What "moral responsibility"?Willy wrote: ↑19 Jul 2023, 18:21Is Toto the next Haug if things don't improve? Accountability and moral responsibility is the key for organizational excellence. Toto is also part owner and the head of the team. Will he keep his stakes if he has to leave the team leader role?AR3-GP wrote: ↑19 Jul 2023, 17:52I never said Haug was "the Architect". I said he was "one of them". Norbert Haug's association with Mercedes motorsport operations predates Andy Cowell by a few decades... He was generally the "all things to do with Mercedes in motorsport" guy. Cowell may have directly led Brixworth, but there are levels above that enable things like this. That's why I name Haug as part of their success. He's the guy that had to fall on a knife so others could run.ValeVida46 wrote: ↑19 Jul 2023, 17:28
If Haug's name was Andy Cowell, sure.
Haug, a great guy(met twice) and seen him drift his R107....would be the first to admit he was not the architect of Mercs PU dominance. He was the guy that shielded the team and reported back under the old model. His head had to roll according to that method.
Exactly why Zetsche shifted away from that into the autonomous AMG model.
As for accountability, yes, he is accountable. Just as Horner was accountable for several years where his team couldn't compete against the dominant Mercedes (or even against Ferrari). Or is that somehow different? Was Horner's position at stake during the "Mercedes Years"? Should it have been?