I agree with that, just not sure we are ready to correlate it to the floor not providing enough grip at the rear for traction zones.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑11 Mar 2024, 15:38I'm not saying they were, but the fact remains their chosen low-level wing is bigger than Red Bull. Ferrari tried adding downforce with the same wing as Bahrain and failed to make it work, Perez made Leclerc look like an F2 car while blowing past. McLaren didn't do this, but the wing was still a bit too big and had an inefficient DRS.mwillems wrote: ↑11 Mar 2024, 14:37***
I'd be surprised if they were adding downforce at the rear at the expense of top speed at this track.
I think the team also suggested that their biggest gain over the winter was grip at the rear.
Edit: looking again, it is probably not flatter. But I do recall that last year we had a limited number of rear wing configurations and we largely ran something similar to Silverstone Spec or Zandvoort/Singapore spec, and we didn't really try to give ourselves many options here.
Quite possibly the issue actually lies at the front of the car. Given how this circuit requires good grip at the front to provide speed at the apex, they may well run more front wing which requires a bigger rear wing for balance.
In fact I rather suspect that is the real reason for the bigger rear wing.
Edit: I'm going to repeat also my nearly year long held belief that in traction zones, part of the issue is having a planted front that allows us to use the traction we have at the rear, and not the rear itself.