Ferrari mistake was the 1st pit in both drivers. They could had stay for many more laps and eventually they could had put Softs. This is the No1 error and again a strategic mistake.Andres125sx wrote: ↑11 Jul 2023, 12:46Curious how you´ve conveniently ignored Ferrari big mistake of switching to hards on lap 27/52, instead of switching to softs wich would have lasted perfectly the rest of the race, at a much faster pace, ruining Sainz chances. But you didn´t even mention thisVanja #66 wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023, 16:54IndeedSevach wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023, 14:06Ferrari's inability to call an audible is what really hurts them, too painful to see.
They also totally disregard driver's feel, Leclerc calling for softs and getting hards in Barcelona comes to mind.
This over dependence on (often flawed) data, is why they so often look stupid.
Let's not overly dramatise, loose rear end in slow speed corners is common at the start of the race.
What a load of nonsense, he had two laps that showed drop off and they pulled him in. Leclerc was faster than him in any case, even if only slightly, so the gap would have only gotten bigger. He got better track position than Leclerc after SC and should have had 6 points yesterday, not 1. He needs to stop making mistakes during races, he needs to stop making excuses and delusional what-ifs in his head, he's got only himself to blame for 10th place yesterday. With his luck, Leclerc would have won the title last year.Andres125sx wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023, 13:41Sincerely, the only reason to pit Sainz on lap 27/52 for a switch from medium to hards, apart from utter incompetence, is they noticed they messed it up with Leclerc, and repeated same mistake with Sainz, consciously, to avoid Sainz beating Leclerc.
Also curious how you´ve also ignored Sainz was on used hards while the rest where on new mediums or even softs when he made a mistake and got past by 3 cars with much faster and fresher tires (Perez and Albon with new softs, Leclerc with new mediums, Sainz using old hards). But you didn´t even mention this either
.
.
.
.
OTOH, constantly bashing with no reason a Ferrari driver in the Ferrari Thread could be considered trolling, we Ferrari fans do not deserve this constant bashing, nosense and unfairness with one of the red drivers
Indeed. But if it was a big mistake with Leclerc, repeating same mistake with Sainz several laps later, after watching Leclerc tires wich were almost perfect (Ferrari words), and after watching Russell stint with softs, for more than half the race, with full tanks, and on dirty air constantly... that´s an even bigger mistake wich I don´t think any F1 team will do, so I can only think they did it on purpose to avoid Sainz beating Leclerc with a much faster tire
Please don't speak for "us".Andres125sx wrote: ↑11 Jul 2023, 12:46OTOH, constantly bashing with no reason a Ferrari driver in the Ferrari Thread could be considered trolling, we Ferrari fans do not deserve this constant bashing, nosense and unfairness with one of the red drivers
Why do you underestimate Carlos? If Leclerc could hold a Mercedes on Softs without DRS, why couldn't Sainz with DRS hold slower cars on Softs behind? Sainz is clearly back to his best race-pace this season, but he needs to take some time off, rethink his approach and stop making excuses for his mistakes. Only then will he be able to make the final step to always maximising his races, the way Alonso does.Andres125sx wrote: ↑11 Jul 2023, 13:49Sure, fighting with old hards vs new softs and new mediums is an excuse... OMG
Extremely fast corner circuit where we will probably be on the C1-C2-C3 range where weve generally struggled. It looks they are geniunely trying to tackle the high speed cornering deficit we have for before '24.
I still have hope for the team considering the progress made in the 2 GP before Silverstone. We all knew this track was going to be rough, but at the same time, wrong setup cost 2 tenths per lap which would have comfortably been ahead of the Mercs here. Important part is to keep pushing and understanding for next year in terms of the car. On the off track side of things... I don't even know anymore. Does the team need a whole revamp? I don't get it. They keep making the same mistakes as before. Vasseur needs to put his foot down and change something, because what we have right now is not working obviously.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑11 Jul 2023, 16:46Extremely fast corner circuit where we will probably be on the C1-C2-C3 range where weve generally struggled. It looks they are geniunely trying to tackle the high speed cornering deficit we have for before '24.
