Lewis' car was literally hugging the ground at the end of the straights.
As in, disqualification levels of plank scraping.
Did he put on more downforce and/or soften the suspension to protect the tyres in the race or something?
They could be relying on increased tire pressures during the race runs to lift the car slightly.GrizzleBoy wrote: ↑01 Mar 2024, 20:57Lewis' car was literally hugging the ground at the end of the straights.
As in, disqualification levels of plank scraping.
Did he put on more downforce and/or soften the suspension to protect the tyres in the race or something?
It is legal as per the rulebook, and rival teams have not lodged any complaints or protests, with Allison describing what the team is hoping to achieve.
"We just want to have less load in that section of the wing, and that's a convenient way of doing it," he said.
"It is a way of us getting the load away in a way that we found efficient - it is just a small chord wing."
I think James Allison has just remembered what was not unusual 20 to 30 years ago. It was not unusual back then that a car had 2 or even 3 different mounting points for the wishbones, as can be seen here in Piola's drawing of the Williams from 2003:ing. wrote: ↑01 Mar 2024, 05:28The fact they didn't design in adjustability at the rear for anti-squat (reaction to thrust load at axle height) or anti-rise (reaction to braking loads at the contact patch) doesn't mean they have not considered these or designed in their effects--they just didn't design in adjustability, either because they understand what the have, or have no room for multiple pick-ups with the existing suspension configuration.atanatizante wrote: ↑28 Feb 2024, 18:08One could question why they didn't do the same trick at the rear suspension as they did at the front one ... or just anti-squat effect is not so important on the F1 car as it is on the slower single-seater formulas? then how about the rear tyre management due to the anti-squat setup, could you please enlighten us with some info ...
Why they designed-in adjustability at the front is a bit of a mystery as no one else has. Maybe they don't have a good understanding of the dynamics and need to test it on track. It is well known that anti-dive reduces compliance to bumps as well as driver steering feel under braking.
Replace the "x" with "twitter" to embed.
The small side pods didn't compromise cooling AFAIK.Venturiation wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:14Why is the PU overheating now that their cooling isn't compromised by zeropods?
Toto just said in an interview they chose the wrong cooling packageVenturiation wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:14Why is the PU overheating now that their cooling isn't compromised by zeropods?
I mean…they were testing there for 3 whole days plus another 3 practice sessions! They had plenty of data to select the best cooling option! So I wouldn’t say this is true…more like an excuse!Watto wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:21Toto just said in an interview they chose the wrong cooling packageVenturiation wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:14Why is the PU overheating now that their cooling isn't compromised by zeropods?
Yeah probably- Lewis sounded pretty disappointed when asked for positives he didn’t really want to answer eventually said at least it’s consistentAMG.Tzan wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:35I mean…they were testing there for 3 whole days plus another 3 practice sessions! They had plenty of data to select the best cooling option! So I wouldn’t say this is true…more like an excuse!Watto wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:21Toto just said in an interview they chose the wrong cooling packageVenturiation wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:14Why is the PU overheating now that their cooling isn't compromised by zeropods?
They've historically specified, designed and run cooling configuration with the projected track position they'd notionally encounter.AMG.Tzan wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:35I mean…they were testing there for 3 whole days plus another 3 practice sessions! They had plenty of data to select the best cooling option! So I wouldn’t say this is true…more like an excuse!Watto wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:21Toto just said in an interview they chose the wrong cooling packageVenturiation wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:14Why is the PU overheating now that their cooling isn't compromised by zeropods?