The car isn't made by him according to the performance people interview. Infact he doesn't do anything mechanical nor does decide what should be done to the car. He spearhead all the top engineering department and make sure they are united in their ideas and thinking.Venturiation wrote: ↑26 Nov 2023, 17:00Speculation thread for the new W15
First car made by James Allison for this new era and new concept compared to the last two
Technical director Allison said Mercedes are confident they now understand the issues that have held back their troubled W13 and W14 challengers.
“You can’t promise anything because everyone is working hard, all the teams are pretty decent, but I think we’re on a very good path,” Allison told Sky at the Qatar Grand Prix.
“I think much of what ails us now is reasonably understood and we’re working to fix that.”
Asked if next year’s car looks like a Red Bull, Allison replied: “I don’t know, I’ve got no idea what they are going to do next year.
“We’ll find out when we all arrive next year.”
Speaking after a disappointing Japanese Grand Prix weekend, Lewis Hamilton insisted that Mercedes need the greatest six months of F1 car development in their history if they are to successfully reel in Red Bull.
Allison agreed with Hamilton’s assessment and warned that Mercedes’ 2024 car will also “set the tone” for the following season, with a large carry-over expected ahead of another regulation overhaul in 2026.
https://motorsport.nextgen-auto.com/IMG ... 1696669143
The car isn't made by him according to the performance people interview. Infact he doesn't do anything mechanical nor does decide what should be done to the car. He spearhead all the top engineering department and make sure they are united in their ideas and thinking.
That’s not what’s been said. Toto was replying to a question from Pedro De La Rosa about the W15 and he said AM’s 2023 early season form proved it was possible to achieve good lap time gains within the current regulations he then ended by jokingly saying “we’re going to make a 2.5 second gain like you have done”
The reference from TW I "thought" was to the difference in pace of the AM chassis at Bahrain in 2022 vs 2023, a night and day shift in performance for them, and all within the new rules set. That's how I understood that value shift of 2.5 secs.morefirejules08 wrote: ↑10 Dec 2023, 02:09That’s not what’s been said. Toto was replying to a question from Pedro De La Rosa about the W15 and he said AM’s 2023 early season form proved it was possible to achieve good lap time gains within the current regulations he then ended by jokingly saying “we’re going to make a 2.5 second gain like you have done”
That’s pretty much what I saidFarnborough wrote: ↑10 Dec 2023, 13:41The reference from TW I "thought" was to the difference in pace of the AM chassis at Bahrain in 2022 vs 2023, a night and day shift in performance for them, and all within the new rules set. That's how I understood that value shift of 2.5 secs.morefirejules08 wrote: ↑10 Dec 2023, 02:09That’s not what’s been said. Toto was replying to a question from Pedro De La Rosa about the W15 and he said AM’s 2023 early season form proved it was possible to achieve good lap time gains within the current regulations he then ended by jokingly saying “we’re going to make a 2.5 second gain like you have done”
Obviously, AM made a first iteration way off mark from the RB 18 in pure pace, leaving considerable room for improvement, which they then enacted with their concept shift development in 22 going into very competitive 23 chassis.
I believe the context of that comment is to say that a poor initial concept was clearly recoverable by AM and within the rules, budget cap etc, etc.
His obvious inference being that MB need to apply themselves and achieve that level of step change within their own chassis philosophy.
If that's true, it seems a perfectly normal and balanced observation to project.