What's strange is how many people have been defending a sidepod on these threads, like it's their pride and joy. The zeropod was an utter failure, and leaving it behind is good. Despite all the nonsense talk from the team and fans that "the sidepod isn't performance defining". Huh? 4th major change in less than 1,5 years to a non-performance defining part. This narrative is ridiculous.ValeVida46 wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 12:28
I think it's more strange that it's appeared when many "experts" on these very threads said it wasn't possible....
Merely contrasting the upgrade to statements made by the team. 100% belongs in the team thread.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 13:02What's strange is talk about the car happening in the team thread...
I'm sure it was no easy to task to move the cooling systems and other bits around to accommodate the change in shape to the sidepods but it's not an impossible thing to do. The only thing that's not possible for Mercedes to do due to the cost cap is to change the chassis design for this season.ValeVida46 wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 12:28
I think it's more strange that it's appeared when many "experts" on these very threads said it wasn't possible....
It's almost like Mercedes can't make mistakes.Cs98 wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 13:02What's strange is how many people have been defending a sidepod on these threads, like it's their pride and joy. The zeropod was an utter failure, and leaving it behind is good. Despite all the nonsense talk from the team and fans that "the sidepod isn't performance defining". Huh? 4th major change in less than 1,5 years to a non-performance defining part. This narrative is ridiculous.
These statements are not months old though. They've been saying the same thing non-stop since the start of 2022 until here and now. Some fans have been lapping it up. As is always the case in F1 though, talk is cheap. Look at what a team does, not what it says. Their actions have been screaming since the start of last season they believe the sidepod is very performance defining. You don't hide something you don't believe is important. And you certainly don't change it twice in the span of less than half a year if it's not defining.ValeVida46 wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 13:12It's almost like Mercedes can't make mistakes.Cs98 wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 13:02What's strange is how many people have been defending a sidepod on these threads, like it's their pride and joy. The zeropod was an utter failure, and leaving it behind is good. Despite all the nonsense talk from the team and fans that "the sidepod isn't performance defining". Huh? 4th major change in less than 1,5 years to a non-performance defining part. This narrative is ridiculous.
Or if they find a problem, and correct it, they must be beholden to statements made months before
Absolutely. I don't think anyone suggested a new chassis. But there were a few that did say that because of the pod wing, it would be impossible to have a more traditional sidepod.taperoo2k wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 13:07I'm sure it was no easy to task to move the cooling systems and other bits around to accommodate the change in shape to the sidepods but it's not an impossible thing to do. The only thing that's not possible for Mercedes to do due to the cost cap is to change the chassis design for this season.ValeVida46 wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 12:28
I think it's more strange that it's appeared when many "experts" on these very threads said it wasn't possible....
It's all about the rules for radius allowances on the sidepods. The midwing stops them being able to come back in again because the bottom of the wing already does. Looks like they have incorporated it into the top of the inlet, which stops this being an issue.ValeVida46 wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 12:28
I think it's more strange that it's appeared when many "experts" on these very threads said it wasn't possible....
Cs98 wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 13:15These statements are not months old though. They've been saying the same thing non-stop since the start of 2022 until here and now. Some fans have been lapping it up. As is always the case in F1 though, talk is cheap. Look at what a team does, not what it says. Their actions have been screaming since the start of last season they believe the sidepod is very performance defining. You don't hide something you don't believe is important. And you certainly don't change it twice in the span of less than half a year if it's not defining.ValeVida46 wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 13:12It's almost like Mercedes can't make mistakes.Cs98 wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 13:02What's strange is how many people have been defending a sidepod on these threads, like it's their pride and joy. The zeropod was an utter failure, and leaving it behind is good. Despite all the nonsense talk from the team and fans that "the sidepod isn't performance defining". Huh? 4th major change in less than 1,5 years to a non-performance defining part. This narrative is ridiculous.
Or if they find a problem, and correct it, they must be beholden to statements made months before
Which is a very simple solution, and one that was proposed on the W14 thread(from memory)...either there or twitter.SiLo wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 13:19It's all about the rules for radius allowances on the sidepods. The midwing stops them being able to come back in again because the bottom of the wing already does. Looks like they have incorporated it into the top of the inlet, which stops this being an issue.ValeVida46 wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 12:28
I think it's more strange that it's appeared when many "experts" on these very threads said it wasn't possible....
No, I want to highlight how meaningless those words were, and point out how silly it was to blindly believe it as so many in these threads did. The "it's not even the problem" sentiment was pervasive, because people listened to words instead of analysing what was happening with the car.ValeVida46 wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 13:21Cs98 wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 13:15These statements are not months old though. They've been saying the same thing non-stop since the start of 2022 until here and now. Some fans have been lapping it up. As is always the case in F1 though, talk is cheap. Look at what a team does, not what it says. Their actions have been screaming since the start of last season they believe the sidepod is very performance defining. You don't hide something you don't believe is important. And you certainly don't change it twice in the span of less than half a year if it's not defining.ValeVida46 wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 13:12
It's almost like Mercedes can't make mistakes.
Or if they find a problem, and correct it, they must be beholden to statements made months before
So you say in F1 talk is cheap and actions are louder than words...yet you want to prioritise what they're saying instead of what they're doing?
Surely instead of kicking them, you can say that they're at least trying to figure out a way to get faster?
Cs98 wrote: ↑24 May 2023, 13:27No, I want to highlight how meaningless those words were, and point out how silly it was to blindly believe it as so many in these threads did. The "it's not even the problem" sentiment was pervasive, because people listened to words instead of analysing what was happening with the car.
Just two weeks ago posted here: