Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
saviour stivala
saviour stivala
51
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

Post

The 'one piston ring' engines were called qualifying engine only. The only thing that prevented them running in that configuration in the race distance was oil consumption.

Hoffman900
Hoffman900
211
Joined: 13 Oct 2019, 03:02

Re: Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

Post

saviour stivala wrote:
20 Apr 2023, 20:39
The 'one piston ring' engines were called qualifying engine only. The only thing that prevented them running in that configuration in the race distance was oil consumption.
I know and you missed my entire point.

saviour stivala
saviour stivala
51
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

Post

I can't figure up what point/s of yours I missed. Maybe you will explain. Leaving aside the Piston-pins issues the other racing categories you said run into, this because I never came upon such issues being encountered in F1, Running the F1 engines with just one piston ring blow-by was never mentioned as a problem encountered. could be that crankcase oil/air scavenging in F1 was good enough to cope with the extra blow-by.

User avatar
etusch
131
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 23:09
Location: Turkey

Re: Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

Post

Nissan Patents Engine Block Made Of Carbon Fiber

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technolo ... 70#image=1

Setitup
Setitup
0
Joined: 21 Sep 2023, 00:53

Re: Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

Post

Honda Porsche fan wrote:
29 Oct 2022, 04:56
Martin Keene wrote:
28 Oct 2022, 12:53
johnny comelately wrote:
24 Oct 2022, 20:20
Because a F1 engine is a stressed member cast iron cracks
Cast iron blocks are used a stressed members as well, in tractors of all things! :lol:
The Ferrari F50 uses a cast iron block as a stressed member because aluminum was not strong enough. Why didn't they go with an aluminum block? It was not strong enough.

Which road cars or high performance sports cars use aluminum as a stressed member and how much does it cost and how long does it last long term compared to using grey cast iron or compacted graphite iron CGI ?

I'd like to see the long term results of street racers and drag racers using the Toyota Supra and Dodge Viper iron blocks vs if they were to use aluminum blocks. Some of these cars are producing over 2,000 hp with twin turbo on repeated runs.
The viper is an all aluminum block

Alex077
Alex077
0
Joined: 24 Sep 2023, 12:48

Re: Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

Post

gruntguru wrote:
23 Dec 2022, 00:34
When you start burning stuff on top of the piston it gets hot, grows and doesn't fit the cylinder any more.+
Absolutely,
when combustion residues accumulate on top of the piston, the heat generated causes expansion. This can lead to a situation where the piston no longer fits properly within the cylinder, resulting in reduced engine efficiency and potentially severe damage if left unaddressed.GB whatsapp Apk

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
365
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

Post

saviour stivala wrote:
20 Apr 2023, 20:39
The 'one piston ring' engines were called qualifying engine only. The only thing that prevented them running in that configuration in the race distance was oil consumption.
That would have been desirable from '14-'17
A lion must kill its prey.

saviour stivala
saviour stivala
51
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
09 Oct 2023, 19:45
saviour stivala wrote:
20 Apr 2023, 20:39
The 'one piston ring' engines were called qualifying engine only. The only thing that prevented them running in that configuration in the race distance was oil consumption.
That would have been desirable from '14-'17
If interested in the more detailed technical maters please refer to ''Qualifying 'only' specials (engine) - Gptechnical page 1 of 26 Sept 2019 05:34.

User avatar
coaster
16
Joined: 30 Jun 2012, 05:10

Re: Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

Post

Would anybody have a thread link to a discussion about iron main caps on alloy blocks?
Chevy LS uses this, has this arrangement ever being problematic?

Greg Locock
Greg Locock
235
Joined: 30 Jun 2012, 00:48

Re: Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

Post

You can make a stab at that knowing the coefficient of expansion of the metals and the oil temp, which is unlikely to exceed 150 deg C.

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
642
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

Post

coaster wrote:
24 Dec 2023, 01:57
.... iron main caps on alloy blocks ....Chevy LS uses this, has this arrangement ever being problematic?
well ....
billet LS blocks are made from 6061 alloy ....
unlike the usual cast block alloy (357) it has little silicon and so has greater coefficient of expansion

390 alloy (for pistons) has very high silicon content and so unusually low expansion - but isn't used for blocks
presumably GM knew what they were doing

these lowish coefficients of expansion increase a lot with temperature

Martin Keene
Martin Keene
7
Joined: 11 May 2010, 09:02

Re: Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

Post

coaster wrote:
24 Dec 2023, 01:57
Would anybody have a thread link to a discussion about iron main caps on alloy blocks?
Chevy LS uses this, has this arrangement ever being problematic?
I would imagine every road car aluminium engine block uses iron main caps, aluminium is just not going to provide the durability against the combustion loads. What are you thinking might be the problem with this arrangement?

User avatar
coaster
16
Joined: 30 Jun 2012, 05:10

Re: Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

Post

I often see turbo versions splitting the block along the line of the main bolts, i cant help but wonder if a heat differential played small part in the failure as one fights the other with expansion the bolt line becomes the weak point.

The Ferrari F40 turbo engine uses alloy main caps with only 2 bolts, this kind of failure is unheard of, but then we are talking turbos so whoever controls the wastegate is going to be failure point really, I guess.

Rodak
Rodak
35
Joined: 04 Oct 2017, 03:02

Re: Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

Post

Tommy Cookers wrote:
24 Dec 2023, 19:46
coaster wrote:
24 Dec 2023, 01:57
.... iron main caps on alloy blocks ....Chevy LS uses this, has this arrangement ever being problematic?
well ....
billet LS blocks are made from 6061 alloy ....
unlike the usual cast block alloy (357) it has little silicon and so has greater coefficient of expansion

390 alloy (for pistons) has very high silicon content and so unusually low expansion - but isn't used for blocks
presumably GM knew what they were doing

these lowish coefficients of expansion increase a lot with temperature
Well, I'm curious about the claim of the coefficient changing 'a lot' with temperature. Everything I see agrees that it's not linear and does increase with temperature although the changes are minor; we're dealing with pretty low temperatures in an internal combustion engine. Do you have a source for this? I'd appreciate a reference.

Greg Locock
Greg Locock
235
Joined: 30 Jun 2012, 00:48

Re: Engine block aluminum vs compacted graphite iron CGI

Post

There are step changes in density when solids go through a phase change, which would give a very non linear COTE, I find it hard to believe this is an issue for blocks, heads, or pistons.