Better info than the ESPN article. Seems that Daniel was almost ready for Qatar but not taking risks
Well, that is good news for Liam!organic wrote: ↑03 Oct 2023, 12:19Lawson to drive in Qatar. Ricciardo looks ahead to COTA
https://www.espn.com/f1/story/_/id/3855 ... -formula-1
RIC will drive a year or two and then proceed as the TD at AT? Seems not far fetched if you read the speedrace article.runningmanz wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 07:05Yeah best outcome for all at the moment. No point rushing Dan back and risking more damage to his hand etc.
Good article with some more info in how valuable Dan's feedback has been at AT
https://www.speedcafe.com/2023/10/04/ri ... lphatauri/
.TNTHead wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 07:58RIC will drive a year or two and then proceed as the TD at AT? Seems not far fetched if you read the speedrace article.runningmanz wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 07:05Yeah best outcome for all at the moment. No point rushing Dan back and risking more damage to his hand etc.
Good article with some more info in how valuable Dan's feedback has been at AT
https://www.speedcafe.com/2023/10/04/ri ... lphatauri/
.“I think the other things that were impressive, and reminders of what experience can bring, were: how he could understand the race;
the feedback that he could give live;
how he thought the tyres were behaving – was it a one-stop or a two-stop; or if there was a Safety Car, could he reheat these tyres? Or would we need to fit a fresh set.”
Hyperbole much!TNTHead wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 07:58RIC will drive a year or two and then proceed as the TD at AT? Seems not far fetched if you read the speedrace article.runningmanz wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 07:05Yeah best outcome for all at the moment. No point rushing Dan back and risking more damage to his hand etc.
Good article with some more info in how valuable Dan's feedback has been at AT
https://www.speedcafe.com/2023/10/04/ri ... lphatauri/
Yeah I don't get the salt from some here, it's not just "Australian" media saying this. Also Renault praised him for his feedback and dev assistance, RBR and now AT. No point being bitter about it. It's facts, take it onboard and give him some credit. The teams are not stupid..djos wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 09:24Hyperbole much!TNTHead wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 07:58RIC will drive a year or two and then proceed as the TD at AT? Seems not far fetched if you read the speedrace article.runningmanz wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 07:05Yeah best outcome for all at the moment. No point rushing Dan back and risking more damage to his hand etc.
Good article with some more info in how valuable Dan's feedback has been at AT
https://www.speedcafe.com/2023/10/04/ri ... lphatauri/
Clearly the team believe quality and detail of his feedback is far superior to his predecessors, including Yuki.
.runningmanz wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 14:04.
Yeah I don't get the salt from some here, it's not just "Australian" media saying this. Also Renault praised him for his feedback and dev assistance, RBR and now AT. No point being bitter about it. It's facts, take it onboard and give him some credit. The teams are not stupid..
Well, you are right, but we need to put "dev" into the right context...you still do not develop a car by driver feedback, you "just" set it up. I think this is one of the major strength that RedBull has and AT lacked: You go into FP1 with a semi-optimal setup and the driver needs to give feedback on how to improve. After some minor tweaks for FP2 the guys in the sim use this feedback and work out a better setup for Sat. I think this is where we see a lot of "development".runningmanz wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 14:04Yeah I don't get the salt from some here, it's not just "Australian" media saying this. Also Renault praised him for his feedback and dev assistance, RBR and now AT. No point being bitter about it. It's facts, take it onboard and give him some credit. The teams are not stupid..
Regardless, they wouldn’t have given him an “engineering” role and put him on the pit wall for race weekends if they didn’t value his input.organic wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 14:59In terms of "development" i am pretty certain that they're not referring to the driver's ability to aid car setup improvement within a weekend. They're referring to the ability of the driver to influence the engineers in the right direction to eliminate flaws in the design.
I don't think you are giving Dan enough credit. While he might not have been the most technical guy he knows what a good car should handle like and can steer development in the right direction. Renault even praised Dan for his help developing the car which improved alot with Dan's input esp in 2020.Wouter wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 14:50.runningmanz wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 14:04.
Yeah I don't get the salt from some here, it's not just "Australian" media saying this. Also Renault praised him for his feedback and dev assistance, RBR and now AT. No point being bitter about it. It's facts, take it onboard and give him some credit. The teams are not stupid..
Jonathan Eddolls has praised Yuki several times regarding, among other things, his good feedback on the car and the tire strategy.
Nobody on the pit wall did anything with that and now they would suddenly do that with Ricciardo?!
This is only a statement because RB (SAT) has received a lot of criticism for appointing an "old" driver who was fired from McLaren
due to his poor performance in place of the young, high-performing rookie Liam Lawson.
When Ricciardo still drove for RBR, he very often took over Max's setup and he said himself that he had little knowledge
of technical matters relating to the car. He was amazed at how much Max knew about everything and could give such good feedback.