What? Alonso was miles quicker than sainz but spent 2 stints in essentially traffic.Artur Craft wrote: ↑05 Mar 2023, 19:13So, race pace wise, we got:
RB >>> Leclerc >>Sainz~=Alonso >Mercedes
Who cares about 2nd-4th???
I care because that is all I have to look forward to this season
Maybe that´s right but I´m not fully convinced because Alonso had a hard time passing Mercedes. Towards the end, yes, he was quite quicker than Carlos but I don´t know if that would have happened the whole race. But Sainz was like 0.5s/lap slower than Shal. By lap 22, I noticed the difference between them was around 13s!organic wrote: ↑05 Mar 2023, 19:25What? Alonso was miles quicker than sainz but spent 2 stints in essentially traffic.Artur Craft wrote: ↑05 Mar 2023, 19:13So, race pace wise, we got:
RB >>> Leclerc >>Sainz~=Alonso >Mercedes
Did they not work on the 22 car during the 21 season then like all the other teams? i am sure i have heard Horner him self say they have started working on the 22 car during the 21 season....
He had a hard time passing because the Aston Martin has a ton of downforce, but it's not as efficient as the RB. The Mercedes and Ferrari were very fast down the straights, but they have no downforce and destroyed their tires after 5 laps.Artur Craft wrote: ↑05 Mar 2023, 20:02Maybe that´s right but I´m not fully convinced because Alonso had a hard time passing Mercedes. Towards the end, yes, he was quite quicker than Carlos but I don´t know if that would have happened the whole race. But Sainz was like 0.5s/lap slower than Shal. By lap 22, I noticed the difference between them was around 13s!organic wrote: ↑05 Mar 2023, 19:25What? Alonso was miles quicker than sainz but spent 2 stints in essentially traffic.Artur Craft wrote: ↑05 Mar 2023, 19:13So, race pace wise, we got:
RB >>> Leclerc >>Sainz~=Alonso >Mercedes
May be Aston can think of trimming down some rear wing and see how that helps on top speed vs impact on downforce/tyre life. Hopefully, their development path also has elements that reduce some more overall drag that can also help.AR3-GP wrote: ↑06 Mar 2023, 01:58He had a hard time passing because the Aston Martin has a ton of downforce, but it's not as efficient as the RB. The Mercedes and Ferrari were very fast down the straights, but they have no downforce and destroyed their tires after 5 laps.Artur Craft wrote: ↑05 Mar 2023, 20:02Maybe that´s right but I´m not fully convinced because Alonso had a hard time passing Mercedes. Towards the end, yes, he was quite quicker than Carlos but I don´t know if that would have happened the whole race. But Sainz was like 0.5s/lap slower than Shal. By lap 22, I noticed the difference between them was around 13s!
Look at the race runs for AM from FP2 and pre-season. They translated to the race. Alonso could have challenged Leclerc and imo (I know some won't agree), he would have beaten Leclerc on pace (but perhaps struggled to overtake due to the Ferrari 325km/h top speed and PU).
Sainz never got away from Hamilton either, the distance between them never went beyond 4s even with Hamilton in heavy administration mode, most of the time around 3s.organic wrote: ↑05 Mar 2023, 19:25What? Alonso was miles quicker than sainz but spent 2 stints in essentially traffic.Artur Craft wrote: ↑05 Mar 2023, 19:13So, race pace wise, we got:
RB >>> Leclerc >>Sainz~=Alonso >Mercedes
Give this man a medal.