My thoughts exactlyGround Effect wrote: ↑24 Feb 2023, 13:59Scott Mitchell-Malm.... like I said yesterday, these guys just go by "vibes and feelings", just vague reasoning, quite shocking really. They could end up being right, things may not be well at McLaren, but it's so obvious these guys are just guessing and hedging bets, all based on Stella's misconstrued comments at the launch.Emag wrote: ↑24 Feb 2023, 13:53Is that from Gary Anderson, or from Edd Straw?Ground Effect wrote: ↑24 Feb 2023, 13:39It gets better... From The Race testing live blog
McLaren in trouble?
I’ve sought refuge from the sun (the press conferences are coming up soon, that’s my excuse).
I’d caution my observations even more than last night’s because I was there for a little less time, but I continue to be concerned by the McLaren.
It just looks really difficult there. If Norris was running a very high fuel load it would mitigate it to a degree but even so, the MCL60 does not look like the leader of the midfield pack by a long shot - I’d put the Aston Martin in front there.
Not like it makes a difference, but I want to measure by how much I should ignore their comments.
They've built a narrative around Stella's "not entirely happy" comment
And now it's just plain old confirmation bias.