to the point.
The mods have had every opportunity to show they’re not bias toward protecting Red Bull and only one cleared it up.
All of the Red Bull bashing posts have been deleted so it’s not so much these actions but the cover up and the constant dodging of the initial post.
Yes I am bias toward the underdog in any situation but since the initial poster doesn’t have direct evidence because the mods deleted it and people with authority who cannot give clear responses.
I think other posters can shutdown any hating or crossfire, I think eventually things will level out. Mods should give it a chance.
I'm not really sure what you are looking for. Most of us hang out in this forum because we like it here. We like the discussions and we like the way they are moderated. For repeated opinions without underlaying arguments, Reddit is the place to go.
