basti313 wrote: ↑17 May 2023, 15:07
dren wrote: ↑17 May 2023, 15:02
basti313 wrote: ↑17 May 2023, 14:18
I think it is really bad. They changed from drought to flood and the flood is really bad and affecting a lot of villages without any preparation. That is a lot to clean up.
The decision is right. There is no infrastructure, no hotels, no police and fire brigades to support the event.
I hate these weekends...
Thanks. I live in an area that floods. I've been involved in a few civil projects and we design around certain xxx year flood events. I was just curious what kind of event this one was.
I think this is the differencs...it sounds as if they were not prepared at all for these masses of water.
The race wasn't cancelled because the track was flooded, it was cancelled because the region is suffering a disaster and throwing tens of thousands of extra people in to the region for a sports event at the moment would just be monumentally stupid.
The circuit itself hasn't flooded because the River Santerno hasn't burst its banks in Imola - the levies created to protect the town are working. Parts of the paddock flooded but most likely because they drain in to the river and the outfalls are probably under water.
The hills that the river rises in have had over 200mm of rainfall in 36hr.
The region expects to get c.800mm of rainfall in a year. So even looking at things like 100 year flood histories might not have been enough. A quick google hasn't brought up any information but that's because everything google brings up is to do with the race being cancelled.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.