2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
User avatar
organic
1055
Joined: 08 Jan 2022, 02:24
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Well the timing of the Sanchez announcement didn't help - that gave the appearance that not all of it is hot air. In my opinion it seems like formu1a (Pg and Duchessa) may have been fed a false narrative by a faction within Ferrari who would gain from discontent within the team (who?). But time will likely tell what is truth and what isn't

FDD
FDD
81
Joined: 29 Mar 2019, 01:08

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

organic wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 20:41
Well the timing of the Sanchez announcement didn't help - that gave the appearance that not all of it is hot air. In my opinion it seems like formu1a (Pg and Duchessa) may have been fed a false narrative by a faction within Ferrari who would gain from discontent within the team (who?). But time will likely tell what is truth and what isn't
Does not look good to me, but I agree that we do not have, or better, we are not sure that info published by the media is 100% correct.
As you said, time will tell...

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
365
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

If there are competing "factions" within Ferrari, then somebody is going to end up on the outside eventually.
A lion must kill its prey.

dialtone
dialtone
121
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Changing topics back to racing:

Last year the race was lost because on hard tires, after the SC and VSC, LEC was simply unable to get the tires back to temperature as fast as RBR, even in quali Ferrari needed 2 warmup laps in both Jeddah and Australia. Aero efficiency is obviously critical.

This is last year's quali, PER v LEC:
Image

There are 2 slow corners where it's easy to see that mechanical grip matters most, every other corner is like T5-6-7 in Bahrain, fast corners where downforce matters.

On paper Ferrari should be great here, but that really depends on the gap in the slow corners, last year PER lost almost 0.25s just in the last corner, and 0.35s up till the back straight where LEC then lost 0.5s. T1 IMHO will be the real difference maker this year, in Bahrain Ferrari was losing 0.1s in quali and 0.2s+ in the race just in T1, traction out of T1 is less important here because the follow-on straight is short but still, at the end of the lap with no tires on T27 the car will be slow for sure so they really need to manage T1 well.

Also IMHO, the new rear wing only would make sense if it provides efficiency, losing top speed or better load to the rear isn't desirable judging by T5-6-7 in Bahrain.

All of this my opinion, probably wrong in more ways than one.

avantman
avantman
10
Joined: 07 Dec 2020, 19:17

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

dialtone wrote:
15 Mar 2023, 07:29
Last year the race was lost because on hard tires, after the SC and VSC, LEC was simply unable to get the tires back to temperature as fast as RBR, even in quali Ferrari needed 2 warmup laps in both Jeddah and Australia. Aero efficiency is obviously critical.
First of all thanks for you analyzes dialtone, great stuff!
In terms of tire warm-up last year in Jeddah, I'd argue it was more about particular driver's comfort, feel and setup nuances.
Charles tried both 1 and 2 warm-up laps throughout quali last year, he set his fastest lap on the 2nd run in Q3 after 2 warm-up laps indeed, he was slower by 0,2s on his 1st run doing just 1 warm-up lap. But Sainz on the contrary whilst being on the same strategy in Q3 failed to improve on his 2nd run(after 2 warm-up lap), he ran 0,45s slower, struggled for grip and couldn't explain why later talking to the media. Sainz was even a bit quicker than Charles on the 1st run in Q3.
It wasn't the same for the Red bull drivers either. Perez needed just 1 warm-up lap throughout quali. But Max struggled with warm-up clearly, he needed 2 warm-up laps on the opposite all day, including both runs in Q3.

Watching Charles and Max onboards after the final restart, I noticed Max pushed simply harder, he risked more, came closer to the walls everywhere to stay in the DRS range. I'm not sure Ferrari really struggled with the warm-up more than Red bull. The top speed advantage with the DRS open was the biggest factor, otherwise Charles could've re-passed him again, as we saw he wasn't slower at all until the chequered flag.

User avatar
organic
1055
Joined: 08 Jan 2022, 02:24
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Charles would've also likely won without the yellow flag

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
365
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

dialtone wrote:
15 Mar 2023, 07:29
Changing topics back to racing:

Last year the race was lost because on hard tires, after the SC and VSC, LEC was simply unable to get the tires back to temperature as fast as RBR, even in quali Ferrari needed 2 warmup laps in both Jeddah and Australia. Aero efficiency is obviously critical.

