McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
03 Jan 2023, 23:07
the EDGE wrote:
03 Jan 2023, 22:30
On a side note, I have always found it strange the Ferrari leak so much information about the upcoming cars, I used to be very sceptical of any rumours, given how secretive the world of F1 is, but I’ve come to learn that these leaks usually turn out to be true, to some extent
Not sure Italians are known as being very discreet :mrgreen:

At least half the rumors for any team are always "enhanced" by journous, so if we look past the numbers and buzz words and focus on the main things - its usually close to the truth.
A good meal and copious wine does not help discression when you are enthusiastic about something, and most Italians seem partial to all three. (me too :mrgreen: )
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
365
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
03 Jan 2023, 15:25
the EDGE wrote:
03 Jan 2023, 13:51
Legal? Apparently, fair? That’s up to individuals to decide for themselves
What would be unfair about homologating highest power you reached and then looking for reliability step by step?
Vanja I know you're not naive :lol:. Normally these things are entrenched in political controversy, but since everyone is doing it, everyone just looks the other way.
A lion must kill its prey.

User avatar
Vanja #66
1562
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
04 Jan 2023, 00:22
Vanja I know you're not naive :lol:. Normally these things are entrenched in political controversy, but since everyone is doing it, everyone just looks the other way.
The first thing that came to my mind when I read about development freeze was exactly this - drive the engine to the limit, homologate with highest power and torque and then work on reliability while using lower power settings. It was reported Mercedes had a bit more power available with 3rd PU due to reliability upgrades. I can't imagine a single team missing this. :)
And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

User avatar
ME4ME
79
Joined: 19 Dec 2014, 16:37

Re: McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

Post

I think they have increased the requirements for acceptence of reliability upgrades. The manufacturers have to pretty open not only to the FIA but also to their competiters with what they plan to do and why. So there is a risk of technology-transfer if the choose to upgrade. Rival manufacturers apparently also get a say in if an reliabilty upgrade is fair and necessary or not. It's been reported that they often avoid blocking each others upgrades and let the FIA decide, and expect the favor in return. Basically to avoid a political mess. So it shouldn't quite be like you make it sound that anything goes.

User avatar
Vanja #66
1562
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

Post

Yeah, I also mentioned the approval of other teams for any update, it's not at all that anything goes - but there is wiggling room. And it's all fair, legal and in the spirit of regulation in my view.

Vanja #66 wrote:
03 Jan 2023, 21:50
All four manufacturers will bring reliability updates that will allow them to reach desired reliability in ever higher power modes. All those updates take time to get cleared and must be cleared by other three makers as well, not just the FIA.
And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

Post

ME4ME wrote:
04 Jan 2023, 13:02
I think they have increased the requirements for acceptence of reliability upgrades. The manufacturers have to pretty open not only to the FIA but also to their competiters with what they plan to do and why. So there is a risk of technology-transfer if the choose to upgrade. Rival manufacturers apparently also get a say in if an reliabilty upgrade is fair and necessary or not. It's been reported that they often avoid blocking each others upgrades and let the FIA decide, and expect the favor in return. Basically to avoid a political mess. So it shouldn't quite be like you make it sound that anything goes.
But if a team (say Merc) introduce something on their engine and another team (say Ferrari) find out about it, as the engines can be changed for reliability only, the other teams will not be able to gain anything from it as they can not change their engine except for reliability issues. There is nothing to lose by showing things off

This is of course assuming the affected part on the engine is not the same on both cars, which has to be unlikely
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
365
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

Post

Big Tea wrote:
04 Jan 2023, 16:11
ME4ME wrote:
04 Jan 2023, 13:02
I think they have increased the requirements for acceptence of reliability upgrades. The manufacturers have to pretty open not only to the FIA but also to their competiters with what they plan to do and why. So there is a risk of technology-transfer if the choose to upgrade. Rival manufacturers apparently also get a say in if an reliabilty upgrade is fair and necessary or not. It's been reported that they often avoid blocking each others upgrades and let the FIA decide, and expect the favor in return. Basically to avoid a political mess. So it shouldn't quite be like you make it sound that anything goes.
But if a team (say Merc) introduce something on their engine and another team (say Ferrari) find out about it, as the engines can be changed for reliability only, the other teams will not be able to gain anything from it as they can not change their engine except for reliability issues. There is nothing to lose by showing things off
Exactly! It's a "look the other way" affair.

and in a shameless attempt to discuss the MCL37, maybe the MCL37 adopts some characteristics of the W13 for which the engine was designed for.
A lion must kill its prey.

