Or on the flip side, Red Bull is happy and is just saving tyres for the sprint / race.TFSA wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 17:27Hamilton engineer reported on radio that he was seeing deflation on the left rear. So that's two cars who has had to pit so far with a (possible) puncture. Hamilton told to box 30 seconds later.
https://i.imgur.com/CifIIFr.png
As for Red Bull: Max doesn't seem to be happy with the performance. They are looking at a lot of parameters and instability. Red Bull only seem to be doing long runs with no quali sim and only on one set of hards, so the times in practice aren't representitive of course.
On your Hamilton puncture, this is naturally promising /s....TFSA wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 17:27Hamilton engineer reported on radio that he was seeing deflation on the left rear. So that's two cars who has had to pit so far with a (possible) puncture. Hamilton told to box 30 seconds later.
https://i.imgur.com/CifIIFr.png
As for Red Bull: Max doesn't seem to be happy with the performance. They are looking at a lot of parameters and instability. Red Bull only seem to be doing long runs with no quali sim and only on one set of hards, so the times in practice aren't representitive of course.
All about getting good race pace here. Overtaking is pretty easy
I'm just interpreting what's being said on the radio. Check my last post - I've edited it and attached a few more screenshots.AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 17:32On your Hamilton puncture, this is naturally promising /s....TFSA wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 17:27Hamilton engineer reported on radio that he was seeing deflation on the left rear. So that's two cars who has had to pit so far with a (possible) puncture. Hamilton told to box 30 seconds later.
https://i.imgur.com/CifIIFr.png
As for Red Bull: Max doesn't seem to be happy with the performance. They are looking at a lot of parameters and instability. Red Bull only seem to be doing long runs with no quali sim and only on one set of hards, so the times in practice aren't representitive of course.
On your RB comment, I don't see the same thing. Deg has looked good. He complained about the seat earlier, then complained about torque out of the final corner at start of long run, and then complained about the wind and consistency on lap 9 (?) of the 15 lap run.
Yes it's more clear. We are saying the same things. I think you just missed the radio messages where Max said it wasn't the car causing the inconsistency, but that it was the wind causing it.TFSA wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 17:34I'm just interpreting what's being said on the radio. Check my last post - I've edited it and attached a few more screenshots.AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 17:32On your Hamilton puncture, this is naturally promising /s....TFSA wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 17:27Hamilton engineer reported on radio that he was seeing deflation on the left rear. So that's two cars who has had to pit so far with a (possible) puncture. Hamilton told to box 30 seconds later.
https://i.imgur.com/CifIIFr.png
As for Red Bull: Max doesn't seem to be happy with the performance. They are looking at a lot of parameters and instability. Red Bull only seem to be doing long runs with no quali sim and only on one set of hards, so the times in practice aren't representitive of course.
On your RB comment, I don't see the same thing. Deg has looked good. He complained about the seat earlier, then complained about torque out of the final corner at start of long run, and then complained about the wind and consistency on lap 9 (?) of the 15 lap run.![]()
Well, Mexico wasn't a sprint weekend. One vs. three practice sessions.AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 17:36Yes it's more clear. We are saying the same things. I think you just missed the radio messages where Max said it wasn't the car causing the inconsistency, but that it was the wind causing it.
I watched the entire stint, and it does not look like they are in trouble. If you saw the FP1 in Mexico, then you know what trouble and high deg looks like
any idea if this happened on the M or the H? Losing a medium would be an issue.TFSA wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 17:27Hamilton engineer reported on radio that he was seeing deflation on the left rear. So that's two cars who has had to pit so far with a (possible) puncture. Hamilton told to box 30 seconds later.
https://i.imgur.com/CifIIFr.png
He was on hards, same as Alonso.search wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 17:41any idea if this happened on the M or the H? Losing a medium would be an issue.TFSA wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 17:27Hamilton engineer reported on radio that he was seeing deflation on the left rear. So that's two cars who has had to pit so far with a (possible) puncture. Hamilton told to box 30 seconds later.
https://i.imgur.com/CifIIFr.png
Ver said the wind was making it hard to brake consistently. I listened to the message live. He stated that one lap he goes long, and another not (with reference to T1). That radio message was clearly Ver, not GP.TFSA wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 17:41Well, Mexico wasn't a sprint weekend. One vs. three practice sessions.AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 17:36Yes it's more clear. We are saying the same things. I think you just missed the radio messages where Max said it wasn't the car causing the inconsistency, but that it was the wind causing it.
I watched the entire stint, and it does not look like they are in trouble. If you saw the FP1 in Mexico, then you know what trouble and high deg looks like
I didn't miss that other radio message, but going only be text, i assumed it was from GP, not Max. It's my experience that it's generally the engineers that suggest to the drivers when wind might have caused a bad corner.