2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
User avatar
codetower
6
Joined: 15 Sep 2020, 16:47

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Andi76 wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 14:48

The SF-23 is fast without question. In qualifying, you can see the pure speed of a car. However, Ferrari has two huge problems ...
Thank you for the post, Andi (I trimmed it up for space). This definitely clears things up a bit.

I'm not as Doom-and-gloom as others here, but it was a little disheartening. Was hoping for some good LEC vs VER racing like last year. I do see some positives though. The car is fast, only one race but strategy and pit stops were good, All the Ferrari power units did well, and Charles can still drive the hell out of the car.

I do have one question though hopefully some can help with, maybe @Vanja. Porpoising still seems to be an issue with low fuel. Is this something that will hurt over the season? Can it be fixed? We know the Zeropod was a bust, could it be that the "100" pods like the Ferrari (they seem to have the widest pods on the grid) could be trimmed down a bit? Or maybe the air-flow breaks too far forward in the car, should be further back?

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
365
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

They need Rory back.
A lion must kill its prey.

Andi76
Andi76
431
Joined: 03 Feb 2021, 20:19

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

FDD wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 15:31
Andi76 wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 14:48
Shal_Leg16 wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 12:01


You are expecting too much imo. Forget about the DNF but the way these rival cars wizz past that Ferrari and built a comfortable gap within few laps is shocking.
I am starting to feel that only reason Ferrari is up there behind RBs in race is because everyone else is shyt. Hypothetically Say by few months if Mercs come up better Aero/sidepod concept I feel Ferrari would struggle for podiums forget about wins
The SF-23 is fast without question. In qualifying, you can see the pure speed of a car. However, Ferrari has two huge problems - they can't use the car's speed in the race, because as soon as they push, the tires literally burn. And here we are with problem one. On the one hand, they said that the car is exactly as the simulator predicted. Everyone was positive. But then on the weekend there was suddenly talk of correlation issues. Contradictory, isn't it? No. Both are true. The SF-23 is exactly as it should be. What is not true and where there are correlation issues is when the tires come into play. And that is Ferrari's big problem. The origin is at the end of the Todt/Brawn/Byrne/Schumacher era with which the tire war ended. Di Montezemolo wanted to transfer all the engineers (6 or 7 if I remember correctly) when the tire war was over and there was no Brawn or Byrne left, and dissolve the Tire Dynamics department, a sub-department of Vehicle Dynamics, whose only task was to ensure that tires, chassis, suspension and aerodynamics were perfectly matched already in the design phase. This was prevented for a short time, but in 2008 it happened anyway. Pat Fry insisted then however that Hammy of Bridegestone was hired and until 2012 or 2013 he alone cared about it. Since then there is no such departement and not one single person at Ferrari who works on that. Accordingly, Ferrari's tire model leaves a lot to be desired and during the design process, the tire is no longer included in the vehicle design in any way, as it should be. Adrian Newey insisted on such a department when he joined Red Bull and it still exists today. Aston Martin has also set up such a department, while all the other teams work according to Ferrari's philosophy - the tires are the same for everyone, it's all about tuning...so Red Bull is light years ahead of everyone else, because everything on the car is designed in interaction with the tires right from the start. And that's why Ferrari's tires overheat immediately even though they've changed the suspension, etc., but there are a lot more things involved.
Most fans and even engineers who don't work in Formula 1 underestimate how incredibly complicated it is to keep an F1 tire in the right temperature window, both in qualifying and in the race. And being able to do that perfectly brings an incredible amount of performance. This is the fastest way to find the most time, but it's also incredibly difficult and complex. So is the modeling.

Ferrari's second problem is that people like Binotto (or now Vasseur) or Cardille or Sanchez can't do what they want. Every week either Elkan, Vigna or Pierro Lardi Ferrari come along and overturn development plans and tell the engineers what has to be done. Binotto, for example, wanted to do a few things differently on the SF-23, as well as introduce a few new things last year. Elkan was against it. In the Todt/Brawn/Byrne/Schumacher days, that kind of thing didn't happen. Brawn had in his contract that he had full technical responsibility and he insisted on that, which led to a dispute between him and Montezemolo. But without Brawn, Schumacher, Byrne and Todt would have left. So the team was run by people who knew their stuff and could do what they wanted. Development plans were followed and only changed if it brought a technical advantage and it was worked calmly in one direction and not today here and tomorrow there. That's Ferrari's second big problem and even a Newey couldn't make a difference under these circumstances.

But the SF-23 is a very fast car in itself. The problem is the tires and Ferrari's approach to them. The car is aerodynamically very efficient and not much slower than the Red Bull. It's the tires that slow down the SF-23 and give the RB19 wings in the race, and this is where Ferrari needs to put all its effort in to improve. Certainly, they will always be at a disadvantage, as the Red Bull was "designed" for this in the design phase, while Ferrari can only optimize with the suspension and set-up. But if you finally understand this mistake (which is less on the engineers than on the "Ferrari bosses) immediately make the necessary investments and appoint the right people to finally close the gap in this area.