User avatar
ME4ME
79
Joined: 19 Dec 2014, 16:37

Re: McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

Post

Big Tea wrote:
04 Jan 2023, 16:11
But if a team (say Merc) introduce something on their engine and another team (say Ferrari) find out about it, as the engines can be changed for reliability only, the other teams will not be able to gain anything from it as they can not change their engine except for reliability issues. There is nothing to lose by showing things off

This is of course assuming the affected part on the engine is not the same on both cars, which has to be unlikely
It's a mechanism of showing your cards at which point a rival can call into question an upgrades' purpose. I disagree that information and display of the workings and technology of a rivals engine has no value; learnings and insights can go directly into the development of future power units such as the 2026 one. I even think its not unthinkable that learnings can go into the current units as well, not as a specific fix but more as an understanding of a problem area and a rivals approach at solving it.

User avatar
Vanja #66
1562
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
04 Jan 2023, 16:38
and in a shameless attempt to discuss the MCL37, maybe the MCL37 adopts some characteristics of the W13 for which the engine was designed for.
Image

:mrgreen:
And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

User avatar
continuum16
49
Joined: 30 Nov 2015, 17:35
Location: Kansas

Re: McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

Post

Quite random but I would expect them to focus on maximizing the DRS effect with the new endplate-less rear wings. In 2020 and 2021 they were very good in this area, hence why they always performed well in places like Austria where every straight is a DRS zone. In 2022 RB had a similar advantage, while McLaren was one of the slowest on most tracks on the straights, with or without DRS open.

Otherwise I expect fairly different sidepods (probably Red Bull style, based on their developments) and a completely redesigned floor. McLaren had one of, if not the most complex floor edges on the grid, while the actual tunnels, inlet, and diffuser were significantly less complex than, say, Red Bull (as were most teams tbh).

Raising the floor edges might significantly compromise/ruin whatever complicated flow structures they were trying to achieve in 2022.

Oh, and all that with the old wind tunnel, so if it doesn’t work you know what the reasoning is going to be :lol:
"You can't argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience"
- Mark Twain

User avatar
Blackout
1566
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

Post

scarbs wrote:
29 Dec 2022, 19:47
They'll adopt a water/air intercooler, losing the big sidepod mounted intercoolers. This should open up some opportunities to repackage the very long radiator set up from last year.
So this is an info, not just speculation?

That's the first obvious step IMO: To use the Merc water-air interccoler that was designed for that compressor, and is used by every other Mercedes team, instead of those air-air ones and their 20 miles-long pipes.

Their cockpit is very rearwards like RB, so MCL could take advantage of this in 2023 and copy the other RB tricks to extract more performance from that design choice.

They could push the now smaller cooling package backwards an put it in a more normal position, and move the lower side impact structures from the sidepods to inside the floor to get bigger sidepod front undercuts.

Their 2022 sidepods were very busy and did host most of the systems, while their splitter/bib area was empty because it was an ultra slim splitter.
In 2023 it could be the other way around if they follow RB.

Image

Image

I wonder if they'll keep the same monocoque design. They could do that to retain the low fuel tank and low CoG. I dont think they need to dig the sides of the tub for the repositionned cooling. Their packaging would be similar to Ferrari.

Image

User avatar
Blackout
1566
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

Post

13.02?

haza
haza
7
Joined: 18 May 2015, 23:14

Re: McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

Post



Is that a side pod inlet ?

the EDGE
the EDGE
67
Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 18:31
Location: Bedfordshire ENGLAND

Re: McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

Post

haza wrote:
13 Jan 2023, 20:52


Is that a side pod inlet ?
I can see why you would say that, but I doubt it, that would be too much to reveal

I don’t believe the top and bottom parts of the structure are connected, despite what it looks like

Maybe the bottom part is some sort of stand

scarbs
scarbs
393
Joined: 08 Oct 2003, 09:47
Location: Hertfordshire, UK

Re: McLaren MCL37 speculation thread

Post

haza wrote:
13 Jan 2023, 20:52


Is that a side pod inlet ?
It's a seat, but upside down