Hamilton ran this in Spa and was one of the fastest non-DRS cars down the straights all weekend. I think they will be ok.
Hamilton ran this in Spa and was one of the fastest non-DRS cars down the straights all weekend. I think they will be ok.
I'm sure it will, it was to illustrate the difference in drag reduction requirements between the Zero Pod and today. It is night and day and this picture couldn't make it more clear, visually.
with a small rear wing and single beam wing, how can this car still be draggy I fail to understand.However Toto Wolff admitted the W14 is “just too draggy for this kind of high-speed race track” which cost them time on the straights.
“When you look at the top speeds, I’ve just looked at the sheet, we’re bottom-end pretty much everywhere. But you can still be high drag and not fast on the straight and still put out a good lap time. But overall generally I think we have been too draggy for Monza, definitely.”
If they can't switch the accumulation curve off from floor and diffuser it will always pay a drag penalty as speed elevates. One of the characteristics of this MB platform right from gestation.Ozan wrote: ↑02 Sep 2023, 22:39with a small rear wing and single beam wing, how can this car still be draggy I fail to understand.However Toto Wolff admitted the W14 is “just too draggy for this kind of high-speed race track” which cost them time on the straights.
“When you look at the top speeds, I’ve just looked at the sheet, we’re bottom-end pretty much everywhere. But you can still be high drag and not fast on the straight and still put out a good lap time. But overall generally I think we have been too draggy for Monza, definitely.”
So essentially for NextYear the chassis/monocoque has to be redesigned to allow for the downwash concept to be fully exploited. This is currently a Frankenstein car, downwash trying to be placed onto a Zeropod chassis.Farnborough wrote: ↑02 Sep 2023, 22:51If they can't switch the accumulation curve off from floor and diffuser it will always pay a drag penalty as speed elevates. One of the characteristics of this MB platform right from gestation.Ozan wrote: ↑02 Sep 2023, 22:39with a small rear wing and single beam wing, how can this car still be draggy I fail to understand.However Toto Wolff admitted the W14 is “just too draggy for this kind of high-speed race track” which cost them time on the straights.
“When you look at the top speeds, I’ve just looked at the sheet, we’re bottom-end pretty much everywhere. But you can still be high drag and not fast on the straight and still put out a good lap time. But overall generally I think we have been too draggy for Monza, definitely.”
To set up the direction of rotation of the vortex it is designed to create (it's not "a deflector" as some have labelled it elsewhere). Vortices are useful in creating downwash so having the downward-rotating side where you want it can be important.
I believe it is also useful to reduce the losses from the cockpit. You can see a similar feature on most teams mirror struts with them in-washing right next to the cockpitJust_a_fan wrote: ↑12 Sep 2023, 13:23To set up the direction of rotation of the vortex it is designed to create (it's not "a deflector" as some have labelled it elsewhere). Vortices are useful in creating downwash so having the downward-rotating side where you want it can be important.