yinlad wrote: ↑22 Oct 2023, 22:12
Koldskaal wrote: ↑22 Oct 2023, 21:59
Andre said there was a problem with the CFD on your car. He tried some different setups but nothing worked. So we took your Monza car (this was the fastest of your 2023 submissions around COTA). This is why your new car was in the competitor list, but the CFD results are from Monza.
Unfortunately we cannot spend several hours trying to fix a simulation if it doesnt run immediately. So sometimes it has to be this way.
I think it is very unlikely that your car was wrongly assigned to Busor, but mistakes can happen. Only Andre can check this though.
Hmm interesting. I'll double check everything I sent and try to run a full length sim myself but it all ran to varying degrees prior to being sent. No indication of what went wrong or just gave up if it didn't run immediately?
Feel pretty hard done by to have all that develop not even run and not hear anything about it until now
Yes, the CFD simulation failed. We do have rules about this, but I did do one additional step to see if it might work. While we have not had a failed simulation in a very long time, running a race takes so much time, I simply cannot also doctor CFD simulations as well. That is why we provide MFlow with a very robust setup and expect the entries to work in this environment. And most of the time it does. I cannot remember how it ago a simulation actually failed.
If you can provide logs that show, that you can run the car with the
mvrc_long template, I can have another look.
I should have gotten in touch right away, but I was pretty sick during this race, I am happy to have achieved what did get done. I hope, I can send out the scrutineering results and CFD reports tomorrow,
Other than that, congratulations to GRaph, this is real domination. Variante made a nice step, but just barley missed out.
Very big thanks to Max and Christian, who once, more did a fantastic job. As I was sick, I just without warning sent the results and they took care of the rest.