It’s exactly the same as last year in SaudiFormula 1 fan wrote: ↑06 Mar 2024, 15:15Did Mercedes bring completely brand new rear wing compare to Bahrain race rear wing, or is this modification of Bahrain race rear wing?
Okay, thank you for reply and information.AMG.Tzan wrote: ↑06 Mar 2024, 15:17It’s exactly the same as last year in SaudiFormula 1 fan wrote: ↑06 Mar 2024, 15:15Did Mercedes bring completely brand new rear wing compare to Bahrain race rear wing, or is this modification of Bahrain race rear wing?
No its not the same... its completely different!AMG.Tzan wrote: ↑06 Mar 2024, 15:17It’s exactly the same as last year in SaudiFormula 1 fan wrote: ↑06 Mar 2024, 15:15Did Mercedes bring completely brand new rear wing compare to Bahrain race rear wing, or is this modification of Bahrain race rear wing?
it's not the same wing at all lol, talk about spreading misinformationFormula 1 fan wrote: ↑06 Mar 2024, 15:18Okay, thank you for reply and information.AMG.Tzan wrote: ↑06 Mar 2024, 15:17It’s exactly the same as last year in SaudiFormula 1 fan wrote: ↑06 Mar 2024, 15:15Did Mercedes bring completely brand new rear wing compare to Bahrain race rear wing, or is this modification of Bahrain race rear wing?
Haha. Not sure if I wanted to laugh at that, but it's funny because it's sad but true.
i'm genuinely curious, how can you list all these changes and still say it is just a modified wing from monza/spa/vegas ..are you implying the wing is not new if that's the case then a lot parts on these cars aren't new whether it's from Merc,Redbull, etc..organic wrote: ↑06 Mar 2024, 19:39Merc wing is just modified wing from Monza/Vegas/Spa in 2023 (flap isn't cut and using gurney, and has U cutout behind DRS pod)
https://cdn-6.motorsport.com/images/amp ... f1-w14.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/KFaRfSw.png
Oh yeah that’s right!des_1986 wrote: ↑06 Mar 2024, 15:50No its not the same... its completely different!AMG.Tzan wrote: ↑06 Mar 2024, 15:17It’s exactly the same as last year in SaudiFormula 1 fan wrote: ↑06 Mar 2024, 15:15Did Mercedes bring completely brand new rear wing compare to Bahrain race rear wing, or is this modification of Bahrain race rear wing?
2024:
2023:
Most of the 2024 cars are using completely new wings. Merc are the only top team recycling wings with minimal changes from their 2023 car. I'm not saying it's a bad approach but it's different. Across the teams, Merc are the ones that have invested in a wide array of wings the least since beginning of 2022. They have the barn door (Bahrain 2022) the unspooned low df (miami 22), spooned medium df (bahrain 23), spooned low df (spa 2023). That's only 4 rear wings across the 3 years of regs.kenshi_blind wrote: ↑06 Mar 2024, 22:12i'm genuinely curious, how can you list all these changes and still say it is just a modified wing from monza/spa/vegas ..are you implying the wing is not new if that's the case then a lot parts on these cars aren't new whether it's from Merc,Redbull, etc..organic wrote: ↑06 Mar 2024, 19:39Merc wing is just modified wing from Monza/Vegas/Spa in 2023 (flap isn't cut and using gurney, and has U cutout behind DRS pod)
https://cdn-6.motorsport.com/images/amp ... f1-w14.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/KFaRfSw.png
After watching the above debrief video, I wonder why Merc do not have a larger tolerance than 1 to 2 degrees? (5-8 min of the video) That seems to unreasonable a tolerance with the variables that inevitably affect most any race. Certainly the amount of air reaching one car following another must be assumed can/could/will occur, and certainly Merc knew their pace going into the race was likely not within the top 2 places, and if falling out 1 degree causes a 2 to 3 tenths loss in time, it just seems an unwise engineering exercise to make tolerances that tight with a variance that is so costly. It doesn’t seem reasonable is what I’m saying — a set up for failure kinda thing — whereby it’s so impractical of a value the perfection required to carry out the task simply cannot be reasonably attained within the unknowns of a race.
I'm not sure if the margins are in 1, 2 degree range as they say, but still, I think it is just the cooling philosophy of the team and we've seen this for quite a few years now. Recall those races where sometimes they've had to come through traffic and they struggled with engine temps. Even when their PU had the best power and efficiency, they used to run bafflingly thin margins on cooling - even when they could afford to run a bit looser with their cooling they stuck to the tightest solutions. Last race was a more egregious occurrence of the same philosophy. Perhaps it was a mistake, perhaps it was an incorrect simulation. But they all stem from the Merc aggressive cooling philosophy.Chuckjr wrote: ↑07 Mar 2024, 10:20After watching the above debrief video, I wonder why Merc do not have a larger tolerance than 1 to 2 degrees? (5-8 min of the video) That seems to unreasonable a tolerance with the variables that inevitably affect most any race. Certainly the amount of air reaching one car following another must be assumed can/could/will occur, and certainly Merc knew their pace going into the race was likely not within the top 2 places, and if falling out 1 degree causes a 2 to 3 tenths loss in time, it just seems an unwise engineering exercise to make tolerances that tight with a variance that is so costly. It doesn’t seem reasonable is what I’m saying — a set up for failure kinda thing — whereby it’s so impractical of a value the perfection required to carry out the task simply cannot be reasonably attained within the unknowns of a race.
Is it calls like this which cost Merc ultimately? Or is every team like this?