One must also take into account that the SF-23 is not yet "finished". Binotto was the technical director and the only one who knew practically "everything" and where everything came together. An aerodynamics package will be coming soon, which will further improve the SF-23 and also help in the area of tires. Ferrari will then already be a good distance away from Mercedes, which will be difficult to catch up. Especially since it doesn't mean that just because Mercedes brings a new concept or copies existing ones or whatever, that they'll make a giant leap because of it, because they don't really know what their problem is, which will make it difficult to get close to Ferrari in the normal case. Unfortunately, "normal case" at Ferrari is always not so simple, because much will depend on how much Elkan, Vigna &Co. hold back and how much Binotto was still willing to ensure that nothing is lost....
Methodical explanation of the management "environment" in GES, AS IT IS ! ! !
I think that this is a simple problem to solve, since they have two different "case studies".
On the other side it is not so simple if we consider the ego of Elkan, Vigna etc, which is a very sad situation.
Unfortunately it is not as simple to solve at it seems. The problem here is that the bosses see this as unnecessary and dismiss it as nonsense, because everyone has the same tires. Also, R&D must be done here accordingly because you want to have the best solution. So it's not just about a little thing, but also about investment. In addition, you need your own department with at least two people. But the bosses refused, until at some point nobody talked about it anymore...

Red Bull is years ahead in this field. And it's a technology in itself to model a tire perfectly, at least at F1 standards and you also need special tools and equipment. But I don't want to spread pessimism now. Of course, you can achieve a lot here with good methodical work. However, it is important for the future to make a change and improvement here. Many things influence degradation and wear and this must already be taken into account in the design of the chassis, the aerodynamics, the suspension geometry, the dampers, the braking system, etc. and everything needs to be designed to the requirements and/or the right trade-offs made. You need a separate department or at least two engineers who don't care about anything else and ensure this. But anyway - the SF-23 is a correspondingly fast car that if you manage to adjust the suspension and the set-up accordingly, as well as the final aerodynamics, you can get into a window where you can fight with Red Bull with a clever strategy.

Amusing I find now however the reports which speak of a completely wrong correlation of the simulator. The typical Italian scaremongering! Unfortunately, this scaremongering often has corresponding effects on the Ferrari bosses.
Last edited by Andi76 on 06 Mar 2023, 22:12, edited 1 time in total.

Andi76
Andi76
431
Joined: 03 Feb 2021, 20:19

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 16:38
They need Rory back.
Rory is still there as an adviser and helped them with the SF-23 from Thailand. The problem is that the best engineer can't do anything if he isn't given the necessary resources, or the bosses sometimes force people to do something that goes in the wrong direction. Even a Rory Byrne can't do magic, especially "only" from Thailand. And in view of that you have to say that the SF-23 is a very good car. It's not far off the Red Bull in terms of pure pace. In the race, unfortunately, the tires do not allow to use the speed as they literally "burn". But the car is not really "finished" yet either.
Last edited by Andi76 on 06 Mar 2023, 18:33, edited 1 time in total.

Venturiation
Venturiation
98
Joined: 04 Jan 2023, 19:48

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

they need to change concept , the SF23 is a failure like the W14 they had similar pace and both were almost 1,5 second slower than redbull on race pace

LostInTranslation
LostInTranslation
3
Joined: 06 Jun 2017, 22:15

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Jesus, what a depression there is here around!

The cosmic pessimism that hovers in these pages today is paired, in my opinion, with the immoderate euphoria of a year ago these days. Both are wrong, especially the second, as we have seen (even if 4 wins, 11 poles and 19 podiums speak of a season that was far from bankruptcy).

I can't believe that a team of engineers who designed the F1-75 (universally recognized as a good car) suddenly became donkeys.

The SF23 appears to be not a simple evolution, but not even a revolution of the previous model. I think we can speak about "re-evolution".

New wings, new suspensions, new sides, drag-reducing aerodynamics, new floor, etc.

Of course we need time to balance these new aspects.

The reliability of the PU doesn't seem as worrying to me as last year (where the engines were roasted). Alfa Romeo's glitch in testing and Charles' glitch on Sunday appear to be due to ERS, energy recovery, etc. All stuff that can be fixed better than the endothermic.

Wings, ground clearance and suspensions (especially) take some time to be fine-tuned. In their interaction, in their balance, perhaps lies the resolution of tire degradation.

Within the next 2/3 GPs we will know more, it is useless to wrap our heads before being hit.