This is last year's quali, PER v LEC:
https://i.imgur.com/X1yK2ce.jpeg

There are 2 slow corners where it's easy to see that mechanical grip matters most, every other corner is like T5-6-7 in Bahrain, fast corners where downforce matters.

On paper Ferrari should be great here, but that really depends on the gap in the slow corners, last year PER lost almost 0.25s just in the last corner, and 0.35s up till the back straight where LEC then lost 0.5s. T1 IMHO will be the real difference maker this year, in Bahrain Ferrari was losing 0.1s in quali and 0.2s+ in the race just in T1, traction out of T1 is less important here because the follow-on straight is short but still, at the end of the lap with no tires on T27 the car will be slow for sure so they really need to manage T1 well.

Also IMHO, the new rear wing only would make sense if it provides efficiency, losing top speed or better load to the rear isn't desirable judging by T5-6-7 in Bahrain.

All of this my opinion, probably wrong in more ways than one.
I wouldn't use T5-T6-T7 as a good example. That is where Red Bull was really destroying everyone in Bahrain. The RB drivers were using hardly any curb there on their qualifying laps. Sainz was constantly all over the exit curb on T7 nearly losing control.
A lion must kill its prey.

avantman
avantman
10
Joined: 07 Dec 2020, 19:17

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

I don't think Red bulls were any faster than Charles Ferrari in quali through T5-6-7.Of course they weren't using kerbs, why would they want to go slower? Kerbs would destabilize their platform. Or do you assume they were simply sandbagging in Q3?
add: yeah, I just checked the telemetry from Q3 in Bahrain(provided by dialtone), Charles gained lap time on Max through T5-6-7. Not much, but he was faster on his 1st and only run, compared to Max 1st run.

Image
(c)dialtone
Last edited by avantman on 15 Mar 2023, 15:29, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

I don't think they sandbagged in Q3, but we did hear RB heavily compromised qualifying for better race performance. Other teams did say something similar, but obviously RB went very extreme on this front.

Andi76
Andi76
431
Joined: 03 Feb 2021, 20:19

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

LM10 wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 00:12
Tweets from "tami." translating parts of Vasseur's interview with AUTOhebdo.

#AUTOhebdo has contacted Vasseur about reports from Italian media claiming he has little power in the team & Vigna making the decisions.

Vasseur (surprised): "I have the means & the power of decision that I have never had elsewhere. This is the reality of the situation!"
Vasseur about David Sanchez leaving:

Vasseur: "It's inevitable. There are people who were very close to Mattia and who prefer to leave; which doesn't bother me. And there are others who may have feared for a moment for their future."
Vasseur: "I find it difficult to understand why the team becomes a target after only one race. As far as the correlation between the simulation and the track is concerned, we are in line."
Vasseur: "That's why I asked everyone to stay focused on performance and find solutions to reliability issues, because the championship is long. Just because you don't win the first one doesn't mean you're offside. Bahrain was bad in some ways, and good in others!"
Vasseur on the reports about Charles requesting a meeting with John Elkann to discuss the situation.

Vasseur: "We spoke with the drivers, Elkann and Vigna after winter testing, and we will all speak again together after Imola. These meetings are planned.."

I hope this will calm down some of the people here.

As a side note, Diego Tonde seems to be taking over the role of Head of Vehicle Concept. What's more, Mekies and Gualtieri are not leaving, btw.

What I like about Vasseur is that he seems to be quite open about such topics. He's level-headed until now.
How do you know that Gualtieri and Mekies won't leave? The real problem with such stories at Ferrari is that such interviews are only there to appease fans and media and that usually when such things happen at Ferrari, something is very wrong. In Ferrari's case it has always been not only that where there is smoke there is fire, but that where there is smoke there is real fire. I personally know that some engineers were very unhappy about what was done with Binotto and, to put it mildly, were "finally fed up this time, because it never works, it's always the same". How much I would wish that at Ferrari everything is fine and you get the title and there are no negative effects. Only unfortunately I know Ferrari to this much too well that I know that if four important persons leave the team in short time and above all two whose life the team was - then Mr. Vasseur, which has naturally an agenda if it gives such an interview much tell - but then lies with Ferrari some in the argen and then it is internally so badly as for a long time no more. If contract details are then divulged, especially with Ferrari's extremely strict contract addendums regarding secrecy - then that speaks volumes. This has nothing to do with pessimism, but is unfortunately pure realism. What else can Vasseur say? What happened, however, says it all if you know Ferrari.

