trinidefender wrote: ↑04 Apr 2023, 16:10Whatever you think of Zak I think he is doing his job quite well. Yes, technically, he is at the head of the hierarchy tree. But it's a tree that extends to ALL of McLaren racing, not just F1. In that capacity I would say he's doing quite well considering how Indy and McLaren's other racing programs are going.bauc wrote: ↑03 Apr 2023, 16:38Facts - Car is slow & Ron Deniss is never coming back to Mclaren F1.
What if's? (Lando can leave or he can stay, I don't see why this should not be discussed here) &
Zak should be sacked or he should remain as CEO (He should leave If he fails to perform, I don't see why there would not be accountability for his position compared to any other position on the team and vice versa.
So yeah, 4 weeks is a long time
Secondly and probably more pertinent when it comes to F1 is the fact that he regularly admits that he is in almost no way involved in car design or development. He is a sponsor/money man. On that front can anyone really argue that he hasn't done a good job? He's almost completely turned McLaren racings finances around, during COVID no less when things were VERY precarious, and got the funding in place for major infrastructure projects which can only be a good thing. All a far cry from the end of the Ron Dennis Boullier era. For those with a short memory when Jost Capito was briefly at McLaren some years ago he put in major recommendations for infrastructure upgrades that were mostly refused. Some sources credit this as one of the reasons that the relationship broke down which resulted in him leaving early. For comparison sake, Zak Brown got the ball rolling and ensured that these projects go the green light.
If I see Zak go I'll be very sad.
As for Andrea, only time will tell.
Spot On...Ground Effect wrote: ↑04 Apr 2023, 17:31If we're honest, we'd score him very high for the job he's done so far. I remember when a new sponsor was revealed, this place was like a party atmosphere. From Ron's black empty car, to one sponsored by BAT, google, Cisco, Coca Cola etc. Also people can change history, as is common these days, but who honestly wasn't excited when we signed Ricciardo, even James Key. Dennis fell out with long time sponsors, who he should have kept and are still on the grid, like Mobil and Tag Heuer. A lot of people don't know this, but Dennis tried and failed to get a new wind tunnel, he didn't get approval from the local council. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was due to it being an outrageous building plan, instead of something practical. Zak hasn't run from the things that didn't work out, like Renault, Key, Ricciardo etc. He took action, instead of being to proud to look like he got it wrong. It was also genius to let Seidl go immediately when the chance came. Personally, I'd score him very high marks as someone at the top in a non technical capacity. Every decision he took made perfect sense at the time, those that didn't work out, got axed or replaced.bauc wrote: ↑04 Apr 2023, 16:20I'm not saying Zak is doing a bad job, in contrary I also think he is still doing ok, not great but OK.trinidefender wrote: ↑04 Apr 2023, 16:10
Whatever you think of Zak I think he is doing his job quite well. Yes, technically, he is at the head of the hierarchy tree. But it's a tree that extends to ALL of McLaren racing, not just F1. In that capacity I would say he's doing quite well considering how Indy and McLaren's other racing programs are going.
Secondly and probably more pertinent when it comes to F1 is the fact that he regularly admits that he is in almost no way involved in car design or development. He is a sponsor/money man. On that front can anyone really argue that he hasn't done a good job? He's almost completely turned McLaren racings finances around, during COVID no less when things were VERY precarious, and got the funding in place for major infrastructure projects which can only be a good thing. All a far cry from the end of the Ron Dennis Boullier era. For those with a short memory when Jost Capito was briefly at McLaren some years ago he put in major recommendations for infrastructure upgrades that were mostly refused. Some sources credit this as one of the reasons that the relationship broke down which resulted in him leaving early. For comparison sake, Zak Brown got the ball rolling and ensured that these projects go the green light.
If I see Zak go I'll be very sad.
As for Andrea, only time will tell.
However, few people here think that we should not even discuss/critic his performance like is not a key part of the puzzle. Everyone in the team is an employee, and as such they are open to performance evaluation, I don't see a reason why Zak, regardless of his position in the team should be excluded from citric of fans/investors/board of directors or whoever else wanting his replacement, if they think he is not doing a good job.
People need to learn to give constructive critic but also accept one!
No denying it has the drag of a brick but it has been quicker than last year at every gp I think McLarens top speed woes comes from running barn door rear wings to compensate for lack of downforce I noticed during the race when Perez was chasing down lando how good the car was in the first and final sectors in sector 1 lando was equal equal with checko sector 2 lost some 3-5 tenths and then gained the same 3-5 tenths back in the final sectorSlahinki wrote: ↑05 Apr 2023, 09:57https://i.redd.it/re11mgzh0wra1.png
Not bad improvement for a car that's supposedly a "brick" and "slower than last year".
