2023 Singapore Grand Prix - Marina Bay, Sep 15 -17

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
Oleo
Oleo
0
Joined: 01 Nov 2019, 11:15

Re: 2023 Singapore Grand Prix - Marina Bay, Sep 15 -17

Post

dialtone wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 18:45
chrisc90 wrote:
Just_a_fan wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 18:33


Perez dive bombed and has been given a pointless 5s penalty.
Unsure what you (and others) are getting at on this one. The stewards decisions have been consistent with rewarding the 5 second penalty to those drivers who cause a collision.

Apart from making it 10seconds (which would need drivers/teams agreement mid-season) then the only realistic time you can implement it is at the start of the new season.
He dive bombed 2 times and they gave the penalty after the race only when it didn't matter...

No other team is treated like this.
Hamilton literally left the track during an overtake. Last week Russell consciously cut a corner and elected to take the 5 sec penalty over giving the place back, knowing it saved him a lot of time.

dialtone
dialtone
119
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2023 Singapore Grand Prix - Marina Bay, Sep 15 -17

Post

chrisc90 wrote:
dialtone wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 18:45
chrisc90 wrote: Unsure what you (and others) are getting at on this one. The stewards decisions have been consistent with rewarding the 5 second penalty to those drivers who cause a collision.

Apart from making it 10seconds (which would need drivers/teams agreement mid-season) then the only realistic time you can implement it is at the start of the new season.
He dive bombed 2 times and they gave the penalty after the race only when it didn't matter...

No other team is treated like this.
How do you think a penalty in the closing stages of the race, when there is no more pitstops to take, get their penalty applied?

Same happened for Lewis in Monza, and George from memory.


There is literally no other time to add a penalty on in that scenario.
Tsunoda was lap 1... He would be more dead last than he was. But they give him the penalty for the incident that has no impact on his race.

Tsunoda basically just a device to help steer an understeery car. This was similar to Hamilton in Spa, Ham was at fault there and Per was here. But RedBull really needs to do 4-5 penalties to get 1.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: 2023 Singapore Grand Prix - Marina Bay, Sep 15 -17

Post

chrisc90 wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 18:42
Just_a_fan wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 18:33
Oleo wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 18:11


Perez left space in Spa, Ham couldnt keep his line, so one to blame.
Albon didnt leave space, so its both with blame.
Perez dive bombed and has been given a pointless 5s penalty.
Unsure what you (and others) are getting at on this one. The stewards decisions have been consistent with rewarding the 5 second penalty to those drivers who cause a collision.

Apart from making it 10seconds (which would need drivers/teams agreement mid-season) then the only realistic time you can implement it is at the start of the new season.
It's pointless after the race because other drivers can't react to it.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

Spoutnik
Spoutnik
6
Joined: 03 Feb 2015, 19:02

Re: 2023 Singapore Grand Prix - Marina Bay, Sep 15 -17

Post

I have to say Ocon was brillant today


User avatar
mwillems
44
Joined: 04 Sep 2016, 22:11

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

dans79 wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 18:03
Also Merc should have told the FIA to pound sand about giving the place back to Norris!
Image
Feels like Lando did get lucky with Ham giving the place back, he was in control and past Lando.

Russell ran him off the road so he accelerated away and round the bollard, but was not carrying too much speed in the corner for the Norris overtake.
I'm not taking advice from a cartoon dog

-Bandit

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: 2023 Singapore Grand Prix - Marina Bay, Sep 15 -17

Post

Just_a_fan wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 19:56
chrisc90 wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 18:42
Just_a_fan wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 18:33


Perez dive bombed and has been given a pointless 5s penalty.
Unsure what you (and others) are getting at on this one. The stewards decisions have been consistent with rewarding the 5 second penalty to those drivers who cause a collision.

Apart from making it 10seconds (which would need drivers/teams agreement mid-season) then the only realistic time you can implement it is at the start of the new season.
It's pointless after the race because other drivers can't react to it.
So you agree then that hamilton's 5s in monza was also useless :D It was, but perez' is also useless. That's why I suggested 15s instead of 5s in the other thread. Both times I'd make a significant enough difference. F1 seriously needs to reconsider these 5s joke penalties.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
364
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2023 Singapore Grand Prix - Marina Bay, Sep 15 -17

Post

Juzh wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 22:03
Just_a_fan wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 19:56
chrisc90 wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 18:42


Unsure what you (and others) are getting at on this one. The stewards decisions have been consistent with rewarding the 5 second penalty to those drivers who cause a collision.

Apart from making it 10seconds (which would need drivers/teams agreement mid-season) then the only realistic time you can implement it is at the start of the new season.
It's pointless after the race because other drivers can't react to it.
So you agree then that hamilton's 5s in monza was also useless :D It was, but perez' is also useless. That's why I suggested 15s instead of 5s in the other thread. Both times I'd make a significant enough difference. F1 seriously needs to reconsider these 5s joke penalties.
In the FIA WEC, drivers get 3 minute penalties for stuff like this. :)
A lion must kill its prey.

