Obviously FOTA are determined to separate FOM from most of the revenues the company needs to serve their current overburdening debts. And they seem to be in a position to do that one way or another. The consequence can only be failure of FOM and going into receivership. Ideally a FOTA series would want to claim the F1 heritage which they have a pritty good chance to, if they eliminate CVC. The brand value is just too good to drop the name. In order to use F1 FOTA would have to deal with the brand owner as well. The FIA has a veto regarding the sale of F1 commercial rights. So it would be logical if they try to get a sympathetic person into control of the FIA. This whole campaign lately reminds me a lot of the FIA/FOCA war. 2003 and 2005 were different because there never was a nucleus of capabilities and strengthes. This time around the teams have a very rich person who wants them to do their own series (Mateschitz). They have someone with ambition in commercial control (Briatore) and they have the ego in the back who knows all about the tricks of the antagonists (Montezemolo).gcdugas wrote:Why? The FIA is an irredeemable entity with politically stacked courts of appeal covering each others' asses and bone-headed stewards who don't even look at video footage or listen to radio transmissions before issuing a ruling. They are also very poor at interpreting the English language interpreting internal mass dampers as "movable aero devices". Last year's Spa decision etc. There is nothing there worth saving. Junk the whole lot of them. If they wanted to run a candidate to replace Max they would have done so the last time around as he wasn't very popular then either with all the GPMA row being contemporary just prior to that election.WhiteBlue wrote: Once FOM collapses and F1 is significantly damaged FOTA will have the necessary leverage to push their own candidate at the FIA presidential elections. It looks to me as if this has been the objective for some time.