As Lando noted in the video on twitter from a few pages back the DRS doesn't seem to do too much. But considering the overall state of the car and not having seen any development since September/November or so last year, I think it's pretty good. Makes me very hopeful of the Baku update and getting the new concept on the car over the course of the year.haza wrote: ↑05 Apr 2023, 10:11No denying it has the drag of a brick but it has been quicker than last year at every gp I think McLarens top speed woes comes from running barn door rear wings to compensate for lack of downforce I noticed during the race when Perez was chasing down lando how good the car was in the first and final sectors in sector 1 lando was equal equal with checko sector 2 lost some 3-5 tenths and then gained the same 3-5 tenths back in the final sectorSlahinki wrote: ↑05 Apr 2023, 09:57https://i.redd.it/re11mgzh0wra1.png
Not bad improvement for a car that's supposedly a "brick" and "slower than last year".
Yeah only thing that really changed was it now has a larger undercut other than that an a few details on the floor it’s more or less the mcl36 with a different badge I wouldn’t get too exited about Baku upgrade it’s only the first iteration of this development path it will most likely just be a the first of many upgrades to get it up to speed so can’t expect the car to be 1 second quicker out the box it will be a steady build up over a few races to dial everything inSlahinki wrote: ↑05 Apr 2023, 10:19As Lando noted in the video on twitter from a few pages back the DRS doesn't seem to do too much. But considering the overall state of the car and not having seen any development since September/November or so last year, I think it's pretty good. Makes me very hopeful of the Baku update and getting the new concept on the car over the course of the year.haza wrote: ↑05 Apr 2023, 10:11No denying it has the drag of a brick but it has been quicker than last year at every gp I think McLarens top speed woes comes from running barn door rear wings to compensate for lack of downforce I noticed during the race when Perez was chasing down lando how good the car was in the first and final sectors in sector 1 lando was equal equal with checko sector 2 lost some 3-5 tenths and then gained the same 3-5 tenths back in the final sectorSlahinki wrote: ↑05 Apr 2023, 09:57https://i.redd.it/re11mgzh0wra1.png
Not bad improvement for a car that's supposedly a "brick" and "slower than last year".
I agree with you on the success he had.Ground Effect wrote: ↑04 Apr 2023, 17:31If we're honest, we'd score him very high for the job he's done so far. I remember when a new sponsor was revealed, this place was like a party atmosphere. From Ron's black empty car, to one sponsored by BAT, google, Cisco, Coca Cola etc. Also people can change history, as is common these days, but who honestly wasn't excited when we signed Ricciardo, even James Key. Dennis fell out with long time sponsors, who he should have kept and are still on the grid, like Mobil and Tag Heuer. A lot of people don't know this, but Dennis tried and failed to get a new wind tunnel, he didn't get approval from the local council. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was due to it being an outrageous building plan, instead of something practical. Zak hasn't run from the things that didn't work out, like Renault, Key, Ricciardo etc. He took action, instead of being to proud to look like he got it wrong. It was also genius to let Seidl go immediately when the chance came. Personally, I'd score him very high marks as someone at the top in a non technical capacity. Every decision he took made perfect sense at the time, those that didn't work out, got axed or replaced.bauc wrote: ↑04 Apr 2023, 16:20I'm not saying Zak is doing a bad job, in contrary I also think he is still doing ok, not great but OK.trinidefender wrote: ↑04 Apr 2023, 16:10
Whatever you think of Zak I think he is doing his job quite well. Yes, technically, he is at the head of the hierarchy tree. But it's a tree that extends to ALL of McLaren racing, not just F1. In that capacity I would say he's doing quite well considering how Indy and McLaren's other racing programs are going.
Secondly and probably more pertinent when it comes to F1 is the fact that he regularly admits that he is in almost no way involved in car design or development. He is a sponsor/money man. On that front can anyone really argue that he hasn't done a good job? He's almost completely turned McLaren racings finances around, during COVID no less when things were VERY precarious, and got the funding in place for major infrastructure projects which can only be a good thing. All a far cry from the end of the Ron Dennis Boullier era. For those with a short memory when Jost Capito was briefly at McLaren some years ago he put in major recommendations for infrastructure upgrades that were mostly refused. Some sources credit this as one of the reasons that the relationship broke down which resulted in him leaving early. For comparison sake, Zak Brown got the ball rolling and ensured that these projects go the green light.
If I see Zak go I'll be very sad.
As for Andrea, only time will tell.
However, few people here think that we should not even discuss/critic his performance like is not a key part of the puzzle. Everyone in the team is an employee, and as such they are open to performance evaluation, I don't see a reason why Zak, regardless of his position in the team should be excluded from citric of fans/investors/board of directors or whoever else wanting his replacement, if they think he is not doing a good job.
People need to learn to give constructive critic but also accept one!