It gives me the slightest bit of hope for the future of this team
Incorrect setup is a mysterious one, this is a circuit historically theyve always got it right, either the SF-23 evo in terms of setup has changes drastically or they rely a lot on Charles' feedback.SoulPancake13 wrote: ↑11 Jul 2023, 16:55I still have hope for the team considering the progress made in the 2 GP before Silverstone. We all knew this track was going to be rough, but at the same time, wrong setup cost 2 tenths per lap which would have comfortably been ahead of the Mercs here. Important part is to keep pushing and understanding for next year in terms of the car. On the off track side of things... I don't even know anymore. Does the team need a whole revamp? I don't get it. They keep making the same mistakes as before. Vasseur needs to put his foot down and change something, because what we have right now is not working obviously.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑11 Jul 2023, 16:46Extremely fast corner circuit where we will probably be on the C1-C2-C3 range where weve generally struggled. It looks they are geniunely trying to tackle the high speed cornering deficit we have for before '24.
It gives me the slightest bit of hope for the future of this team
The one Friday run they did with Sainz was really scary because of the deg so they just became too conservative with the setup, they likely prevented the car from really firing up the tyres on a cooler Sunday due to this and the lack of pushing which they could have done. We all know though that Charles is a better tyre manager than Sainz and to be honest, the faster driver so of course they likely rely on his input more.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑11 Jul 2023, 17:07Incorrect setup is a mysterious one, this is a circuit historically theyve always got it right, either the SF-23 evo in terms of setup has changes drastically or they rely a lot on Charles' feedback.SoulPancake13 wrote: ↑11 Jul 2023, 16:55I still have hope for the team considering the progress made in the 2 GP before Silverstone. We all knew this track was going to be rough, but at the same time, wrong setup cost 2 tenths per lap which would have comfortably been ahead of the Mercs here. Important part is to keep pushing and understanding for next year in terms of the car. On the off track side of things... I don't even know anymore. Does the team need a whole revamp? I don't get it. They keep making the same mistakes as before. Vasseur needs to put his foot down and change something, because what we have right now is not working obviously.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑11 Jul 2023, 16:46
Extremely fast corner circuit where we will probably be on the C1-C2-C3 range where weve generally struggled. It looks they are geniunely trying to tackle the high speed cornering deficit we have for before '24.
It gives me the slightest bit of hope for the future of this team
Bigger question is if they can rely on any of the drivers for feedback considering both drivers claim they dont understand this car as it is very inconsistent.SoulPancake13 wrote: ↑11 Jul 2023, 19:07The one Friday run they did with Sainz was really scary because of the deg so they just became too conservative with the setup, they likely prevented the car from really firing up the tyres on a cooler Sunday due to this and the lack of pushing which they could have done. We all know though that Charles is a better tyre manager than Sainz and to be honest, the faster driver so of course they likely rely on his input more.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑11 Jul 2023, 17:07Incorrect setup is a mysterious one, this is a circuit historically theyve always got it right, either the SF-23 evo in terms of setup has changes drastically or they rely a lot on Charles' feedback.SoulPancake13 wrote: ↑11 Jul 2023, 16:55
I still have hope for the team considering the progress made in the 2 GP before Silverstone. We all knew this track was going to be rough, but at the same time, wrong setup cost 2 tenths per lap which would have comfortably been ahead of the Mercs here. Important part is to keep pushing and understanding for next year in terms of the car. On the off track side of things... I don't even know anymore. Does the team need a whole revamp? I don't get it. They keep making the same mistakes as before. Vasseur needs to put his foot down and change something, because what we have right now is not working obviously.
To be honest, I didn't see deg in Sainz' run on Softs, but the lap times were simply slow. Started with 33.5, went up to 35.1 and then back down to 33.3. Deg is usually a steady decline in lap times and then maybe one last quick lap before pitting. But of course, we don't know what else they saw in the data. I'm reading Vasseur's statement from Sunday again, it seems they decided on Friday they won't use Softs no matter what in the race, this seems like way too rigid approach.SoulPancake13 wrote: ↑11 Jul 2023, 19:07The one Friday run they did with Sainz was really scary because of the deg so they just became too conservative with the setup, they likely prevented the car from really firing up the tyres on a cooler Sunday due to this and the lack of pushing which they could have done. We all know though that Charles is a better tyre manager than Sainz and to be honest, the faster driver so of course they likely rely on his input more.