Williams: there were defects with the wheel covers at Belgium causing excessive degradation that ruined performance in the racer85 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2023, 07:46That's a pretty wild take. I was thinking of an order like in Belgium: RB>FER>MERC>AM>MCL>...WIL...Sofa King wrote: ↑29 Aug 2023, 01:40Does performance at Baku still have a correlation with Monza given the long straights? If so, then Ferrari could do well. Seems Williams still has the least drag, so would expect them to do well. I see the following order RB>FER>AM>MCL>WIL>MERC and then the rest who knows
Williams weren't good in Baku and Spa despie their low drag car. Second fastest in the race will still be at random as usual with a slight edge possibly going to Ferrari.
New tires last longer though, so might be a wash and same as past years despite softer compound.organic wrote:C3-C5 tyres this weekend. Softer tyres for the Italian GP than we usually have.
As a result degradation and strategy may become more of a factor this weekend than it usually is at Monza. Pitlane losses are obviously large but with a hot day, a 1-stop may not be possible
Also the new tyre allocation this weekend: Hards must be run in Q1, mediums in Q2, softs Q3
I feel like we have that notion because there have not been any warm races. Every race since Silverstone has had a cool track I think..dialtone wrote: ↑29 Aug 2023, 21:55New tires last longer though, so might be a wash and same as past years despite softer compound.organic wrote:C3-C5 tyres this weekend. Softer tyres for the Italian GP than we usually have.
As a result degradation and strategy may become more of a factor this weekend than it usually is at Monza. Pitlane losses are obviously large but with a hot day, a 1-stop may not be possible
Also the new tyre allocation this weekend: Hards must be run in Q1, mediums in Q2, softs Q3
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You just jinxed it. Monza is going to rain as well now. Until Max loses we keep wet races.organic wrote:I feel like we have that notion because there have not been any warm races. Every race since Silverstone has had a cool track I think..dialtone wrote: ↑29 Aug 2023, 21:55New tires last longer though, so might be a wash and same as past years despite softer compound.organic wrote:C3-C5 tyres this weekend. Softer tyres for the Italian GP than we usually have.
As a result degradation and strategy may become more of a factor this weekend than it usually is at Monza. Pitlane losses are obviously large but with a hot day, a 1-stop may not be possible
Also the new tyre allocation this weekend: Hards must be run in Q1, mediums in Q2, softs Q3
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But yes the tyres seem to be lasting long time. If we get a hot race and this happens I'll believe it completely
I would not wish this on Leclercdialtone wrote: ↑29 Aug 2023, 22:04You just jinxed it. Monza is going to rain as well now. Until Max loses we keep wet races.organic wrote:I feel like we have that notion because there have not been any warm races. Every race since Silverstone has had a cool track I think..
But yes the tyres seem to be lasting long time. If we get a hot race and this happens I'll believe it completely
Merc did not have the fastest car in 2019. Charles won pole position and could use his massive top speed advantage to defend for 50 laps.AR3-GP wrote: ↑28 Aug 2023, 20:52Ironically, what seems to be about as equally common in the last 4-5 years of races at Monza is having the fastest car and not winning. That happened to Merc in '19, '20, and '21.
So the question is which version of the curse will strike this year? The one where the winner last year doesn't win this year, or the one where the fastest car doesn't win? RB certainly have many curses going against them for this weekend...those of historical precedent...and potentially the fan initiatiated...
I think the Merc was the faster race car but simply did not have the delta to overtake. It was a very interesting race to watch.mkay wrote: ↑30 Aug 2023, 10:08Merc did not have the fastest car in 2019. Charles won pole position and could use his massive top speed advantage to defend for 50 laps.AR3-GP wrote: ↑28 Aug 2023, 20:52Ironically, what seems to be about as equally common in the last 4-5 years of races at Monza is having the fastest car and not winning. That happened to Merc in '19, '20, and '21.
So the question is which version of the curse will strike this year? The one where the winner last year doesn't win this year, or the one where the fastest car doesn't win? RB certainly have many curses going against them for this weekend...those of historical precedent...and potentially the fan initiatiated...
+1SiLo wrote: ↑30 Aug 2023, 13:09I think the Merc was the faster race car but simply did not have the delta to overtake. It was a very interesting race to watch.mkay wrote: ↑30 Aug 2023, 10:08Merc did not have the fastest car in 2019. Charles won pole position and could use his massive top speed advantage to defend for 50 laps.AR3-GP wrote: ↑28 Aug 2023, 20:52Ironically, what seems to be about as equally common in the last 4-5 years of races at Monza is having the fastest car and not winning. That happened to Merc in '19, '20, and '21.
So the question is which version of the curse will strike this year? The one where the winner last year doesn't win this year, or the one where the fastest car doesn't win? RB certainly have many curses going against them for this weekend...those of historical precedent...and potentially the fan initiatiated...
RB will probably bring a medium downforce wing for better tire deg. It's an easy RB 1 - 2 and Ferrari vs Mercedes throughout the race.
Aston is actually quite good on the straights in their medium downforce spec. Better than Mercedes at least.