langedweil wrote: ↑27 Nov 2023, 03:04
After watching it multiple times I'd still say that Per didn't overshoot and did make the corner with enough space for another car
It's not an issue of whether Perez made enough space for the other car, but rather whether Perez compromised the other cars line.
Perez is entitled to fight side by side with Lando, but Lando - being the leading driver - is entitled to dictate the line, as long as he leaves Perez the required space. Perez isn't entitled to dictate the line when he's the overtaking driver. It's the same as Silverstone 21, where Max, being the leading driver, gets to dictate the line.
In addition, it was a very late lunge by Perez. He's late on the brakes (he braked at the same time as Norris, but being in a tow and carrying more speed, his braking action is reduced). Characteristics of a divebomb. That's also why Landos turnin looks a bit silly - he didn't expect Perez to take a wider line. But that's on Perez.
You could argue that Lando carries a bit of the blame - and i actually think he does. But a driver only needs to be
predominantly at fault to attain a penalty.
langedweil wrote: ↑27 Nov 2023, 03:04
I'd say the Alo-Ham incident was way way more dangerous .. and that led to a 'no further action'
I've looked at it. It's definitely a knives edge, but Alonso was all the way to the right, was only on the brake very shortly and Hamilton was a bit back. Hamilton wasn't obviously prepared for it, but he might have pounced and just cut past him.
I don't think there was any major danger with the distance between the cars at the time. If they had collided, it would have been a different story - but they didn't. And that's also a major factor. A crash doesn't have to be dangerous to be a problem - it's also a consideration of the fact that drivers shouldn't be colliding on track and ruin each others races.