This is a very common gripe for folks whose teams are currently losing that also completely misses the point of the technical regulations, which is to make the actual on track racing closer. The feedback from drivers is it generally did.zeroday wrote: ↑25 Feb 2023, 02:58One cant help but wonder then what the whole point of the large regulation changes were ultimately for if we may (likely) be stuck with the same fundamental problem which it was intended to solve: the same team(s) dominating. And apparently, as you pointed out, playing catch-up is very hard to do because the leader(s) would "reestablish the gap".organic wrote: ↑25 Feb 2023, 00:01It was more like 4 tenths at a regular track. Abu Dhabi (7 tenths off) seemed to be particularly bad for Merc, whilst Brazil and Mexico's high altitudes favoured their car. Throw in RB and Ferrari stopping development of their cars much earlier than Mercedes (RB's final upgrade was spa for instance) and it's tricky to catch up. It's what you saw for years before when RB would close up at the end of the year and Merc would come with their new car and reestablish the gap. It's just hard to catch up
So, with the new regs we now have slower, heavier, bouncier cars with the same pre-reg problems.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The aero sliding scale and budget cap are meant to level the field in time, but stamping out the legacy advantage of top teams in facilities, personnel and more abstractly, expertise just doesn't happen overnight.