I don't know what speculation on this brings, this series of events should play its course and this stuff can ruin a person's life so I wouldn't go around thinking too creatively about this.ThijsMuis wrote: ↑05 Feb 2024, 21:11Mintzlaff has duty to RB not Horner.organic wrote: ↑05 Feb 2024, 19:43So Mintzlaff or at least RB GmbH talked about this to a journalist, gave them many details, and didn't make them sign an NDA whilst an internal investigation was ongoing.ThijsMuis wrote: ↑05 Feb 2024, 19:14https://twitter.com/xxoMarina/status/17 ... nbl4Q&s=19
Links to podcast in tweet thread
Seems its Mintzlaff if that is accurate
The same journalist then broke this story to the public
I can't see any reasons for doing this other than a political angle?
Horner has duty to himself.
I don't think it's political because timeline is saying people knew about this last week.
I think it's possible Horner made a big mistake Mintzlaff had evidence and said you have to go and Horner said no.
Barrister employed and story leaked.
That looks like pressure being given Horners way.
The problem is, if that is the version of events, Horner is staying.
Just so we are clear, once a sexual harassment/hostile work environment issue is brought up to RB there is virtually no choice but to prosecute unless they want to be themselves liable for the lawsuit and there's zero chance they want that, especially in a non-core line of business.
So for those that say that this is political, the only way that this would be realistically political is if someone from RB convinced an employee to start something with Horner so that Horner would misbehave and then they would investigate. More or less any other scenario isn't political but just a mechanical inevitability, this is how it works in any company in the world, to stop liability you have to investigate very seriously. Press may be blowing a small event out of proportion maybe or what have you, but RB has to investigate, this is how it works.