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: 2023 Singapore Grand Prix - Marina Bay, Sep 15 -17

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 22:07
Juzh wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 22:03
Just_a_fan wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 19:56

It's pointless after the race because other drivers can't react to it.
So you agree then that hamilton's 5s in monza was also useless :D It was, but perez' is also useless. That's why I suggested 15s instead of 5s in the other thread. Both times I'd make a significant enough difference. F1 seriously needs to reconsider these 5s joke penalties.
In the FIA WEC, drivers get 3 minute penalties for stuff like this. :)
Too lenient, should get 3 year prison sentence, that'll teach em :lol:

dialtone
dialtone
119
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2023 Singapore Grand Prix - Marina Bay, Sep 15 -17

Post

Juzh wrote:
AR3-GP wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 22:07
Juzh wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 22:03
So you agree then that hamilton's 5s in monza was also useless :D It was, but perez' is also useless. That's why I suggested 15s instead of 5s in the other thread. Both times I'd make a significant enough difference. F1 seriously needs to reconsider these 5s joke penalties.
In the FIA WEC, drivers get 3 minute penalties for stuff like this. :)
Too lenient, should get 3 year prison sentence, that'll teach em :lol:
Not to Ferrari drivers, need to 2x everything to teach them.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
364
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2023 Singapore Grand Prix - Marina Bay, Sep 15 -17

Post

dialtone wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 22:17
Juzh wrote:
AR3-GP wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 22:07


In the FIA WEC, drivers get 3 minute penalties for stuff like this. :)
Too lenient, should get 3 year prison sentence, that'll teach em :lol:
Not to Ferrari drivers, need to 2x everything to teach them.
Truer words have never been spoken :lol: :lol:
A lion must kill its prey.

User avatar
mwillems
44
Joined: 04 Sep 2016, 22:11

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

Szabi1112 wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 22:16
mwillems wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 20:53
dans79 wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 18:03
Also Merc should have told the FIA to pound sand about giving the place back to Norris!
https://i.ibb.co/r7B5XtR/Lewis-past-Norris.gif
Feels like Lando did get lucky with Ham giving the place back, he was in control and past Lando.

Russell ran him off the road so he accelerated away and round the bollard, but was not carrying too much speed in the corner for the Norris overtake.
I agree with Norris saying that Hamilton count on that he wasn't able to pass the turn 1 and in this case he could use the bypass like Raikkonen did in Spa in 2009. What if there was a wall? He would have braken heavily making it impossible to pass Norris.
He was past Norris, he only straightened out because Russell pushed him off track. Hamilton was a bit hard done to on that one.
I'm not taking advice from a cartoon dog

-Bandit

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
364
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2023 Singapore Grand Prix - Marina Bay, Sep 15 -17

Post

Was any explanation given for the first safety car?
A lion must kill its prey.

dialtone
dialtone
119
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2023 Singapore Grand Prix - Marina Bay, Sep 15 -17

Post

AR3-GP wrote:Was any explanation given for the first safety car?
What a ridiculous choice again... Everyone was bunched up anyway, VSC the one thing on track.

Macklaren
Macklaren
12
Joined: 23 Feb 2014, 16:26

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

mwillems wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 22:33
Szabi1112 wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 22:16
mwillems wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 20:53


Feels like Lando did get lucky with Ham giving the place back, he was in control and past Lando.

Russell ran him off the road so he accelerated away and round the bollard, but was not carrying too much speed in the corner for the Norris overtake.
I agree with Norris saying that Hamilton count on that he wasn't able to pass the turn 1 and in this case he could use the bypass like Raikkonen did in Spa in 2009. What if there was a wall? He would have braken heavily making it impossible to pass Norris.
He was past Norris, he only straightened out because Russell pushed him off track. Hamilton was a bit hard done to on that one.
No, it only looks that way because he clearly outbraked himself knowing that he could straightline there corner. He deserved to give the place back

Szabi1112
Szabi1112
0
Joined: 25 Mar 2018, 08:50

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

mwillems wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 22:33
Szabi1112 wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 22:16
mwillems wrote:
17 Sep 2023, 20:53


Feels like Lando did get lucky with Ham giving the place back, he was in control and past Lando.

Russell ran him off the road so he accelerated away and round the bollard, but was not carrying too much speed in the corner for the Norris overtake.
I agree with Norris saying that Hamilton count on that he wasn't able to pass the turn 1 and in this case he could use the bypass like Raikkonen did in Spa in 2009. What if there was a wall? He would have braken heavily making it impossible to pass Norris.
He was past Norris, he only straightened out because Russell pushed him off track. Hamilton was a bit hard done to on that one.
Passing somebody before the corner is not a big thing. What matters is to succeed the corner, but Hamilton failed.
Last edited by Szabi1112 on 17 Sep 2023, 23:30, edited 1 time in total.