"So far this year where they've had trouble with the kerbs/bumps they've looked less superior (Canada, Australia) than at smoother tracks where they can run lower". Sounds exactly like 2022.organic wrote: ↑06 Jul 2023, 19:23Last year RB didn't gain much when they were able to run lower. Their advantage was running softly sprung and their car still producing a lot of df across a wide range of ride heights. The same is true with the rb19 but a big part of df is sacrificed when they have to back off the ride height. So far this year where they've had trouble with the kerbs/bumps they've looked less superior (Canada, Australia) than at smoother tracks where they can run lower.Cs98 wrote: ↑06 Jul 2023, 19:14Spa bud, Spa will be F1 porn if you're a RB fan.organic wrote: ↑05 Jul 2023, 12:32https://tvthek.orf.at/profile/Formel-1- ... otor&pos=1
As stated previously at Austria Marko confirmed no upgrades for Silverstone on Austria channel ORF in an interview.
Marko: no upgrades planned for silverstone
The tone was a bit like "we don't need them so why would we?", which isn't far from the truth; Silverstone should suit the car very, very well. I think Silverstone may be where the car performs best
Spa is the ultimate test as it has the maximum vertical compression of the suspension across the calendar at eau rouge.. I think with this year's car they won't have such a large edge at spa with them being forced to compromise a little on ride height and suspension, unlike last year.
Idk just my thoughts
Spa is about efficiency and ride, both of which are improved from last year. I think Spa is the ultimate track for RB.