Just one criticism: the rear wing. Both the single pylon and the double pylon ones were of medium-low load. I wonder: wasn't it really possible to bring one of them from last season (with double pylon) with a higher load and do some comparison tests, especially in terms of grip and degradation at the rear?

I have to think that the 'attachments' of the SF23 wing are different from those of the F1-75, otherwise I don't understand.

As a sign of optimism, I make a bold prediction: we will be better going in to season.

Hearts up.

Venturiation
Venturiation
98
Joined: 04 Jan 2023, 19:48

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

LostInTranslation wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 17:31
Jesus, what a depression there is here around!

The cosmic pessimism that hovers in these pages today is paired, in my opinion, with the immoderate euphoria of a year ago these days. Both are wrong, especially the second, as we have seen (even if 4 wins, 11 poles and 19 podiums speak of a season that was far from bankruptcy).

I can't believe that a team of engineers who designed the F1-75 (universally recognized as a good car) suddenly became donkeys.

The SF23 appears to be not a simple evolution, but not even a revolution of the previous model. I think we can speak about "re-evolution".

New wings, new suspensions, new sides, drag-reducing aerodynamics, new floor, etc.

Of course we need time to balance these new aspects.

The reliability of the PU doesn't seem as worrying to me as last year (where the engines were roasted). Alfa Romeo's glitch in testing and Charles' glitch on Sunday appear to be due to ERS, energy recovery, etc. All stuff that can be fixed better than the endothermic.

Wings, ground clearance and suspensions (especially) take some time to be fine-tuned. In their interaction, in their balance, perhaps lies the resolution of tire degradation.

Within the next 2/3 GPs we will know more, it is useless to wrap our heads before being hit.

Just one criticism: the rear wing. Both the single pylon and the double pylon ones were of medium-low load. I wonder: wasn't it really possible to bring one of them from last season (with double pylon) with a higher load and do some comparison tests, especially in terms of grip and degradation at the rear?

I have to think that the 'attachments' of the SF23 wing are different from those of the F1-75, otherwise I don't understand.

As a sign of optimism, I make a bold prediction: we will be better going in to season.

Hearts up.

all that doesn't matter
it's like saying mercedes won 8 titles in a row and the next car will be good but it isn't

Ferrari saw in the simulator that the SF23 is 1 second faster same that was seen with the 1 second faster zeropds last year
and now they discovered that the corellation is bad and the car has no front downforce
wich means they need to fix the tools first and understand where the corellation issue is coming from

they can't upgrade the car until that is fixed because any upgrade will disturb the understanding
they NEED time just like what happened to the W13

and when you see that redbull lower engine mode and asked drivers to go slower it just shows that even the 100% of SF23 won't come close to them, they are slower than aston martin in race pace

User avatar
codetower
6
Joined: 15 Sep 2020, 16:47

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Venturiation wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 17:24
they need to change concept , the SF23 is a failure like the W14 they had similar pace and both were almost 1,5 second slower than redbull on race pace
2nd fastest car on the grid is not a failure.

Venturiation
Venturiation
98
Joined: 04 Jan 2023, 19:48

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

codetower wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 17:39
Venturiation wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 17:24
they need to change concept , the SF23 is a failure like the W14 they had similar pace and both were almost 1,5 second slower than redbull on race pace
2nd fastest car on the grid is not a failure.
it's the 3rd fastest in race pace,
it is a failure when you stopped upgrading since july 2022 to focus on 2023
the car is the same qualifying looking closer and in the race destroying tyres, they had almost a year to fix that
and drivers still complain about bouncing when all teams have fixed it

LostInTranslation
LostInTranslation
3
Joined: 06 Jun 2017, 22:15

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

@ Venturiation

You seem to be a bird of doom... :)

Relax, the season is still very long, doesn't it?

User avatar
S D
12
Joined: 17 Mar 2022, 23:00
Location: Canada

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Venturiation wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 17:47
codetower wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 17:39
Venturiation wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 17:24
they need to change concept , the SF23 is a failure like the W14 they had similar pace and both were almost 1,5 second slower than redbull on race pace
2nd fastest car on the grid is not a failure.
it's the 3rd fastest in race pace,
it is a failure when you stopped upgrading since july 2022 to focus on 2023
the car is the same qualifying looking closer and in the race destroying tyres, they had almost a year to fix that
and drivers still complain about bouncing when all teams have fixed it
The rest of the teams that fixed it were behind.

User avatar
S D
12
Joined: 17 Mar 2022, 23:00
Location: Canada

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Let's review the consensus on which teams got it right...
2023 so far RB and AMR (and even they are far behind RB)
2022 RB and Ferrari at start
2021 RB and Merc
It's a short list which means that it's unfair to compare only to a short list of team(s) in front of you so harshly and then forget that they did a better job than 8 other teams that are behind them. Other than Merc who appear to have decided to bite the bullet and rethink their design is any other team capable of catching Ferrari this year?

