2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
User avatar
Sieper
73
Joined: 14 Mar 2017, 15:19

Re: 2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Also viaplay Scandinavia “could this be due to the flex wing”, max with a twinkle in the eyes, I knew that was coming, we will see next week in Suzuka.

dialtone
dialtone
118
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

So, Max said he was bottoming out a lot on braking so he had to brake more gently, in FP2 you could see this into T1 very easily as his braking was much worse than everyone else.

If this forces them to run the car higher, and this is a smooth track, I don't see how this change is track specific.

Jaisonas
Jaisonas
12
Joined: 05 Oct 2018, 23:30

Re: 2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

The TD is focused around aero and singapore is one of the least aero dependant tracks. Its heavily suspension focused. The directives had nothing to do with redbull's poor performance, they themselves expected to be bad here.

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: 2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Jaisonas wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 16:55
The TD is focused around aero and singapore is one of the least aero dependant tracks. Its heavily suspension focused. The directives had nothing to do with redbull's poor performance, they themselves expected to be bad here.
The updated one was about floor balsa legality mounting.
201 105 104 9 9 7

dialtone
dialtone
118
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Jaisonas wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 16:55
The TD is focused around aero and singapore is one of the least aero dependant tracks. Its heavily suspension focused. The directives had nothing to do with redbull's poor performance, they themselves expected to be bad here.
big over simplification. One piece of it had to do with floors dampening impact via use of rubber/plastic materials in the right places.

Also being good/bad at a track is very different than being out in q2 for a car that won hungary and baku by ridiculous margins. They'll be back ahead next race but the gap is heavily reduced.

User avatar
chrisc90
41
Joined: 23 Feb 2022, 21:22

Re: 2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

dialtone wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 16:58
Jaisonas wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 16:55
The TD is focused around aero and singapore is one of the least aero dependant tracks. Its heavily suspension focused. The directives had nothing to do with redbull's poor performance, they themselves expected to be bad here.
big over simplification. One piece of it had to do with floors dampening impact via use of rubber/plastic materials in the right places.

Also being good/bad at a track is very different than being out in q2 for a car that won hungary and baku by ridiculous margins. They'll be back ahead next race but the gap is heavily reduced.
Why would that explain the slightly quicker race pace though? Surely they would go hand in hand and not just be affecting 1 lap.

Its been a shocking weekend for RB from the get go, 1 bad weekend in 2 years of a new set of regulations is still VERY good going. Other top teams have dropped the ball CONSIDERABLY more than RB have in 4 sessions of the weekend so far.

I'm happy to write this weekend off, near enough and go onwards to Suzuka where, with any luck - fingers crossed - it will be business as usual.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
364
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

The FIA already showed their hand with TD039. For people to think RB responded to that, by developing a car around a plank trick, is not logical.

It will be fun to imagine so, however....

Japan may cause disappointment.

dialtone
dialtone
118
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 17:05
The FIA already showed their hand with TD039. For people to think RB responded to that, by developing a car around a plank trick, is not logical.

It will be fun to imagine so, however....

Japan may cause disappointment.
In all honesty do you really think it's normal that RBR is sitting out Q3? You think bottoming out under braking in T1 is special in Singapore?

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: 2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

chrisc90 wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 17:02
dialtone wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 16:58
Jaisonas wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 16:55
The TD is focused around aero and singapore is one of the least aero dependant tracks. Its heavily suspension focused. The directives had nothing to do with redbull's poor performance, they themselves expected to be bad here.
big over simplification. One piece of it had to do with floors dampening impact via use of rubber/plastic materials in the right places.

Also being good/bad at a track is very different than being out in q2 for a car that won hungary and baku by ridiculous margins. They'll be back ahead next race but the gap is heavily reduced.
Why would that explain the slightly quicker race pace though? Surely they would go hand in hand and not just be affecting 1 lap.
Race hasn't happened yet, and I doubt VERY much they'd be on pace of front runners, even when tyres are in window. Gap is just waaay too big. In hungary when they were trash in quali (relatively speaking) they still managed P2, here at best they'd be like P7-9.

Jaisonas
Jaisonas
12
Joined: 05 Oct 2018, 23:30

Re: 2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Though i agree with most of the above, redbull historically has been bad here. AFAIK wasn't it singapore where redbull brought the wrong springs for that gp and were unstable all over the track a few years ago?

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
364
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Juzh wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 17:10
chrisc90 wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 17:02
dialtone wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 16:58


big over simplification. One piece of it had to do with floors dampening impact via use of rubber/plastic materials in the right places.

Also being good/bad at a track is very different than being out in q2 for a car that won hungary and baku by ridiculous margins. They'll be back ahead next race but the gap is heavily reduced.
Why would that explain the slightly quicker race pace though? Surely they would go hand in hand and not just be affecting 1 lap.
Race hasn't happened yet, and I doubt VERY much they'd be on pace of front runners, even when tyres are in window. Gap is just waaay too big. In hungary when they were trash in quali (relatively speaking) they still managed P2, here at best they'd be like P7-9.
They had better grid positions in hungry and in hungary you can overtake. The problem is on a track like this, there's no room for bad setups and bad tire prep.

Even if they have race pace tomorrow, they will be stuck in a DRS train.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
364
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

dialtone wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 17:09
AR3-GP wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 17:05
The FIA already showed their hand with TD039. For people to think RB responded to that, by developing a car around a plank trick, is not logical.

It will be fun to imagine so, however....

Japan may cause disappointment.
In all honesty do you really think it's normal that RBR is sitting out Q3? You think bottoming out under braking in T1 is special in Singapore?
we will find out what is special in a weeks time I guess.

User avatar
Spacepace
0
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 23:44

Re: 2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Sieper wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 16:42
napoleon1981 wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 16:15
ringo wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 16:12
What everyone will ask...
How much of this championship was atributed to flexible body work, as well as last years?
Max and Perez looking ordinary now. Not able to wring the neck of the car and put it where it doesnt belong.
The other teams could see this last half as an opportunity to get a few wins. But i suspect the car should be sorted out in a race or 2
I dont think what we are seeing today is due to flexible bodywork. Seems like they just couldnt turn the tire on.
From the very fast outlaps, to the poor sector 1 (max had a moment, Perez even spun) to knowing that redbull conserve tires (but heats up poorly) to the Haas’ (very good on tire warm up) being fast, to Max being as fast as the rest on the 3 lap run, everything points to tire temp issues.

A very poor weekend so far, plus grid penalty for Max incoming. Tomorrow if tire wear is good they can still do something.
Yeah I think you've nailed it. We've seen this here before. Everything points towards this. From drivers that don't get probably tyre prep struggling to teams like Ferrari/Haas overheating tyres being able to find ideal grip

User avatar
vorticism
323
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20

Re: 2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

dialtone wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 16:58
Jaisonas wrote:
16 Sep 2023, 16:55
The TD is focused around aero and singapore is one of the least aero dependant tracks. Its heavily suspension focused. The directives had nothing to do with redbull's poor performance, they themselves expected to be bad here.
big over simplification. One piece of it had to do with floors dampening impact via use of rubber/plastic materials in the right places.

Also being good/bad at a track is very different than being out in q2 for a car that won hungary and baku by ridiculous margins. They'll be back ahead next race but the gap is heavily reduced.
It's also an oversimplification to say, "use of rubber/plastic materials in the right places" without suggesting how such a mechanism would function.
Last edited by vorticism on 16 Sep 2023, 17:18, edited 1 time in total.
𓄀

User avatar
Wouter
111
Joined: 16 Dec 2017, 13:02

Re: 2023 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Image

Image

Image

The Power of Dreams!