Yeah, I'm more excited about the path that starts with the Baku update than necessarily the update itself. That said, I do hope we at least get signs of potential at Baku.haza wrote: ↑05 Apr 2023, 10:32Yeah only thing that really changed was it now has a larger undercut other than that an a few details on the floor it’s more or less the mcl36 with a different badge I wouldn’t get too exited about Baku upgrade it’s only the first iteration of this development path it will most likely just be a the first of many upgrades to get it up to speed so can’t expect the car to be 1 second quicker out the box it will be a steady build up over a few races to dial everything inSlahinki wrote: ↑05 Apr 2023, 10:19As Lando noted in the video on twitter from a few pages back the DRS doesn't seem to do too much. But considering the overall state of the car and not having seen any development since September/November or so last year, I think it's pretty good. Makes me very hopeful of the Baku update and getting the new concept on the car over the course of the year.haza wrote: ↑05 Apr 2023, 10:11
No denying it has the drag of a brick but it has been quicker than last year at every gp I think McLarens top speed woes comes from running barn door rear wings to compensate for lack of downforce I noticed during the race when Perez was chasing down lando how good the car was in the first and final sectors in sector 1 lando was equal equal with checko sector 2 lost some 3-5 tenths and then gained the same 3-5 tenths back in the final sector
Correction.bauc wrote: ↑05 Apr 2023, 10:33I agree with you on the success he had.Ground Effect wrote: ↑04 Apr 2023, 17:31If we're honest, we'd score him very high for the job he's done so far. I remember when a new sponsor was revealed, this place was like a party atmosphere. From Ron's black empty car, to one sponsored by BAT, google, Cisco, Coca Cola etc. Also people can change history, as is common these days, but who honestly wasn't excited when we signed Ricciardo, even James Key. Dennis fell out with long time sponsors, who he should have kept and are still on the grid, like Mobil and Tag Heuer. A lot of people don't know this, but Dennis tried and failed to get a new wind tunnel, he didn't get approval from the local council. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was due to it being an outrageous building plan, instead of something practical. Zak hasn't run from the things that didn't work out, like Renault, Key, Ricciardo etc. He took action, instead of being to proud to look like he got it wrong. It was also genius to let Seidl go immediately when the chance came. Personally, I'd score him very high marks as someone at the top in a non technical capacity. Every decision he took made perfect sense at the time, those that didn't work out, got axed or replaced.bauc wrote: ↑04 Apr 2023, 16:20
I'm not saying Zak is doing a bad job, in contrary I also think he is still doing ok, not great but OK.
However, few people here think that we should not even discuss/critic his performance like is not a key part of the puzzle. Everyone in the team is an employee, and as such they are open to performance evaluation, I don't see a reason why Zak, regardless of his position in the team should be excluded from citric of fans/investors/board of directors or whoever else wanting his replacement, if they think he is not doing a good job.
People need to learn to give constructive critic but also accept one!
He also made one crucial mistake that people tend to forget, he lay off too many staff when battling with the financial crisis and with the anticipation of the cost cap, only to realize that they've overdone it by a mile! Once they faced the music on this, they started recruiting again to fill the gap that was wide open in the structure, especially in the aero department, a department that now is again heavily affected and underperforming, but like I said above, overall, given all the circumstances I think Zak is doing a OK job for now, I don't see a reason to change him.
Same, I guess this was early in the race, I can see PEREZ in the back.mclaren111 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2023, 16:11https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FsypU5gWwAE ... name=small
Didn't see this during the race on TV...
This was the reason why Oscar fell back for a while, it was shown but briefly.mclaren111 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2023, 16:11https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FsypU5gWwAE ... name=small
Didn't see this during the race on TV...
Was it a mistake? We do not know who else was available at the time, it may have been Hobsons Choice.mclaren111 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2023, 09:48trinidefender wrote: ↑04 Apr 2023, 16:10Whatever you think of Zak I think he is doing his job quite well. Yes, technically, he is at the head of the hierarchy tree. But it's a tree that extends to ALL of McLaren racing, not just F1. In that capacity I would say he's doing quite well considering how Indy and McLaren's other racing programs are going.bauc wrote: ↑03 Apr 2023, 16:38
Facts - Car is slow & Ron Deniss is never coming back to Mclaren F1.
What if's? (Lando can leave or he can stay, I don't see why this should not be discussed here) &
Zak should be sacked or he should remain as CEO (He should leave If he fails to perform, I don't see why there would not be accountability for his position compared to any other position on the team and vice versa.
So yeah, 4 weeks is a long time
Secondly and probably more pertinent when it comes to F1 is the fact that he regularly admits that he is in almost no way involved in car design or development. He is a sponsor/money man. On that front can anyone really argue that he hasn't done a good job? He's almost completely turned McLaren racings finances around, during COVID no less when things were VERY precarious, and got the funding in place for major infrastructure projects which can only be a good thing. All a far cry from the end of the Ron Dennis Boullier era. For those with a short memory when Jost Capito was briefly at McLaren some years ago he put in major recommendations for infrastructure upgrades that were mostly refused. Some sources credit this as one of the reasons that the relationship broke down which resulted in him leaving early. For comparison sake, Zak Brown got the ball rolling and ensured that these projects go the green light.
If I see Zak go I'll be very sad.
As for Andrea, only time will tell.
Totally agree... Zak has done a great job... Hindsight being 20/20, signing Key might be his only mistake...