Andi76
Andi76
431
Joined: 03 Feb 2021, 20:19

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Venturiation wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 17:24
they need to change concept , the SF23 is a failure like the W14 they had similar pace and both were almost 1,5 second slower than redbull on race pace
I don't think you can call a concept that was on par with Red Bull in 2022 (up to TD39) and partly the fastest (qualifying) and obviously still has a high qualifying pace a failure after only one race with high tire degradation. Even more so when parts of this concept are among the most copied at all. Sorry, but that's a bit far-fetched now.

It's not like Mercedes has been lagging behind for over a year and has obvious aerodynamic problems. And again - this concept was the fastest in 2022 in terms of pure speed (qualifying). And so far we've had one race on an exceptional course. To call a concept a failure after something like that - you can't really say anything about it. Sorry.
Venturiation wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 17:47
codetower wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 17:39
Venturiation wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 17:24
they need to change concept , the SF23 is a failure like the W14 they had similar pace and both were almost 1,5 second slower than redbull on race pace
2nd fastest car on the grid is not a failure.
it's the 3rd fastest in race pace,
it is a failure when you stopped upgrading since july 2022 to focus on 2023
the car is the same qualifying looking closer and in the race destroying tyres, they had almost a year to fix that
and drivers still complain about bouncing when all teams have fixed it
None of the drivers really complained about bouncing. If you mean Sainz's short question in the race - then pretty much every car should be a failure, because at some point during the weekend several drivers asked why the car was bouncing. Red Bull had even exceeded the readings.... So you're distorting the picture quite a bit. And the tires - that has rather little to do with the concept.

Venturiation
Venturiation
98
Joined: 04 Jan 2023, 19:48

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Andi76 wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 18:45
Venturiation wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 17:24
they need to change concept , the SF23 is a failure like the W14 they had similar pace and both were almost 1,5 second slower than redbull on race pace
I don't think you can call a concept that was on par with Red Bull in 2022 (up to TD39) and partly the fastest (qualifying) and obviously still has a high qualifying pace a failure after only one race with high tire degradation. Even more so when parts of this concept are among the most copied at all. Sorry, but that's a bit far-fetched now.

It's not like Mercedes has been lagging behind for over a year and has obvious aerodynamic problems. And again - this concept was the fastest in 2022 in terms of pure speed (qualifying). And so far we've had one race on an exceptional course. To call a concept a failure after something like that - you can't really say anything about it. Sorry.
Venturiation wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 17:47
codetower wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 17:39


2nd fastest car on the grid is not a failure.
it's the 3rd fastest in race pace,
it is a failure when you stopped upgrading since july 2022 to focus on 2023
the car is the same qualifying looking closer and in the race destroying tyres, they had almost a year to fix that
and drivers still complain about bouncing when all teams have fixed it
None of the drivers really complained about bouncing. If you mean Sainz's short question in the race - then pretty much every car should be a failure, because at some point during the weekend several drivers asked why the car was bouncing. Red Bull had even exceeded the readings....and the tires - that has rather little to do with the concept.
ferrari concept has no more potential it was close in 2022 only because redbull didn't push and knew they had both titles in the bag and mercedes was at same race pace as ferrari

in 2023 it's not enough the ferrari is too far back

dialtone
dialtone
121
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Andi76 wrote:
06 Mar 2023, 14:48
Ferrari's second problem is that people like Binotto (or now Vasseur) or Cardille or Sanchez can't do what they want. Every week either Elkan, Vigna or Pierro Lardi Ferrari come along and overturn development plans and tell the engineers what has to be done. Binotto, for example, wanted to do a few things differently on the SF-23, as well as introduce a few new things last year. Elkan was against it. In the Todt/Brawn/Byrne/Schumacher days, that kind of thing didn't happen. Brawn had in his contract that he had full technical responsibility and he insisted on that, which led to a dispute between him and Montezemolo. But without Brawn, Schumacher, Byrne and Todt would have left. So the team was run by people who knew their stuff and could do what they wanted. Development plans were followed and only changed if it brought a technical advantage and it was worked calmly in one direction and not today here and tomorrow there. That's Ferrari's second big problem and even a Newey couldn't make a difference under these circumstances.
I would love to hear more about this side. I hear this quoted often but literally never with an example or something to substantiate the claim, and I'm asking not so much because I don't believe you but specifically because I'd like to understand what kind of decisions do they get involved in.

I just can't see people like Montezemolo, as much as I dislike the guy, going in a technical meeting and with a straight face expect to make a call on the car setup, suspension layout and so on. I can see them making calls about structure of the organization or reporting of individuals and general personnel but definitely not technical.

Even your point about Binotto wanting to do some things different in SF-23 is a bit vague, what did Vigna do?