The second correlation issue I encountered during the 2023 season was related to flow attachment towards the back of the sidepod undercut.
Beyond the differences in total downforce and aerodynamic balance shown in my previous post, this was the most striking flowfield difference between the Fast and MVRC settings that I discovered when receiving the results of the first 2023 race.
I had developed a very aggressive sidepod for my 2023 car. It featured the usual large undercut with high inlet as well as the wing-shaped wide sidepod seen on current F1 cars. However, I also took advantage of the less restrictive Mantium Challenge rules to extend the undercut to the sidepod trailing edge, improving flow energy towards the rear suspension and beamwing.
This looked great with the Fast settings, but unfortunately much less so with the official results, where there was a large flow separation reducing energy around the floor edge and diffuser.
You can see this difference between the settings on these 2 GIFs :
- Flow velocity on an X-slice :
- Flow velocity close to the car surface (but not exactly on it, as this would be 0) :
For Race 02 (and 03) I decided to reduce the plan-view curvature of the sidepod, hoping this would fix the separation. However this is difficult to do when your development tool doesn’t show you the problem. This only improved the flowfield by a little bit, so for Races 04 and 05 I made further side-view changes and decided to add a large turning vane to contain the separation.
- Geometric evolution of the sidepod :
- Resulting flowfield changes / Flow velocity on an X-slice :
- Resulting flowfield changes / Flow velocity close to the car surface :.
As a lot of other things changed from race 01 to race 05, it is impossible to quantify how much performance was recovered by fixing this flow separation.
However, giving that overall I lost downforce during the season, it is probably correct to say that the time spent on fixing this correlation issue was not worth it.