Aston Martin AMR23

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
Zynerji
110
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 16:14

Re: Aston Martin AMR23

Post

carisi2k wrote:
26 May 2023, 08:18
organic wrote:
25 May 2023, 18:33
https://i.imgur.com/8FmwMXb.jpeg

There is some tricky geometry/discontinuity going on with their flap's joint with the rest of the wing. Hard to say exactly what they're doing
This is the sort of thing that needs to be banned because it goes against the purpose of the new regs and creates the dirty air the new regs were meant to remove.
This is the sort of thing that keeps several of us interested in F1 at all, however.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
365
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Aston Martin AMR23

Post

organic wrote:
25 May 2023, 18:33
https://i.imgur.com/8FmwMXb.jpeg

There is some tricky geometry/discontinuity going on with their flap's joint with the rest of the wing. Hard to say exactly what they're doing
That lateral flow is likely the purpose of this detail.
A lion must kill its prey.

User avatar
Zynerji
110
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 16:14

Re: Aston Martin AMR23

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
26 May 2023, 15:14
Excellent visualisation of strong lateral flow at flap tips.
Is it even reaching the backside of the upper flap? Or is there just a protective laminar flow from the slot-gap that pushes the flowvis into the rooster tail without touching?🤔

User avatar
Vanja #66
1569
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: Aston Martin AMR23

Post

Zynerji wrote:
26 May 2023, 15:27
Is it even reaching the backside of the upper flap? Or is there just a protective laminar flow from the slot-gap that pushes the flowvis into the rooster tail without touching?🤔
The very top of the flap tips is basically stalled, but in this case it most likely means the wing is working at the very maximum of its potential. E.g. they could cut it out to reduce drag, but this would likely hurt the tip vortices and reduce downforce.
And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

User avatar
Zynerji
110
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 16:14

Re: Aston Martin AMR23

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
26 May 2023, 16:23
Zynerji wrote:
26 May 2023, 15:27
Is it even reaching the backside of the upper flap? Or is there just a protective laminar flow from the slot-gap that pushes the flowvis into the rooster tail without touching?🤔
The very top of the flap tips is basically stalled, but in this case it most likely means the wing is working at the very maximum of its potential. E.g. they could cut it out to reduce drag, but this would likely hurt the tip vortices and reduce downforce.
Could the stalling effect work like the F-duct?!?! :o

User avatar
Vanja #66
1569
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: Aston Martin AMR23

Post

Zynerji wrote:
26 May 2023, 16:47
Could the stalling effect work like the F-duct?!?! :o
With flap down, not really, it's likely a permanent separation bubble. With flap up, it could essentially stall the whole flap tip and reduce drag vs flap down flow. However, I expect this is the same for any wing design now that we have this transition bend between wing and endplate.
And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

User avatar
Zynerji
110
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 16:14

Re: Aston Martin AMR23

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
26 May 2023, 16:54
Zynerji wrote:
26 May 2023, 16:47
Could the stalling effect work like the F-duct?!?! :o
With flap down, not really, it's likely a permanent separation bubble. With flap up, it could essentially stall the whole flap tip and reduce drag vs flap down flow. However, I expect this is the same for any wing design now that we have this transition bend between wing and endplate.
Thanks

User avatar
diffuser
236
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: Aston Martin AMR23

Post

March
Image

April 29th
Image

May 26th
Image

Image

Image

User avatar
BassVirolla
12
Joined: 20 Jul 2018, 23:55

Re: Aston Martin AMR23

Post

Tweet without any technical value, but nice view of the slides.


Venturiation
Venturiation
98
Joined: 04 Jan 2023, 19:48

Re: Aston Martin AMR23

Post

Top floor
Image

KimiRai
KimiRai
257
Joined: 10 Aug 2022, 20:08

Re: Aston Martin AMR23

Post

No view from below yet?

Venturiation
Venturiation
98
Joined: 04 Jan 2023, 19:48

Re: Aston Martin AMR23

Post

KimiRai wrote:
27 May 2023, 23:18
No view from below yet?
Last chance is tomorrow if something happens on the track

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
559
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Aston Martin AMR23

Post

BassVirolla wrote:
27 May 2023, 14:32
Tweet without any technical value, but nice view of the slides.

https://twitter.com/alomgc14/status/1662425677369409540
This formula's optimum shape is make side pods as wide as possible, with deep undercut and a gully?
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

User avatar
carisi2k
28
Joined: 15 Oct 2014, 23:26

Re: Aston Martin AMR23

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
26 May 2023, 15:23
organic wrote:
25 May 2023, 18:33
https://i.imgur.com/8FmwMXb.jpeg

There is some tricky geometry/discontinuity going on with their flap's joint with the rest of the wing. Hard to say exactly what they're doing
That lateral flow is likely the purpose of this detail.
Except it is coming at the expense of what these new rules were made to achieve. The goal was to get rid of dirty air and these things create the dirty air and so they should be eliminated so as to achieve the goal of reduced dirty air.

User avatar
diffuser
236
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: Aston Martin AMR23

Post

carisi2k wrote:
29 May 2023, 04:00
AR3-GP wrote:
26 May 2023, 15:23
organic wrote:
25 May 2023, 18:33
https://i.imgur.com/8FmwMXb.jpeg

There is some tricky geometry/discontinuity going on with their flap's joint with the rest of the wing. Hard to say exactly what they're doing
That lateral flow is likely the purpose of this detail.
Except it is coming at the expense of what these new rules were made to achieve. The goal was to get rid of dirty air and these things create the dirty air and so they should be eliminated so as to achieve the goal of reduced dirty air.
Not sure about that. From the pic posted from Citrix... looks like they're trying keep the air flow from the point of the upper rear wing?

Image