User avatar
organic
1055
Joined: 08 Jan 2022, 02:24
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Vasseur: “Leclerc will be penalized in Jeddah. Mekies will stay with us, he is a pillar of the team.”
https://www.formu1a.uno/vasseur-leclerc ... a-squadra/



Rip

User avatar
F1NAC
170
Joined: 31 Mar 2013, 22:35

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Will see if they improved defects in strategy dept. Good test

LM10
LM10
121
Joined: 07 Mar 2018, 00:07

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Andi76 wrote:
15 Mar 2023, 15:17
How do you know that Gualtieri and Mekies won't leave?
Regarding Mekies at least, AMuS reported it and as we know they're pretty well informed most of the time.

#AMuS also reports that the Laurent Mekies news (that he considers leaving) is old news. After Binotto left, Mekies looked at potential other places but that happened in December.

Back then Vasseur talked to him and convinced him to stay (made him his right hand).
#AMuS
@andihaupt1 reports that there was a leak about Enrico Cardile's contract. The leak said that his contract was running out.

Those leaks are deliberately spread, so that people think that there is a hire/fire culture at Ferrari now.
But that is not the case!
Tweets from "tami.".

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
365
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

LM10 wrote:
15 Mar 2023, 16:17
Andi76 wrote:
15 Mar 2023, 15:17
How do you know that Gualtieri and Mekies won't leave?
Regarding Mekies at least, AMuS reported it and as we know they're pretty well informed most of the time.

#AMuS also reports that the Laurent Mekies news (that he considers leaving) is old news. After Binotto left, Mekies looked at potential other places but that happened in December.

Back then Vasseur talked to him and convinced him to stay (made him his right hand).
#AMuS
@andihaupt1 reports that there was a leak about Enrico Cardile's contract. The leak said that his contract was running out.

Those leaks are deliberately spread, so that people think that there is a hire/fire culture at Ferrari now.
But that is not the case!
Tweets from "tami.".
I wondered a few things in this time

1) Could "leaks" be spread by other teams in attempt to "destabilize"?
2) Could Vasseur have been behind some of the misinformation, in hopes to identify the moles within Ferrari? Those who shared the misinformation could have been fooled and have now outed themselves to Fred (if this scenario took place).
A lion must kill its prey.

dialtone
dialtone
121
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2023 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
dialtone wrote:
15 Mar 2023, 07:29
Changing topics back to racing:

Last year the race was lost because on hard tires, after the SC and VSC, LEC was simply unable to get the tires back to temperature as fast as RBR, even in quali Ferrari needed 2 warmup laps in both Jeddah and Australia. Aero efficiency is obviously critical.

This is last year's quali, PER v LEC:
https://i.imgur.com/X1yK2ce.jpeg

There are 2 slow corners where it's easy to see that mechanical grip matters most, every other corner is like T5-6-7 in Bahrain, fast corners where downforce matters.

On paper Ferrari should be great here, but that really depends on the gap in the slow corners, last year PER lost almost 0.25s just in the last corner, and 0.35s up till the back straight where LEC then lost 0.5s. T1 IMHO will be the real difference maker this year, in Bahrain Ferrari was losing 0.1s in quali and 0.2s+ in the race just in T1, traction out of T1 is less important here because the follow-on straight is short but still, at the end of the lap with no tires on T27 the car will be slow for sure so they really need to manage T1 well.

Also IMHO, the new rear wing only would make sense if it provides efficiency, losing top speed or better load to the rear isn't desirable judging by T5-6-7 in Bahrain.

All of this my opinion, probably wrong in more ways than one.
I wouldn't use T5-T6-T7 as a good example. That is where Red Bull was really destroying everyone in Bahrain. The RB drivers were using hardly any curb there on their qualifying laps. Sainz was constantly all over the exit curb on T7 nearly losing control.
Nah, RBR was gaining at T1, T8, T10 and T15, not 5,6,7. Even with Charles lap 11 being 0.8s slower than VER he was equally fast in 5,6,7. SF-23 has good aero, bad balance especially at slow speed.