Sounds like the type of language a marketing department would use to avoid having to say that an unfortunate engineer dropped a washer in a place it didn’t belong.
My first thoughts were valve (or part of) or plug electrode
Next to impossible without complete carnage.
Why? The information is proprietary. These are trade secrets.
The design and technology is certainly proprietary, but the reason(s) for the failures probably aren't as evidenced by the previous list; the proprietary information is the solution to the problem. My point is that it would be interesting for technical fans if the teams had to describe the failure. The FIA allows modifications to power train components to fix reliability issues, so why shouldn't the teams be required to explain what these issues are to all of us? For an engine manufacturer to get approval to modify an engine for reliability they have to submit their proposed 'fix' to all other engine manufacturers for comment and approval so 'proprietary' is weak sauce.
At least to me it seems close to what happened to FERRARI last year, meaning, and this was never official from FERRARI, which was said to be ''A spark-plug melt down". A spark-plugs nowadays includes the passive pre-chamber build into it.