they would have done it faster than to BakuSmallSoldier wrote: ↑26 Feb 2023, 18:51Front wing and floor edge are 2022 spec… So those 2 would be my first bets
I was wondering about the front wing.. lots of 'trick' ideas have been shown in the test on various cars. Makes total sense for a fw to come thereforeSmallSoldier wrote: ↑26 Feb 2023, 18:51Front wing and floor edge are 2022 spec… So those 2 would be my first bets
From what I understand from the article on the Race, they’ve been working on the new ‘development direction’ for 2 or 3 month, and the current car represents where they were when the stopped developing it, and started on the new packageorganic wrote: ↑26 Feb 2023, 18:57I was wondering about the front wing.. lots of 'trick' ideas have been shown in the test on various cars. Makes total sense for a fw to come thereforeSmallSoldier wrote: ↑26 Feb 2023, 18:51Front wing and floor edge are 2022 spec… So those 2 would be my first bets
I agree, I think it will be all but a B-Specthe EDGE wrote: ↑26 Feb 2023, 19:22From what I understand from the article on the Race, they’ve been working on the new ‘development direction’ for 2 or 3 month, and the current car represents where they were when the stopped developing it, and started on the new packageorganic wrote: ↑26 Feb 2023, 18:57I was wondering about the front wing.. lots of 'trick' ideas have been shown in the test on various cars. Makes total sense for a fw to come thereforeSmallSoldier wrote: ↑26 Feb 2023, 18:51
Front wing and floor edge are 2022 spec… So those 2 would be my first bets
Presumably that’s why certain aspects of the mcl 60 are last years spec
That means, by the time it hits the track it would have had 4, maybe even 5 months of work.
They say it’s not going to be a B-spec, so I assume that the chassis remains the same, but otherwise I would expect a complete aero re-work from the floor up
They are making too much of it for it just to be upgrades like a new floor edge, or front wing. That’s just normal in-season development. You wouldn’t stop work on designing a new car for that
So he can leave then. Noone is bigger than team. Ricciardo was supposed to be the next big thing for us, and what happened? Nothing, we moved on. He wouldn't have even been in the frame if once highly rated Vandoorne wasn't left to play an understudy to Alonso in a dog of a car, and lost the fight.Szabi1112 wrote: ↑25 Feb 2023, 20:33What an amateur team we are. Poor Lando he refused Red Bull 2 times. Come on Lando! Leave us! We would like to see you winning WC.Venturiation wrote: ↑25 Feb 2023, 20:26here is the video very sadEmag wrote: ↑25 Feb 2023, 19:52Will Buxton reporting that he saw Lando punch through a wall. Not sure how we should take this, because he does play a key part in dts ...
Either way, it would be such a shame to lose a star driver like Lando. But at the same time, it would be injustice to keep him tied here if McLaren doesn't deliver.
That's a lot if words to say "McLaren high drag". Guess they need to hit their page visit time quota.Lucky wrote: ↑26 Feb 2023, 15:32The relationship between air resistance and contact pressure was already a construction site last year. Even the old MCL36 was not a car for a good compromise. Either it was reasonable in the corners and slow on the straights. Or vice versa. Alpine was one step ahead of the Papaya racer in this discipline.
The new McLaren also generates too much air resistance for the generated downforce. You are not the hit in the curves and yet you put too much surface in the wind on the straights. The GPS data reveals that McLaren has not really made any real progress compared to the fastest in any type of curve.
https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... -verfehlt/
Well said. I wish nothing but failure for him and Audi. Hopefully another Toyota, BMW, Honda type of entry.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑26 Feb 2023, 18:02No we won’t know, unless you can either read minds or are in Seidl’s most inner circle and he discloses that… We can create any conspiracy theory we want, of course having a rough start to the season feeds a narrative like that.AR3-GP wrote: ↑26 Feb 2023, 17:36How do we know that Seidl didn't run to avoid the embarrassment that he must have had a hand in? A long stay with Mclaren could have damaged his reputation, even if Mclaren's results were the result of his own leadership. Surely one can see this angle?
Seidl is highly lauded for his success with the Porsche LMP1 but how do we know he is capable of turning an F1 team around?
But we seem to forget when Seidl leaves McLaren or better said, accept Sauber’s proposal… It was before the announcement in December and there at that point in time development of the MCL60 was still in early stages, so the current struggles weren’t part of the decision… Seidl’s move happened quicker because of Binotto’s exit and Vasseur’s move to Ferrari.
The fact that people pushing a narrative in which Seidl leaves because of the early struggles of the MCL60 seem that they purposely want to dismiss that:
- He is getting a CEO role… Not in Sauber but for Audi.
- A CEO role is a big promotion from been Team Principal and is actually the same role that Zak fills in McLaren
- Beyond the role and pay (which probably isn’t anything to laugh at), it can be very exciting to lead a project like Audi’s… A Manufacturer not much different than Mercedes.
This is where I'm going! It would have been an awful culmination of his years there. Like what happen Andreas?!! Where did it all go wrong?AR3-GP wrote: ↑26 Feb 2023, 17:36How do we know that Seidl didn't run to avoid the embarrassment that he must have had a hand in? A long stay with Mclaren could have damaged his reputation, even if Mclaren's results were the result of his own leadership. Surely one can see this angle?
Seidl is highly lauded for his success with the Porsche LMP1 but how do we know he is capable of turning an F1 team around?
I don't think your Seidl decision making idea is accurate. Think it's very simple. Guys he used to work with offered him a promotion from the position he held at McLaren.genarro wrote: ↑26 Feb 2023, 17:56You need a tin foil hat my friendPlatinumZealot wrote: ↑26 Feb 2023, 16:01This is the thing. The actual team at Hinwill is already there! Unless there will be sweeping job cuts, and I don't see that happening with the type of close-nit culture at Hinwill. The only "team" that Seidl would be building is the same old group of Audi technical heads that are already there from LMP category an the engine guys which are already there too. I have a feeling that Seidl saw the writing on the wall at McLaren - it was clearly a two popes situation and big dilution of focus - and decided there was no point in staying on for 2023.