Of course. Unless it's a role that is allowed to be outside of the cost cap. No idea whether driver development is part of the cost cap. I would guess it isn't otherwise all of the teams that have driver development programmes would have dropped them.
Reading the article it looks like his role will possibly be expanded into something bigger over time.
Nothing to say, really. Unrepresentative session which tells us little about the real relative pace of the cars at this circuit.
I feel really it's hard to read from running so far. That's for the teams and us in observation, with everyone probably keeping their cards/hand a little covered while getting on with their own information acquisition.
Definitely is. The car looked well balanced too.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑17 Jun 2023, 18:10The car looks sorta quick in qualifying trim? But Canada is about preserving the rear tyres and the brakes.
Both cars made it to Q3 in similar conditions last year.Hammerfist wrote: ↑17 Jun 2023, 20:29The car just doesn’t work in the wet. Cant get the tires in the window at all. Id say a q3 appearance is unlikely.
Are they still running medium downforce?
And they have again.zibby43 wrote: ↑17 Jun 2023, 20:32Both cars made it to Q3 in similar conditions last year.Hammerfist wrote: ↑17 Jun 2023, 20:29The car just doesn’t work in the wet. Cant get the tires in the window at all. Id say a q3 appearance is unlikely.
Are they still running medium downforce?